Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 218
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

There are differences beyond the display size of why someone would pay roughly $3000 versus 225 for a 1900. But for most hobbyists you're never going to notice the difference. I have actually done sid

The 1900 give you the option to manually select the beat. This can be very useful. The 1000 is very limited in this respect. Having said that, the 1000 is excellent for majority of watches you would w

When you finally purchase you watch timing machine you might find the following vid interesting. How to determine what the watch you are working on lift angle is using a timing machine.  

Posted Images

It depends upon a lot of factors? The Chinese timing machines are very sensitive to noise. So noise will affect things. Witschi machines are better with noise but they can still be influenced. Then of course how much noise are we talking about?

For instance at work typically before they turn the ultrasonic cleaning machine on they will check to see if someone's running the timing machine. What's interesting is sometimes it affects the machine and sometimes it does not it depends upon if we can position the microphone behind something and sometimes it works sometimes it doesn't. It also depends on how to noisy the watches a pocket watch versus a wristwatch seems to be a factor also.

 

Then I have a picture attached you'll notice that the Chinese machine may be displaying numbers but the graphical display looks bad? Then the witschi machine is displaying the correct numbers and there's a battery-powered shaver in the picture. This is because I was reviewing both machines and walked into the room with my shaver and noticed that the Chinese machine was immediately very unhappy from considerable distance away. But the witschi machine is fine even with the shaver inches from the microphone. Then both machines should have shown the same numbers because I was using both microphones clipped to the same watch at the same time while I was making the comparisons.

 

 

timing machine and noise.JPG

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, fjseal said:

When using a timegrapher, does the room have to be completely quiet so as not to affect the microphone, thanks.

Not necessarily. I normally listen to music at moderate volume and the reading is not affected, neither is by talking. But if I drop a driver on the bench where the stand is, it draws some points off. It is sensitive and selective at the same time. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 months later...

This the reading I got from an AS1950/51 on my Timegrapher. The rate is four plus signs. I tried another movement and it was okay. What on earth could this be? Do timegraphers need calibrating at intervals in the same way things like torque wrenches and other measuring instruments do? I don't know if these Weischi's go wrong at all, but I am a bit doubtful about mine sometimes.

Thanks all.

IMG_2877.JPG

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, fjseal said:

? Do timegraphers need calibrating at intervals in the same way things like torque wrenches and other measuring instruments do?

No they don't, calibration procedure is not even published or the service available.

8 minutes ago, fjseal said:

I don't know if these Weischi's go wrong at all, but I am a bit doubtful about mine sometimes.

Nothing is wrong with the instrument, but something is with the mov.t, as in the mainspring touching or other issue making it run so fast and with insufficient amplitude - if the latter is to be believed at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, fjseal said:

The rate is four plus signs. I tried another movement and it was okay.

just to be clear one movement we see looks bad and the other one looks fine?

12 minutes ago, fjseal said:

Do timegraphers need calibrating at intervals in the same way things like torque wrenches and other measuring instruments do? 

typically no sort of. There's a quartz crystal in their basically it's so much better than the watch that short-term you'll never notice if it drifted off.

then in situations like this with the timing machine we need to make an adjustment to something which is not the timing machine it's the user.

a simple rule when using the timing machine is that the graphical display should resemble the numeric numbers. So for instance if you see garbage on the graphical screen like you have then the numbers are garbage. The timing machine will attempt to process the signal and unfortunately it has no intelligence. It be so much nicer if the timing machine was a magical crystal ball they could tell you exactly what's going on unfortunately it cannot. this is one of the places where witschi puts a little more intelligence into their machines and if it sees garbage coming in it will tell you that the signals not clean or basically it's having a problem and it will refuse to give you numbers at all. But the Chinese machine will attempt to process and give you numbers so this requires user intervention to say oh dear I'm having a problem.

you need to very carefully examine the balance wheel assembly in the watch. Look at the hairspring make sure it's flat make sure it's not touching the arms. Listen to the watch hold it up to your ear what is it sound like? Are the times when they hairspring is bumping in the stuff to make it interesting clanging noise which timing machines do not like. So you're definitely having an issue with the watch which needs to be fixed before the timing machine can give you? I was a say before can give you usable data but it has given you usable data it's graphically telling you it looks like crap and numerically it's confusing you but is still telling you that you have a serious problem which needs to be fixed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny you mention this because I had experienced the same snowstorm after assembling a AS 1920 (Girard-Perregaux 440 movement) without amplitude or rate and trying to figure out what happened to it. I checked everything and tried different positions until the movement stopped itself and the mainspring unwinding itself.

What really happened is that when I installed the pallet bridge, I screwed lightly then checked that the pallet works fine (it snap from end to end) and happy with it, I resumed the assembly with the balance cock before putting in the TG. When it ran erratically, the screw holding the pallet bridge was unscrewing itself due to vibration until the pallet jumped out of the jewels, thus letting the mainspring unwind itself. Really lucky nothing got broken because when this happened, my heart skipped a beat thinking a pallet stone or a pivot broke off. 

