Jump to content

Crystal Polishing?


mcass

Recommended Posts

I am VERY new to watch repair. I have an M9 Bulova Oceanographer that had some very serious scratches and gouges in the crystal. At the suggestion of a friend, I used Flitz Metal Polish on it. Simply rubbing it over the crystal with my index finger in circular motions for literally about 8-10 hours across a two week time frame. The crystal is now gorgeous with no signs of scratches or other imperfections.

With my success doing this, I bought a 90's Seiko at a thrift shop for a couple of bucks that had some very serious scratches in it (not near as bad as the Bulova). I have tried the same thing on the Seiko for an hour or so and don't think it is doing a thing. Are crystals made of different materials? Can a Seiko crystal be polished?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many vintage "crystals" are actually a plastic polymer resin or plexiglass, Omega has a plastic crystal material named Hesalite.

 

These can be polished quite easily with great results by simply using a very fine abrasive like Brasso.

 

Mineral crystals are the next step up and are much harder than plastic but can still be scratched. One advantage is that the aren't as brittle as sapphire crystals. Being softer than sapphire they can be polished more easily, but not as easily as plastic.

 

Sapphire crystals are hardest of the three and are hard to scratch (but not impossible) and are hard to polish without proper abrasives and tools.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Mcass & JiminOz;

I'm currently facing the same problem / question. I bought some diamond paste, different grit sizes from #600 down to #10.000 and attempted with a Proxxon, similar to a Dremel, and small felt-discs to polish a sapphire crystal. Started of with #1000, but that didn't seem to bring anything. With grit #600, slow progress is made, but the crystal gets quickly very hot. Obviously I try to spread the heat evenly over the crystal to avoid great stresses, and allow cooling periods, but progress is slow.

Edited by Endeavor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless your crystal is unobtainable then I'd just suggest a new crystal (even generic crystals may be suitable).

 

Far easier, and the risk with using buffing discs is dishing or ending up with an uneven surface. Ideally you would grind the crystal on a super flat plate (unless it was domed). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very true that the sapphire crystal may/will not become flat. I started off on a flat mineral glass plate, manually, and unlike as "shown" on some YouTube video's, I wasn't getting anywhere.....that is to say, it was the mineral glass plate which got grinded :(

My first learning "casualty" sapphire crystal is from a cheap quartz watch, a watch not worth a new crystal.

Seems, to get a perfect job, you need one of those disc they use to polish diamonds? ($$$?)

To summarize; I had no real suc6 jet.........

Edited by Endeavor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've experimented by making a paste of cerium oxide, a tiny drop of cooking oil and bicarb powder.  I also used a Dremel with a polishing disk.  First I ran the paste over the crystal, then used the Dremel for about thirty seconds.  Then you wait a minute or so for the crystal to cool and then repeat.  It takes some patience but it does make a difference on glass crystals.

Edited by stroppy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless your crystal is unobtainable then I'd just suggest a new crystal (even generic crystals may be suitable).

 

Far easier, and the risk with using buffing discs is dishing or ending up with an uneven surface. Ideally you would grind the crystal on a super flat plate (unless it was domed). 

Where can you get Seiko crystals and are they difficult to change out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...