Jump to content

Hands not moving


SiZi

Recommended Posts

I’ve reassembled and lubricated a PUW 1461, and the beat error is within good range and the amplitude is reasonable to, so is the rate. However, nothing can be simple with these vintage watches as per my experience 🙂 so the final problem I am facing is that I can turn the watch hands with the crown and stem engaged, it’s super smooth nothing is interrupting movement etc. But, when I wind the watch and leave it the hands don’t move - I come back minutes or hours later to find the watch ticking but the hands haven’t moved. What could be causing this? Thanks, as always! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Yes, your assumption is wrong.  The cannon pinion is slipping. 

It should have sweep seconds. 

Screenshot_20241225_123556_OfficeSuite.jpg

Understood, thank you. I was wondering when I fit the cannon pinion why it was feeling super loose but I wasnt sure. This might be the issue. I’ll try tightening and report back 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reporting back after disassembly and reassembly. Everything seems to be in order. But the problem persists. So, I was curious to see if there was supposed to be a sweeping seconds hand (because I only have an hour and minutes hand that came with the watch), and it seems there is supposed to be a seconds hand - I tested by placing a seconds hand from another movement and it started moving. Ill need to find a seconds hand of the right size to complete this restoration, but in the meantime my question is that could it be because I am not putting the correct seconds hand that this is somehow not allowing the minutes and hours hands to move after I wind the watch up?

Thanks for your help!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SiZi said:

Reporting back after disassembly and reassembly. Everything seems to be in order. But the problem persists. So, I was curious to see if there was supposed to be a sweeping seconds hand (because I only have an hour and minutes hand that came with the watch), and it seems there is supposed to be a seconds hand - I tested by placing a seconds hand from another movement and it started moving. Ill need to find a seconds hand of the right size to complete this restoration, but in the meantime my question is that could it be because I am not putting the correct seconds hand that this is somehow not allowing the minutes and hours hands to move after I wind the watch up?

Thanks for your help!

An open ended cannon pinion will nearly always indicate that the movement was designed for a sweep second hand, we are talking mostly wristwatch here and from a point in time when this design became the norm.Exception would be an incorrect cannon pinion fitted. The sweep hand can move independently of the minute and hour hand. 

Lets have a nice picture of the movement's dial side that provides a platform for folk to help from.

Screenshot_20241229-090042_Chrome.jpg

What do we know about what the cannon pinion's function is ? To my mind it provides a way to tranfer what the center wheel is doing and convey that to us in an easy visual way, by movement of the minute hand. 

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/25/2024 at 2:14 PM, nevenbekriev said:

learn what is cannon pinion for and how it works

 

On 12/25/2024 at 2:30 PM, RichardHarris123 said:

Yes, your assumption is wrong.  The cannon pinion is slipping. 

 

On 12/25/2024 at 3:43 PM, oldhippy said:

Canon pinion problem

 

1 hour ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Did you tighten the canon pinion? 

 

@SiZi, it's pretty clear. Cannon pinion is too loose.

A clear sign is: if you can turn the crown (in time setting position) without noticeable resistance (e.g. turning easily with one finger running along the crown), it's too loose. Find a replacement or tighten it (not too difficult). 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cannon pinion does that by connecting to the center wheel's arbor on the opposite side of the wheel in this common design. But it connects in a way that also allows another function to be performed....which is......?

.....to enable us to set the time.

How does it enable us to set the time......?

...it enables us to set the time...by the way it connects to the center wheel....Not in a solid permanent way....but in a way that it can be turned and turn the hands without it putting strain on the center wheel and the train...And it does that by way of a friction fit...a friction fit that needs to be the correct amount of friction or thereabouts. That friction can be felt by us through the crown when setting the time...we are feeling the actual friction present between the cannon pinion and the center-wheel's arbor.

So a distinct lack of friction between the cannon pinion and the center wheel arbor can be easily identified by a very loose feel of the crown action during time setting. But why can it be that the lack of friction also might mean that the hands will not move ?.....what is it that is holding the hands still when the center wheel is still turning ?....anyone want to take over...my breakfast in bed is on its way 😅

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see now - the crown and stem engage with the canon pinion through a different set of wheels than the gear train. So it’s possible for the hands to move when I use the crown and stem vs the gear train.
The canon pinion does not easily slide over the pivot of the centre wheel - I need to push it and there is a perceptible click when it sits in place. So I assumed that it was a good fit. However after reading all your comments and watching the video it seems the symptoms I am experiencing are typical to a loose canon pinion (including a very easily moving hand when I use the crown and stem). So, I’ll try tightening a bit and rechecking. Thank you, as always! I’ll report back ASAP!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, SiZi said:

So it’s possible for the hands to move when I use the crown and stem vs the gear train.

Correct, this is when the crown is pulled to the time setting mode and as you surmised...the stem engages with the wheels of the motion works that turn the hands. The train should be unaffected as the rotational friction of the cannon pinion allows it to slip on the centerwheel arbor. Too much friction and the gear train could be strained.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • welcome to the forum, @akira7799 you could also go for this spring, available at Cousins:   I sometimes find that it's good to go down in strength (height or thickness) ever so slightly, when going from an old spring to a new S-shaped one + upgrading to new synthetic lubricants. You may otherwise risk re-banking (if everything else in the movement is doing well).  
    • If possible, could you tell me the spring size of this? I have a clock of this type.
    • It all depends how much you're willing to spend and if you're happy to try the old mainspring and see what results you get with the possibility of having to swap it at a later stage. The key sizes are the height and thickness with some flexibility on the length depending on the barrel size. If you look at the likes of Cousins for springs around the GR4486 Edit There are still some GR4486 out their. https://www.ebay.com/itm/126715574424?ff3=2&toolid=10044&customid=&lgeo=1&vectorid=229508&item=126715574424&ufes_redirect=true
    • Older mainsprings look like that. The S shaped mainspring is a modern invention that is, as far as I know, better at providing the same torque across all states of wind. By modern I mean 1950-ish (someone will correct me on that I'm sure). Your old spring looks ok to my eyes: no kinks, healthy space between the coils. I'd just put it back, though others might replace it.
    • Hi All! I have an ST1686 that I am tearing down and rebuilding for my first service.  I got down to the mainspring barrel and opened it.  It was pretty dirty, so I unwound it to clean.  But it didn't look like a mainspring typically would like this stock mainspring photo from Wikipedia.  It was only spiral coiled and didn't flatten out.  I've attached a photo to accompany my poor rookie explanation. If this is abnormal, I'll need to source a replacement.  I see that the ST1686 takes a GR4486, but the GR4486 is discontinued.  I'm able to source a new old stock (NOS) spring on eBay, but what would be a good modern alternative to the GR4486 1.60mm high x .10mm thick x 300mm long x 9mm barrel diameter?  Do I look for slightly longer spring? Thinner spring?  Thicker spring?  I know the height and barrel diameter should probably need to stay the same, right? As far as the barrel goes, how do you tell the difference between the machined ridge to hold the end of the mainspring and a broken piece of mainspring that's stuck inside of the barrel?  I've attached photos of the end of the mainspring and the inside of the barrel.  I appreciate the help since I have no bearing for what "normal" looks like. Thanks for the help in advance! Dave
×
×
  • Create New...