Jump to content

Identification please.


Recommended Posts

This has just been passed to me for restoration:

20160522_232218r.jpg

Quite acceptable on the outside, strikes but does not run, pendulum missing (may turn up soon), movement very dirty & not signed:

20160530_101706r.jpg20160530_101746r.jpg20160530_101756r.jpg20160530_101812r.jpg20160530_101722r.jpg

Shows serial number 169240 with 18 above on the back plate, 20 on the front plate. Apart from the grime everything seems to be in good order. Any information about the movement (age, maker etc.) would be gratefully received. Also pendulum info would be useful (if the original turns out to have disappeared for good).

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Something tells me this is German, I don't know it's just a gut felling. If it isn't German then it would be English.

The case is an architectural form with what looks like a silvered dial with roman numerals with spade style blued hands and what looks to be a mahogany or mahogany type case going by the one and only case picture.  

The movement is a 8 day Westminster chime with half hour and hour strike and spring driven. It has a regulator hand blued on the dial above the 12. It strikes on gongs. It looks like an anchor escapement.

Here is a picture of what I think the pendulum should look like. You are lucky to have the original suspension spring as this can be used as a guide to the length of the pendulum rod, but the weight you can only guess, It would be quite heavy. The numbers you have quoted to me doesn't help me in any way sorry.         

76.391-8-300.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info OH. Likewise I think its German & may have had a makers name plate screwed above the serial number:

20160530_173804r.jpg

I would suspect that this may have been removed after WW1 due to the anti German attitude at the time, ultimately causing German clocks & other imported goods being labelled 'Foreign'. A quick search for pictures of German bracket clock movements shows similar clocks & movements with missing name plates.

The movement is now stripped awaiting cleaning & I did manage to get it running beforehand. Initial inspection shows no undue wear to the pivots or bushes & no broken or missing parts, so (hopefully) it should be a simple clean & oil. Undecided at the moment whether to re-silver the dial:

20160530_180034r.jpg

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would leave the dial to me its still in good condition. I would go along with that sort of period about the early 1920's.

Here is a good one for you I'm very much into my family tree and on my late Mothers side I found a Bismarck Hambling born 1896, I bet he was popular in the times of WW 1.:D

 

Edited by oldhippy
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 7 months later...

After a rather long pause I finally got round to putting it all back together again. I do respect your advice O.H. but in the end I did re silver the dial & frame:

20160602_213454r.jpg

The movement was dipped in Priory clock cleaner & polished as reqd. Reassembly went without any major incident:

P1030318 r.jpgP1030319r.jpgP1030321r.jpgP1030323r.jpg

Hands cleaned & re blued, new leather pads fitted to strikers, case cleaned with Priory polish reviver.

Before & after:

20160522_231553r.jpg20170121_202225r.jpg20160522_231229r.jpg20170121_202526 r.jpg

Apart from cleaning off the crud on the gongs these were left as is, along with the side & back fabric & mesh grills. Going like a train, gongs & bongs all happy. All in all an enjoyable one, but I am still waiting for the pendulum (which has been found apparently) & none the wiser to identification. 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am getting good at it!!! did it quite a few times trying to find what is causing the stiffness. So I found it... it is the magnetic wheel marked bellow. But... if I try to rotate the magnetic wheel with a stick directly it rotates just fine and rotates the entire mechanism just fine as well. So it is not stuck.  I've tried the other magnectic wheels and got the same result and none of the wheels are bent or have broken teeth.
    • Yes Cyma  R.408 is based on ETA 2724R.  
    • Yep. Tastes great; less filling.  Seems to clean jewel holes just as well as the “fancy” stuff. 
    • Hey thanks for all the info. But there was no mainspring in it. cheers gary
    • Take out the mainspring and measure the length. Go closest shorter mainspring. Shorter, you'll loose  some power reserve but otherwise should be fine. There are calculations to determine how long based on the area of barrel (see NAWCC website). Input the the ID of the barrel, the OD of the mainspring arbor, and the thickness of the spring. The idea is you fill a certain amount (about 1/2?) of the barrel area with coiled spring, with room for the spring to hold tension. Altering the thickness will change the torque available; increase, you can add too much and overbank, decrease thickness and you have too low amplitude. If it's a really old watch (not yours) you have to consider this, as older spring material was less powerful for the same thickness. I've read that watches with bad amplitude (or too much) after servicing can benefit from a different thickness, not a common case. Last resort, you could go for a smaller width, the spring would fit looser in the barrel but one size lower shouldn't really make too much of a difference (so I hear), although technically you want to re-size up the thickness in that case, and there's calculations for that. The last value you'll see on the cousins website is the size of the mainspring package, which should be equal or closest smaller size to the ID of the barrel. If you look at some similar ETA models you might get an idea of approximately how long the spring is, often it's listed with ranfft. Unfortunately for you, not for 272x series, nor the 26xx series, but there is for the 25xxs, and the 277x, so you might have some starting points there if the springs are the same for the other dimensions, barrel size, complications and rate. If you can find your mainspring size measurements, there's other styles of model numbers like the bestfit catalog number (usually a number and a letter), and if you know these you can often find NOS "white-a-loy" springs on ebay or elsewhere. There's scanned documents online from Marshal Handy, Bestfit, General Resorts, Nivaflex that will list more specs on your movement and mainspring. Like here: https://watchguy.co.uk/cgi-bin/mainsprings Some conflicting numbers in multiple entries for the eta2722, but you're seeing ETA2722 numbers similar to the ranfft data, with a length less between 360 and 400mm. Also seems to suggests your GR reference is this one available from cousins: 1.25 x .135 x 400 x 11 Automatic GR3150X Which at .135 is thicker than Ranfft's listed .125 (could be an error with Ranfft?), so you'll have to resolve that discrepancy with some more data points. Best to measure what's in there and/or look it up your movement in some more of those catalogues. Good luck        
×
×
  • Create New...