Jump to content

More On The Harwood Watches


cdjswiss

Recommended Posts

For those of you who have read and were interested in my previous post on Harwood watches (the first automatic watch) here is another interesting example. This one was marketed by Blancpain in Barcelona around 1930. The hand setting is now done by turning the watch back and there is a four-cornered screw head (arrow) that turns against a leaf spring to adjust the pressure of the slipping clutch that prevents over winding.

 

post-374-0-89251100-1452082409_thumb.jpg

 

post-374-0-41029000-1452082612_thumb.jpg

 

post-374-0-41631600-1452082505.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice watch Colin, you certainly know how to get my attention. Does the back just snap off and are you going to service this one?

 

The back does indeed just snap off as does the font bezel. The movement is front loaded with two half-head screws to hold it in place. This arrangement makes it less dirt proof than the more conventional Harwood.

I have just done a complete service and it is now keeping time to better than one minute per day. The silver dial with gold numbers is original and has just had a light brush over to remove a little dirt.

Harwoods have a reputation of not running for more than 12 hours, but this is nonsense. The power reserve depends on the Schild movement and is well over 24 h. A mal-adjusted automatic winding system probably accounts for poor performance. But this one I have worn 16 hours per day and taken it off for the 8 hours overnight and it has not stopped since I began to wear it on the 1st January.

The Spanish patent number on the winding bridge is a mystery - some have attributed it to the back-setting feature, but it cannot now be found in any Spanish official record. It is thought that perhaps, although filed, it was never granted. The novel slipping clutch screw adjustment permits easy and stable over-wind protection. I wonder if this was a Blancpain add-on?

 

post-374-0-05600500-1452093675_thumb.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
    • 🤔 what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ? Making a small groove so the lubrication doesn't spread across the component but what if when lubing a little overspills and sits on the epilame .
    • Why just the bottom mike ? Is it worth polishing the whole arm ?
    • The one thing I took time over was to round and polish the curves at the bottom of the jumper arm. The slightest mark (left over from cutting of filing) acts as a stress raiser, just where you don't need it. 
    • I printed the base and it is a bit too large to fit on the base of the hand setter. The ring bumps into the column so it is unable to full seat on the central ring. I'm going to try removing some of the materal and see if I can't get it to go down.
×
×
  • Create New...