Jump to content

Cartier 81 how to check if it works?


Recommended Posts

Hi

The battery clamp was defect when i bought it. How can I test if the movement works before I buy a battery clamp?

Can I use a digital multimeter? 

There is reaction when I put the red and black needles on the battery + sign and on the upper end the magnet thing

IMG_20250106_152159874.jpg

IMG_20250106_152220127.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, AndyGSi said:

Just use a pair of metal tweezers to bridge between the battery and when the clamp connects.

Edit

I'd also look at alternatives before paying the Cartier price for one.

You mean like this? Nothing happened.

IMG_20250106_204023478.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Khan said:

You mean like this? Nothing happened.

IMG_20250106_204023478.jpg

Yes that's the idea but not sure if you'll need the correct size battery as I don't know if it is just the base that needs the +ve contact.

Have you got any other test equipment apart from a digital multimeter? Ideally it needs to be an analogue one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AndyGSi said:

Yes that's the idea but not sure if you'll need the correct size battery as I don't know if it is just the base that needs the +ve contact.

Have you got any other test equipment apart from a digital multimeter? Ideally it needs to be an analogue one.

I dont have the correct battery in stock, but know from previously it works with smaller battery. I unfortunately dont have analogue instrument. Hmm dont know what to do from here🙉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Cartier 81 is a 2 hand movement and pulses only once every 20 seconds.

If you don't have any other test equipment, adjust both of hands together, then connect the battery and wait for at least 1 minute and see if the hands moved apart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

I think the Cartier 81 is a 2 hand movement and pulses only once every 20 seconds.

If you don't have any other test equipment, adjust both of hands together, then connect the battery and wait for at least 1 minute and see if the hands moved apart.

Still not working🤐

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HectorLooi said:

Because the contacts are covered by the circuit board. And I wouldn't want to risk breaking the wires by jamming a probe into that little gap.

These are the coil connections.

image.png

Edited by AndyGSi
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

Yes. And you see the 2 thinner than hair wires protected by blobs of epoxy.

I wouldn't go probing anywhere near them.

Yes you have to be careful but that's what they're their for as this example below.

image.thumb.png.20934e16d5c5a4069e0da83cea27dd93.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe the circuit board is the problem? 

Because I see some wear on that circle to the left from the number in the bottom. 

Should I use the conductive pen here? 

IMG_20250110_214437309.jpg

IMG_20250110_214613098.jpg

And I have also checked the upper to sides of the coil with the digital meter, I guess its ohm to be checked? But no response.

IMG_20250110_222409812.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, AndyGSi said:

It does look like there's damage to the pad and track next to it but if the coil is open circuit then that's your first fault to resolve.

I bet you are right. On the right end of the coils, I see something irregular as if somebody smashed in a screwdriver. So I believe this is a very costly repair if I ever go on with it. 

IMG_20250110_230737638.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's nice to see when the coil is lacquered or resin coated. 

3 minutes ago, Khan said:

I bet you are right. On the right end of the coils, I see something irregular as if somebody smashed in a screwdriver. So I believe this is a very costly repair if I ever go on with it. 

IMG_20250110_230737638.jpg

If the break is near the end then there is a chance to reattach the coil from that point. It will affect the resistance.  I have never repaired one this way but I did have a go at unravelling one end a few years ago. Delicate steady handing cannot be overstated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • One of the pallet stones on today's movement (a Zim 2602.1) has assymetrical shellac. It looks to me that half the shellac has come away, although the stone appears to still be secure with the shellac that remains. I'm thinking I should probably repair this before I proceed. Is it likely to be successful if I add a little shellac and warm it until it melts? Is the existing shellac likely to melt at the same time and reflow with the new? Or should I remove all the existing shellac before applying new? (This will be only my second time applying shellac to a pallet.)
    • And it's still running this morning, great stuff!   I'm not sure I did the 'fix' correctly after looking at a couple more YouTube videos last night - got a feeling I removed the day wheel/star but probably the quickset rather than the day finger... I couldn't find the day finger seen on that diagram above, which I think is for different variant of the 6106 - mine is the c, so incorrectly removed the wrong (but also obsolete in the build) part. As long as it behaves ill probably leave it but thought I'd mention, more as a reminder to consider it if it misbehaves in the future... Thanks for all the help as always!
    • I was finally able to get my Nikon D3500 DSLR setup to use with my microscope.  I want to thank @GuyMontag for modifying his 3D printed microscope adapter design so I could get the camera image to focus properly.  The shorter adapter did the trick.  His new design file allows for the easy customization of the height. The setup I ended up with is a F mount to M42 lens adapter, a M42 to M42 mm focusing helicoid, and the 3D printed microscope adapter to connect the DSLR to the microscope. This setup gives a much better field of view than the microscope camera, with 0.35X camera mount, setup that I was using.  With minimum zoom, through the eyepieces I get a 57 mm field of view.  Through the DSLR, I get about 60 mm FOV.  There is vignetting in the corners, but I was rather expecting that.  My goal was to get the whole movement in the FOV, which wasn't happening with the microscope camera setup.
    • Hi Tom, thank you for the speedy reply. Yeah, following the instructions it will not allow me to change any of the subdials not in position 2 or 3. As for what you tell me in position 2 while holding the reset or start stop changing crown position only changes the hour hand as for position 3 same thing happens but it also moves the minute hand as it should. Am I missing something?  
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds,
×
×
  • Create New...