Jump to content

Watch Crystal Polishing


Recommended Posts

Wow JD, it seems I'm reading minds since I just came from putting the same model in my amazon wish list! Thanks for showing it and clarifying this whole thing! Much appreciated.

 

...ramrod, if the scratches are very deep, you will have to sand too much down and might not be able to either finish it right (not removing the deep scratches completely) and/or making the crystal out of shape...at least that's my interpretation of it, since we are sanding those critters smooth. Still, it would be interesting to see how you fare!

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bob - i know what you mean about the crystal getting out of shape. last year i bought another seiko diver and i could tell that it was polished - hard. the surface is all wavy, but there are no scratches. i would think that simple straight line sanding would do the trick. this crystal must have been done mechanically and they weren't consistent with the pressure being placed on the crystal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very true, the way JD illustrated, I see him sanding against a flat surface. Still, if it is too much/deep the scratch, you are risking of "thinning" the crystal....just let's hope for the best! As for me, I'm getting that dremel...experimentation: that's what's all about! :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

this would be worth the effort  - if i have the ambition. after looking at it, i think i can get below probably all of these scratches. \on another forum, ausimax (max) had a recipe for polishing glass crystals. i can't put a finger on it, but he was effective in getting some crystals polished out.

if your out there, max, chime in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i gotta tell you that is an excellent job. it looks like a new crystal. i just purchased a seiko diver that needs a lot of help with the crystal. i am actually gonna buy a new one, but i'd be interested in trying this method on this crystal. the diver i got has quite a few deep scratches that i think might not polish out.

the deep scratches will polish out if you start with the 240 grip on a drummel. The drum disk.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi ramrod,

 

I did a few on Seiko sports 100's they are not too bad to do as the crystal stands proud of the bezel, so you can work them in the case (easier to hold), I have a 4 sided diamond sharpening block 200/300/400 and 600 grit depending on how bad the crystal is , but i usually start at 400 grit and grind out all the marks I can see, then on to 600 grit then I move to wet & dry paper on a sheet of glass and work through 800/1000/1200/1500 grit and finish with 2000 grit, then i polish with a felt buff on the dremel and Brasso.

 

Takes a bit of time and patience but they come up OK and as these are on vintage watches that are not going to be water proof thinning the glass is no real concern, a different matter with an active diver I would go with a new crystal, but for old Seiko's the new original crystal is worth more than the watch.

 

Max

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Max, your technique is basically what I did with the exception that I was able to get rid of the deap scratches with a drum sanding bit (240 Grit) on the Dremel. Where the crystal has a dome, I did rock it a bit to not flatten the top. It is an acquired skill I think but is worth it. On the diving side, I don't think taking a bit off the top of the crystal makes a difference I the structural integrity of the crystal, unless you dive to 1000 feet or more. Most dives are between 40 and 80 feet...i am an old NAUI certified diver.

From Canada

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On March 11, 2016 at 10:51 AM, jdrichard said:

Ok, revised advice. I took the Crystal once again as there were two small hairline scratches that were just bugging me, and tried to remove them using pumice. That made it worse. Then I used my drumel again and tried to buff out the new scratches; that didn't work. Then I got out the 1200 grit and worked a full sheet of rubbing followed by the 2000 grit and a half sheet of rubbing; THAT WORKED! So new technique should be Drumel with 240 grit drum for the first shooting and major scratches followed by a quick drumel buff with number 6 High Gloss, followed by 1200 grit, Two Sheets of hand rubbing and 2000 Grit 1 sheet of hand rubbing (sanding). DO NOT GO IN CIRCLES while rubbing; back and forth is best. Thanks.c57d3bc465bd728e67c60a8688664877.jpgc80a5f8af13ad56d65617b4a571299ad.jpg

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hi JD,

My scratches seem to be shallow. Do you think this might work with just a 240 grit paper folloowed 1200 and 2000 grit? Or is the drumel absolutely necessary? 

Thanks, Phil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi JD,

My scratches seem to be shallow. Do you think this might work with just a 240 grit paper folloowed 1200 and 2000 grit? Or is the drumel absolutely necessary? 

Thanks, Phil

Drumel not necessary. Just use 1200 and 2000 if scratches are not deep

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

In my experience the only thing that grit 1,200 and 2,000 do to scratches is waste your time, including on a rotary tool. 

Again from experience the best results come with diamond paste on a felt wheel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

I see this is a dormant thread. Hope that it's OK  to revive it. 

I've just ordered a set of inexpensive diamond paste syringes from a Chinese (where else?) supplier - 5 grades - and 100 cheap Dremel buffing wheels - which I've found to be very rapidly consumed.  I have a question about handling the crystals. When polishing UBs I use a large dollop of Blu-tack (indispensable tool!) moulded inside the lens and then stuck to a flat work surface. This prevents firing the lens across the room whilst buffing. 

My query is, when diamond paste polishing of mineral glass, using the above fixing method, what is the risk caused by heat build-up?

Roy

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I wish they would have done so in this case. The whole story went like this: I sent my speedmaster to an omega service center about 10 years ago (at that point of time I haven't even started watchmaking). After the watch came back to me it had only about 6 months wristtime until january 2024 (not fair for this nice watch but the other pieces of my collection want wristtime too 🙂). So my conclusion is that the barrel was already faulty when it came back from service, can't imagine that amount of wear in 6 months wristtime. In january 2024 the performance on the wrist was quite bad, so I decided to have a look by myself. I have to admit that I didn't check the barrel close enough as I thought it must be ok, couldn't have issues after official omega service. That was a mistake, I will learn from that. Follow the golden rule: Nothing is certain except death and taxes.
    • I am same as you oldhippy I won’t touch anything with a battery, I keep getting requests to but I just say I only do mechanical clocks, there are quite a few errors & omissions with the repair guide have a look at this. https://mb.nawcc.org/wiki/Encyclopedia-Subjects/Torsion-Clocks/Book:Horolovar-400-Day-Clock-Repair-Guide-10th-Edition-Errors-and-Updates
    • Nice experiment. As it will be no problem, please put a twice less mass (half of the two penies) and read the amplitude, will be interesting. I mean to determine what is the relation torque/amplitude.
    • parts touching that aren't supposed to touch definitely would cause an issue. there not supposed to be touching there supposed to be independent which means that @VWatchie is correct that the ratchet wheel has no effect on performance. so if the ratchet wheel in your particular case is touching that is definitely going to be an issue and needs to be addressed. did you know that the Swatch group service centers do not change mainsprings? Swatch group service centers have an infinite supply of spare parts so they just change the mainspring barrel the whole thing. Plus anything else the watchmaker doesn't like just gets replaced like anything related to the escapement they just replace the components because they can.
    • The pivots look OK. In this position, balance may rub on the pallet bridge, the roller table may rubb on the pallet fork, the bottom of roller table may rubb on the main plate, and on the tip of the screw that fixes the bottom endstone plate, the impulse jewel may rubb on guard pin, the rounded part of the pivot may rubb on the hole jewe too. Thiss all may be due to broken, missing or moved down endstone, or the plate with the stone has some dirt or other obsticle under it. But, sometimes different odd reasons can exist, like for example someone has changed the balance from a donnor movement. All the reasons are visible and must be checked. For beginning, remove the lever and it's bridge and do the free oscillations test.
×
×
  • Create New...