I redid the pallet installation by making sure to screw it tight this time and reran it and I still got a bit of snow but less than the first time. I adjusted the hairspring stud until it get in beat enough and the timegrapher stabilized itself into clean lines then i did small adjustments to get the rate I'm happy (at the end around +0s/d with 220 degree of amplitude at 36000 bph - it's a high beat movement).

Hope my experience shed a light about how to find the cause. Mine is a Weishi 1900.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
On 3/12/2015 at 5:10 AM, JohnR725 said:

One of the more useful things is the display mode where you see 96 seconds and still another mode which will display 192 seconds.

Hi @JohnR725 . Reading through this thread again, and early on you posted about the facility to replay recorded data on the 1900. I'm sure I've done this myself in the past, but now I cannot remember how, and the feature isn't even mentioned in the instructions. Any ideas?

Also, what information do you get from graph type B that type A doesn't have?

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, clockboy said:

This vid explains the difference better than I could. The issue I have not enough money😀
 

 

Money....always that pesky money thing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Going off subject. Have you watched Kalle’s video on Ultrasonic cleaners? Many on here need to change how they clean watch movements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I have and I have always been very cautious with what I use the ultra for. However I also subscribe to Richard Perrett who repairs/ services high end watches and yet he uses an a ultra sonic cleaner. Not sure if he puts the hairspring through it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is Kalle saying not to clean watch parts in that type of (powerful) ultrasonic, or not to clean them with ultrasonic at all? All high end professional watch cleaning machines have been ultrasonic, with or without agitation, since the '60s. I've have never, ever, had an issue from ultrasonic on watch parts.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

Is Kalle saying not to clean watch parts in that type of (powerful) ultrasonic, or not to clean them with ultrasonic at all? All high end professional watch cleaning machines have been ultrasonic, with or without agitation, since the '60s. I've have never, ever, had an issue from ultrasonic on watch parts.

He is saying don't use those type of tank ultrasonic machines for watch parts. Use a proper ultrasonic watch cleaning machine. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, oldhippy said:

Going off subject. Have you watched Kalle’s video on Ultrasonic cleaners? Many on here need to change how they clean watch movements.

That is why in many of my posts I've been warning people not to clean delicate parts in the ultrasonic cleaner for long periods. Never more than 4 mins. And never put anything with shellac in it, like pallet forks and balance wheels. I cringe when I read about people cleaning things in the ultrasonic for 30 minutes. 

In my most recent post, I was talking about building a revolving bottle to put into the ultrasonic to minimize the damage caused by cavitation at the antinodes of standing waves. I haven't tested it out yet. Hopefully if I put a piece of aluminium foil in the bottle and rotate it, it will come out with fewer holes than without any rotation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did ask Kalle what cleaning fluids he uses and it varied depending on what he was cleaning. For watches it was Elma which is not a water based cleaner. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/24/2021 at 7:35 PM, Klassiker said:

facility to replay recorded data on the 1900

I worked it out for myself, by pressing random buttons (my standard method of problem solving with electronic devices). Here's how to display (not replay) the data from the most recent measurement:

1. Stop the measurement by pressing the red button

2. Immediately press either the up-arrow, or the down-arrow.

3. Toggle between graph-type A (last 80s of the measurement) and graph-type B (last 160s) using the arrows.

Unfortunately, the measured rate, amplitude and beat-error are no longer displayed.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/24/2021 at 7:35 PM, Klassiker said:

what information do you get from graph type B that type A doesn't have?

Here's my attempt to answer this question myself, by comparing curve type A (what the manual calls "normal"), and type B ("complex") of the Weishi 1900 maschine.

When a watch is running nicely, with clean traces, the type B graph doesn't show anything which cannot be seen better with graph type A. Type B only shows one trace, representing the rate. Type A displays two traces so we get a graphical representation of the beat error as well as the rate. I didn't see much point in showing this comparison, as type A is obviously superior. I looked for a watch in my collection which isn't running so healthily, and put that on the machine. The first pair of photos (1A and 1B) show the watch straight out of the drawer (fast rate, intermittent bad interaction between a pallet jewel and an escape-wheel tooth). The second pair are after magnetising the watch.

1A:

161122733_TypeAmag0.JPG.26084ad692f5e41714c31533dc5ec7b4.JPG

 

1B:

582790202_TypeBmag0.JPG.0946db5d3defc3b86c86d7f6a77c2eab.JPG

 

2A:

602391556_TypeAmag3.JPG.3bf218de6a58be9c97035e7c7d937696.JPG

 

2B:

387122102_TypeBmag3.JPG.b5a3172c541b140af782363e7bda0e0d.JPG

I don't know why the manufacturers refer to the type B curve as complex, when in fact it is simpler and doesn't display as much information. Looking at the comparisons above, this may be to its advantage, when a watch is running so badly that the type A curve is such a mess it becomes difficult to interpret, In this case it may be wothwhile looking at the recording of curve type B.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By deathkei
      Hello
      I measured my Omega Caliber 1120 through an timegrapher app. (Dial Up, full wind)
      I know the app is not very accurate.

