Jump to content

Seiko 6R15 Service Walk-Through


jdm

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, FALLINGTITAN said:

and the barrel is sealed and lubricated for life

This always amuses me as a wonderfully ambiguous statement. Lubricated for life? which is how long....?????

One wonders if Seiko would provide a free replacement spring and barrel if it were found to be faulty after the warranty period has expired on the grounds that a reasonable lifetime for the watch (and therefore any component contained therein) is significantly more than the normal 1 year warranty period that is usually offered, especially since in practise their watched have been shown to last 50+ years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back in the 70's and 80's when parts for Seiko movements were plentiful, Seiko recommend you changed the barrel complete I think every 5 or 7 years. These days you have to take the barrel apart and clean it all and put back as parts are more likely to be obsolete.   

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oldhippy said:

Back in the 70's and 80's when parts for Seiko movements were plentiful, Seiko recommend you changed the barrel complete I think every 5 or 7 years. These days you have to take the barrel apart and clean it all and put back as parts are more likely to be obsolete.   

That's not the case of the 6R15 mov.t discussed here. Cousins has the barrel complete in stock, as well for the extremely popular 7S26.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

2 hours ago, Marc said:

This always amuses me as a wonderfully ambiguous statement. Lubricated for life? which is how long....?????

One wonders if Seiko would provide a free replacement spring and barrel if it were found to be faulty after the warranty period has expired on the grounds that a reasonable lifetime for the watch (and therefore any component contained therein) is significantly more than the normal 1 year warranty period that is usually offered, especially since in practise their watched have been shown to last 50+ years.

No need to question Seiko here, the stament that made you raise objection after almost 4 years that I wrote it is mine only, if you allow me.

1 minute ago, CaptCalvin said:

His point is that the same would have to be done down the line for the 6r15 as well

Could be, fact is I still have to see a Seiko watch that benefitted from the "sealed" barrel being manipulated, M/S hand refitted, etc.

In any case having parts available today for a currently produced mov.t is still better than the Swiss that won't sell parts period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jdm said:

That's not the case of the 6R15 mov.t discussed here. Cousins has the barrel complete in stock, as well for the extremely popular 7S26.

I guess not, but I'll ask just in case someone happens to know. The barrel complete for the cal. 7S26 has part number 201.083 whereas the barrel complete for cal. 7S36 has part number 201.083. Aren't these two calibres extremely similar, just that the escape wheel and third wheel pivots uses cap jewels on cal. 7S36? I.e. shouldn't the barrel and the spring be the same? Anyway, that's what I'm hoping as I would pay dearly for a barrel complete for my 7S36B movement.

Also, the 7S26C is listed as having the same barrel as the 7S26, but the barrel complete is not on offer for the 7S26A and the 7S26B movements. Surly, it must be the same barrel, no!? Yes, I could look up this myself, and it could be that Cousins simply missed this, but as I said, if someone already happens to know this by heart. Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jdm said:

No need to question Seiko here, the stament that made you raise objection after almost 4 years that I wrote it is mine only, if you allow me.

My error @JDM, I had assumed that it was a Seiko claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, VWatchie said:

The barrel complete for the cal. 7S26 has part number 201.083 whereas the barrel complete for cal. 7S36 has part number 201.083.

Which as you wrote them are the same part numbers. Now, I had answered this before, but can do that again it here. 

Tecnically speaking there is no designation such 7S26 and no letter. Since its introduction, Seiko has placed a letter at the end, that is A, B, or C in chronological order of introduction. When someone refers to 7S26 and no letter, in a technical context that can introduce ambiguity.

To help on the matter I have summarized all these changes is a document, here's it again:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sYt_mI9c4tAPiKN3IM8lQx3NEEOyz2DMjVHx5I1_Mqw/htmlview

Quote

Anyway, that's what I'm hoping as I would pay dearly for a barrel complete for my 7S36B movement.

Just go on Ebay or the Internet and search for the P/N detailed in the document above. You may need to add or omit both the leading zero and the separating dot in order to get all matches.

Note, you can be asked ridiculous prices for either new or used individual parts. The best approach is to get a complete mov't or watch for cheap, and use it as a source of parts. 

Quote

Also, the 7S26C is listed as having the same barrel as the 7S26, but the barrel complete is not on offer for the 7S26A and the 7S26B movements. Surly, it must be the same barrel, no!?

No it is not, and the notes in my document explain why. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, jdm said:
23 hours ago, VWatchie said:

The barrel complete for the cal. 7S26 has part number 201.083 whereas the barrel complete for cal. 7S36 has part number 201.083.

Which as you wrote them are the same part numbers.

Oh, my apologies, I was tired and made a mistake! The barrel complete for cal. 7S36 has part number 201.024 (According to CousinsUK).

Thanks for your input and for sharing the information! :thumbsu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, VWatchie said:

The barrel complete for cal. 7S36 has part number 201.024 (According to CousinsUK).

More accurately: for 7S26A and B, and 7S36B, it's either 201.024 or 201.075

That according to the Seiko service sheets from which I compiled the document linked above. 

With the hope that this will help you resolve the matter, and perhaps return to this topic to its intended subject. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OK, welcome in the world of alarm clocks... I guess the 4th wheel is dished because it is from another movement. If it was not dishet, then it would not mesh with the pinion of the escape wheel, am I right? The marks of wear on the 4th wheel pinion doesn't corespond to the 3th wheel table position, at list this is what i see on the picts. Calculating the rate is easy - there is a formula - BR = T2 x T3 x T4 x T5 x 2 /(P3 x P4 x P5) where T2 - T5 are the counts of the teeth of the wheels tables, and P3 - P5 are the counts of the pinion leaves. Vibrating the balance is easy - grasp for the hairspring where it should stay in the regulator with tweasers, let the balance hang on the hairspring while the downside staff tip rests on glass surface. Then make the balance oscillate and use timer to measure the time for let say 50 oscillations, or count the oscillations for let say 30 seconds. You must do the free oscillations test to check the balance staff tips and the cone cup bearings for wear. This kind of staffs wear and need resharpening to restore the normal function of the balance.
    • Glue a nut to the barrel lid, insert a bolt, pull, disolve the glue.  Maybe someone will have a better answer. 
    • The stress is the force (on the spring) x distance. The maximum stress is at the bottom, and decreases up the arm. That's why they always break at the bottom. I used a round file, then something like 2000 grit to finish. I gave the rest of the arm a quick polish - no need for a perfect finish. Just make sure there are no 'notches' left from cutting/filing. The notches act like the perforations in your toilet paper 🤣
    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
    • 🤔 what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ? Making a small groove so the lubrication doesn't spread across the component but what if when lubing a little overspills and sits on the epilame .
×
×
  • Create New...