Jump to content

How was this 1930's dial made?


PQR

Recommended Posts

Just out of curiosity, can anyone tell me how the beautiful embossed effect was produced on this dial?

a18ef628-dd08-4975-a79f-37bb84438e05.thumb.jpg.68aac5416276a971f584742d43a457ce.jpg

e88ac907-d81a-4c44-9cba-251ddf7c7ff4.thumb.jpg.07b06dc96ddf5593c3d951bfb5e4297b.jpg

0e145169-306b-4d4a-9a5a-1defc430dedd.thumb.jpg.021ba256e84376bacf39e05a7f4d7014.jpg

 

I was surprised on removing it to find that the pretty surface doesn't noticeably protrude above what looks like brass. Could it be engraving on a mass produced watch?

82df66b9-9902-4897-a596-a53dbb7e979c.thumb.jpg.ab3474c494e69a729e364c1ef9b6c043.jpg

3e7ff91b-619f-412b-9405-ad0199e08a61.thumb.jpg.e26d536e1b8bfbc5505c2e9af7ad0026.jpg

d622e27d-29b8-471b-bb2e-3bb8e0f92424.thumb.jpg.bfe23c8c78441c84d28068e2ffb8b17d.jpg

eb7dcb32-954c-4caa-8a4a-63dfe17feba0.thumb.jpg.3e5e427568f862765a273e4c5223ee18.jpg

The watch has a 10.5''' AS movement bearing the overlapping TR shield - I read in an old post from the late great Ranfft that ESA used this "almost only" in 1936. The case is a gold Dennison Cachecase hallmarked 1929. The watch was bought new in Newcastle, England, and the only other branding on it is a "Rotary" logo on the ratchet wheel.

aa0cf664-d7d6-444e-b70c-4fa188e38963.thumb.jpg.dedd67737035929eba322ba26f26cd66.jpg

fcd9dc6b-f0ea-42d0-bf19-d599012037d2.thumb.jpg.548973c899c809055dca2585e5e0fb55.jpgac3d53fb-2f43-49f8-bcb5-ecc08c1e8675.thumb.jpg.811dd0167ada97d45927c644b1cd95d4.jpg

d86c68a3-af3e-44c9-a869-b53678f9effa.thumb.jpg.84cbc0498cd35a13f1a39b1af632b2a0.jpg

 

Whether or not you have any insights on the dial, I hope you enjoyed the pictures! If the answer should be obvious, then forgive me but I am all the more eager to learn it. Thanks and best wishes!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, PQR said:

Just out of curiosity, can anyone tell me how the beautiful embossed effect was produced on this dial?

a18ef628-dd08-4975-a79f-37bb84438e05.thumb.jpg.68aac5416276a971f584742d43a457ce.jpg

e88ac907-d81a-4c44-9cba-251ddf7c7ff4.thumb.jpg.07b06dc96ddf5593c3d951bfb5e4297b.jpg

0e145169-306b-4d4a-9a5a-1defc430dedd.thumb.jpg.021ba256e84376bacf39e05a7f4d7014.jpg

 

I was surprised on removing it to find that the pretty surface doesn't noticeably protrude above what looks like brass. Could it be engraving on a mass produced watch?

82df66b9-9902-4897-a596-a53dbb7e979c.thumb.jpg.ab3474c494e69a729e364c1ef9b6c043.jpg

3e7ff91b-619f-412b-9405-ad0199e08a61.thumb.jpg.e26d536e1b8bfbc5505c2e9af7ad0026.jpg

d622e27d-29b8-471b-bb2e-3bb8e0f92424.thumb.jpg.bfe23c8c78441c84d28068e2ffb8b17d.jpg

eb7dcb32-954c-4caa-8a4a-63dfe17feba0.thumb.jpg.3e5e427568f862765a273e4c5223ee18.jpg

The watch has a 10.5''' AS movement bearing the overlapping TR shield - I read in an old post from the late great Ranfft that ESA used this "almost only" in 1936. The case is a gold Dennison Cachecase hallmarked 1929. The watch was bought new in Newcastle, England, and the only other branding on it is a "Rotary" logo on the ratchet wheel.

aa0cf664-d7d6-444e-b70c-4fa188e38963.thumb.jpg.dedd67737035929eba322ba26f26cd66.jpg

fcd9dc6b-f0ea-42d0-bf19-d599012037d2.thumb.jpg.548973c899c809055dca2585e5e0fb55.jpgac3d53fb-2f43-49f8-bcb5-ecc08c1e8675.thumb.jpg.811dd0167ada97d45927c644b1cd95d4.jpg

d86c68a3-af3e-44c9-a869-b53678f9effa.thumb.jpg.84cbc0498cd35a13f1a39b1af632b2a0.jpg

 

Whether or not you have any insights on the dial, I hope you enjoyed the pictures! If the answer should be obvious, then forgive me but I am all the more eager to learn it. Thanks and best wishes!

