Jump to content

Adjusting screwdrivers to fit the screws


Recommended Posts

I’m just wondering what normal practice is here. So far I have only worked on the st3620 movement but it seems to me that the width of many of the screws on this movement is much wider than the tip of the correct screwdriver. I have had quite a few slips because of this but not managed to break anything yet!

I’m comfortable sharpening and then blunting (not sure if that is the right term) the screwdriver tips but it seems I would really have to do a lot of blunting to get a correct fit on this movement. 

Is it common practice to regularly adjust screwdrivers in this way and would you to do this for each movement worked on?

I have a set of Horotec screwdrivers in most sizes for 0.6 to 3mm

Thanks, Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My experience is you are constantly dressing screwdrivers to fit. The bigger the variety of movements the more you need to do it. If a watchmaker specialises in say, 2 or three movements they conceivably have a set of drivers dedicated to each.

 

Tom

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The professional watchmakers I know all have several sets of screwdrivers, each set honed for a particular movement or brand. I'm also often told not to use the same screwdrivers for quartz and mechanical, I guess because of magnetism, but I just de-mag mine often.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a few things I need to say here 😄....thats a shocker 🤣. So first off I'm assuming we are talking about the thickness of the tip that should WEDGE itself into the screw slot. Bottoming out of the tip in the slot is the common scenario of a blade about to slip out and indiscriminately scratch anything in its path. Particularly if the screwdriver is not held perpendicular to the screw head. Now I'm a joiner of 40 years and before that picked up my first driver at around 3 years old, apparently forcing it into the speaker of my dad's radio 55 years ago 🤣. So i should know how to handle a driver...yes ?   actually no i did not...not in the case of watchrepair. Mainly because the tips of watchmaker's screwdrivers are thin and have little surface contact. It took me a day on and off of scratching up old movements to figure out what I was doing wrong. The tip needs to fit the slot thickness snuggly as a wedge and not bottom out...that's it. Unless you are very good at holding your driver straight up and down. Reminds me of when my apprentices would hold a hand driver or battery driver at all manner of angles and wonder why they chewed up screw heads. " Hold the jeffing thing straight " I would whisper gently in their ear 🤣 . Rambled on long enough me thinks... secondly learn to dress your drivers....nooo... not cute little outfits.....shape them. Nice accurate equal angled sides that fit as a wedge and a straight end. The wedge fitting sometimes lifts out the screw as well. I've seen folk polish driver tips ??? I dont get that, not completely , it might look nice and shiny and ward off some corrosion, but it has no grip. I generally go no higher than 400 grit, the flat bottom can be a bit rougher if you like. I like a bit of grip same applies to my soft tweezers, more so in fact. I dont repair Patek watches 😄 so I'm not fussed about zero damage to screw heads. If I did then i would change my ideas. And lastly the driver should more or less suit the size of your hands if they are one way or the other. I have stupidly large joiner's hands for a guy of only 5'9" , took me a while to get accustomed to using diddy tools. Oh and holding the driver head, more steady control is achieved by having it on the middle pad of your index finger and not on the last pad near you fingertip. Think thats it, I may be back later today....if you're lucky....or maybe unlucky as the case maybe 😄

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Neverenoughwatches - thank you so much for taking the time to reply. I’m coming to realise that I may eventually need more screwdrivers but that’s a way down the road for now.

I’ll definitely have a go at fitting the drivers to the movement I am working on though, and be a bit braver in creating the wedge to prevent bottoming out in the screw slot as that’s definitely what happens at the moment. 

Interesting about holding the screwdrivers as well. I too thought everyone can use a screwdriver, but it turns out not so much when working on such a small scale. I’ll try using the different part of the index finger  

I have been using a 600 grit diamond plate (which I use for my hobbyist hand tool woodworking) to dress the screwdrivers but I may try something a bit coarser. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • welcome to the forum, @akira7799 you could also go for this spring, available at Cousins:   I sometimes find that it's good to go down in strength (height or thickness) ever so slightly, when going from an old spring to a new S-shaped one + upgrading to new synthetic lubricants. You may otherwise risk re-banking (if everything else in the movement is doing well).  
    • If possible, could you tell me the spring size of this? I have a clock of this type.
    • It all depends how much you're willing to spend and if you're happy to try the old mainspring and see what results you get with the possibility of having to swap it at a later stage. The key sizes are the height and thickness with some flexibility on the length depending on the barrel size. If you look at the likes of Cousins for springs around the GR4486 Edit There are still some GR4486 out their. https://www.ebay.com/itm/126715574424?ff3=2&toolid=10044&customid=&lgeo=1&vectorid=229508&item=126715574424&ufes_redirect=true
    • Older mainsprings look like that. The S shaped mainspring is a modern invention that is, as far as I know, better at providing the same torque across all states of wind. By modern I mean 1950-ish (someone will correct me on that I'm sure). Your old spring looks ok to my eyes: no kinks, healthy space between the coils. I'd just put it back, though others might replace it.
    • Hi All! I have an ST1686 that I am tearing down and rebuilding for my first service.  I got down to the mainspring barrel and opened it.  It was pretty dirty, so I unwound it to clean.  But it didn't look like a mainspring typically would like this stock mainspring photo from Wikipedia.  It was only spiral coiled and didn't flatten out.  I've attached a photo to accompany my poor rookie explanation. If this is abnormal, I'll need to source a replacement.  I see that the ST1686 takes a GR4486, but the GR4486 is discontinued.  I'm able to source a new old stock (NOS) spring on eBay, but what would be a good modern alternative to the GR4486 1.60mm high x .10mm thick x 300mm long x 9mm barrel diameter?  Do I look for slightly longer spring? Thinner spring?  Thicker spring?  I know the height and barrel diameter should probably need to stay the same, right? As far as the barrel goes, how do you tell the difference between the machined ridge to hold the end of the mainspring and a broken piece of mainspring that's stuck inside of the barrel?  I've attached photos of the end of the mainspring and the inside of the barrel.  I appreciate the help since I have no bearing for what "normal" looks like. Thanks for the help in advance! Dave
×
×
  • Create New...