      I checked about +100s/d difference and sharply tilted graph .
      The odd thing is that the bottom part of the graph is not printed every 100+- seconds.(red-colored circle)
      Is this a feature of the timegrapher, or does it indicate abnormal state of movement component?
       
      Thank you for the comments.
    • By FitOutPost
      Hi, my name is Ross. I am a rookie watch enthusiast and I am really puzzled here.
      Could someone explain to me what kind of a problem am I facing with my timegrapher?
      I do two sets of measurements with the same watch (1 day or 6 days apart) and receive vastly different results - to the point of being completely different from what I observe in real life. 
      For example, my timegrapher shows that my watch is running fast (or ahead of time), while in real life I observe that it runs 7 seconds per day behind. I even recorded a video about it so you could see it for yourself: https://youtu.be/mhGzf6aLMlY
      How should I interpret that? Am I doing anything wrong?

      Problem_with_Timegrapher_-_Knowledge_Sharing__16.mp4
    • By east3rn
      Hello. 
      I am working on a vtg. Citizen cal.7520 automatic movement.
      I have put the watch on the timegrapher 
      The graph looks OK but the beat error shows 9.9ms. I presumed that beat error should be around 1.0~2.0 given the shape of the graph.
      Is the beat error actually bad or the timegrapher is wrong??
      Thank you!
       

    • By Padd
      Hello Everyone,
      Padd here from the UK.
      It all started with a desire to fix a Submariner replica I bought off a lucky lucky man in Pisa, Italy while on a European tour.
      Next thing I know I'm investigating Submariner replicas and building my own, signed by me, using a Seagull ST2130 movement, adventure watch.
      Now I'm hooked, I took inspiration from Marks videos, now I'm happily starting to work on parts of the movement, and have recovered one or two movements where the stem came out, but wouldn't stay back in. I have built a few watches for friends and relations, but now I need to be able to service them when they come back to me.
      I also have a couple of movements that run really badly, so I will be practising on those over the winter weekends. Full repair/servicing kit IS my Christmas present.
      I really want to get one of those ST2130's, serviced and tweaked by me, doing a -------------------------- on my timegrapher. not a -.'-.'''--,'.'.' (and worse) that they do at the moment.
      I wont start to list my watch collection, but it runs from a Casio digital to a Rolex pocket watch with Seikos, Citizens, Omegas and home builds in the mix.
      Must do Mark's course, but I'm afraid I may have already learned 60+% of it already.

  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh my...you should have hyphenated "leather-working" because it modifies "forum."  I will contact the administrator to see about having you kicked off!!
    • Welcome to WRT  forum.  
    • Thanks for the reply! I live in the US and I do have most of the stuff I need. I do have a full set of Moebius greases and oils as well. Looking at the 1900 for a while now, so I'll probably pick that up. As I said, I have a pretty good set of tools including hand levers, Presto Tools, Bergeon Screwdrivers, Dumont tweezers, loupes and other magnifiers, movement bed, Bergeon hand oilers and pots, Bergeon movement-holder, pith and peg wood, Rodico, etc, etc, etc. I have a couple of Seagull 6498s and a Seagul 2824-2 to practice destroying....er.....assembling and reassembling.
    • The intro is like something from a tv show but the instructional parts seem to be from a live training course. I'm 5 videos in and hooked, will be watching them all, great find!
    • you left out an important detail by the way? A lot of this depends upon where you live.. One of the recommendations I like to give beginners is purchasing a brand-new 6497  Chinese clone  as the Swiss originals too expensive in the clone works just fine.. Then you definitely want a timegrapher iin the beginning there very cheap now compared to what they once cost either the Chinese 1000 or the 1900 are both excellent machines. So if you have a new timing machine  and a new watch  you can llearn how to properly time things on the machine. You can look at your brand-new watch see how it functions. Then you can taken apart  and put it back together  and put it back on the timing machine and see if it still functions. Timing machines are more than just timing their diagnostic devices. There's so many questions newbies ask where if they just a timing machine it would help narrow the problem down considerably. Does not like you can hold the watch to your four head and absorb the knowledge of its problems you need  ways of doing diagnostics. Then unfortunately magnetized watches don't run well  they will have issues. aa unfortunate problem with watch repair is that is a heck of a lot of specialty tools that sooner or later would be really nice to have.. As long a basic tools you have to have.  Then when you get in the lubrication  is some of those are nice to have an they're not exactly cheap  so this isn't exactly a really cheap hobby.  
×
×
  • Create New...