Its engine turned, known as a guillochè dial. Thats beautiful.

Yes you are correct its engraved but not by hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the type of dial you can clean up. All you need is a clean rubber and rub it over the dial and it will clean it. The name on the dial is the shop that sold it. As Neverenoughwatches has said it is guillochè if you type in guillochè into google and click on videos there are a few to watch to see how it is made. 

Edited by oldhippy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with praezis on this. That's stamped and painted with silvering. Look at the transitions between the high and low elements; the details shift with the topology, and the color is independent of it. Get too agressive with the cleaning, and you could very well find yourself learning how to silver dials. Resilvering very selectively like that dial seems pretty challenging to me, but I hate painting with a passion.

Edited by spectre6000
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, praezis said:

Really regret to have to disappoint you all 😭
Not this mass produced dial was made by Guilloche but the die was. Guilloche will not produce tiny pits, separated by crossing walls - but the contrary in the die will.

Frank

I didn't even know this was a thing, thanks for the correction Frank, can actually see the difference now  that you've explained it . Machine stamped ?

Must be , you can see the circular pattern quite clearly, still beautiful and skillful .

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, everyone, that makes sense. Being addicted to Youtube videos on watchmaking, I was familiar with engine turning but knew it would be far too expensive for this watch.

Next question: How was the stamping die produced, given 1930's technology? If the original is cut with something like a rose engine, the material would have to be too soft to stand much use as a stamp. I've spent a little while googling, and the best I found was here which suggests that there exists a process to slowly engrave a steel die (with a rotating tool?) from a hand-made master (makes me think of videos I've seen where pantographs are employed in dial making). 

If anyone knows about that, I'm still curious! 

On 12/6/2024 at 8:54 AM, oldhippy said:

This is the type of dial you can clean up. All you need is a clean rubber and rub it over the dial and it will clean it.

I believe you, but what is it that you can recognise about this dial that tells you it'll work here? I have just enough experience to know the general truth of the dire warnings about touching dials at all.

This was my Great Aunt's watch so I'm being very careful. At least I can stop the gold case from being its doom for one more generation! I'm busy servicing it - hopefully it'll be a nice talking point for my wife to wear on special occasions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was finally able to get my Nikon D3500 DSLR setup to use with my microscope.  I want to thank @GuyMontag for modifying his 3D printed microscope adapter design so I could get the camera image to focus properly.  The shorter adapter did the trick.  His new design file allows for the easy customization of the height. The setup I ended up with is a F mount to M42 lens adapter, a M42 to M42 mm focusing helicoid, and the 3D printed microscope adapter to connect the DSLR to the microscope. This setup gives a much better field of view than the microscope camera, with 0.35X camera mount, setup that I was using.  With minimum zoom, through the eyepieces I get a 57 mm field of view.  Through the DSLR, I get about 60 mm FOV.  There is vignetting in the corners, but I was rather expecting that.  My goal was to get the whole movement in the FOV, which wasn't happening with the microscope camera setup.
    • Hi Tom, thank you for the speedy reply. Yeah, following the instructions it will not allow me to change any of the subdials not in position 2 or 3. As for what you tell me in position 2 while holding the reset or start stop changing crown position only changes the hour hand as for position 3 same thing happens but it also moves the minute hand as it should. Am I missing something?  
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds,
    • notice my quote of me? sometimes in my long-winded messages things may be perhaps get lost. But there's a reference to the spring and the entire watch can stop which I believe you're having now? which is why when you're having a problematic running watch you do not put things on that you do not need. So for instance you can remove the bridge and remove the pinion and see if the watch will run.  the problem with this type of way of driving a secondhand is you end up with too much play between the driving gear and pinion. so basically that little tiny play in the pinion translates to the secondhand and the secondhand will drift around by quite a bit. so the spring has to provide enough force to keep the pinion in place but not to either stop the watch worst-case or reduce the amplitude down to an unacceptable amount.  
    • Hello everyone - this is my first post. I have a few older watches that need some TLC and I like to fix stuff, so this forum seems to be the perfect place for me!
×
×
  • Create New...