Jump to content

Junghans Pocket Watch Reference.


Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

If you fancy some Junghans pocket watch information have a look at my website:

 

http://dirkfassbender.de/movements-1.html

 

On the other hand I would be grateful if you have some informations which are maybe missing.

 

Junghans is not so well represented on the internet which I would like to change.

 

Best regards

Dirk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

If you fancy some Junghans pocket watch information have a look at my website:

 

http://dirkfassbender.de/movements-1.html

 

On the other hand I would be grateful if you have some informations which are maybe missing.

 

Junghans is not so well represented on the internet which I would like to change.

 

Best regards

Dirk

Hi Dirk interesting web site any idea what is the tablet being used for the Porcelain dial cleaning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

A little update.

 
After a hint and some research I have to add the 13''' women pocket watch movement Miss which after 1931 was base for the J53.
 
Those are still missing.
 
Model A
Model B
Model C
Miss
Goliath
J1
J8
J17a
J28/11
J28/20
J35a
J48
J49
J53
J55a
J05 - Fremdwerk Valjoux 330
J06 - Fremdwerk Valjoux 24
 
Any hints are most welcome.
Regards
Dirk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

A little update 

 

28-57ca97348e32a20ed050ab0d0.jpg

 

28-23e3aeb934a58a74236c5c4e1.jpg

 
Those are still missing.
 
Model A
Model B
Model C
Miss
Goliath
Ego 
Figaro
J1
J8 - that might be the Ego and later the model H
J17a
J28/11
J28/20
J35a
J48
J49
J53
J55a
J06 - Fremdwerk Valjoux 24
 
Any hints are most welcome.
Regards
Dirk
Edited by Cougarnaut
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
A little update: I withdrew the Ego and Figaro from the list as they are verifiable pocket watch types and not movements.
 
Those are still missing.
 
Model A
Model B
Model C
Miss
Goliath
J1
J8 - used in the Ego and later produced as model H
J17a
J28/11
J28/20
J35a
J48
J49
J53
J55a
J06 - Fremdwerk Valjoux 24
 
Any hints are most welcome.
Regards
Dirk
Edited by Cougarnaut
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
One less:
 
Those are still missing.
 
Model A
Model B
Model C
Miss
Goliath 26'''
J1- utopian, but hope dies last.
J8 - used in the Ego and later produced as model H
J17a
J28/11
J28/20
J35a
J48
J49
J53
J55a
J06  = Valjoux 24
 
Any hints are most welcome.
Regards
Dirk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Those are still missing.
 
Model A, got pictures from the Deutsche Uhrenmuseum, Furtwangen
Model B, got pictures from the Deutsche Uhrenmuseum, Furtwangen
Model C, got pictures from the Deutsche Uhrenmuseum, Furtwangen
Miss
Goliath 26''', got pictures from the Deutsche Uhrenmuseum, Furtwangen
J1- utopian, but hope dies last. got pictures from the Stadtmuseum Schramberg
J8 - used in the Ego and later produced as model H, my theory
J17a
J28/11
J28/20, got pictures from the Deutsche Uhrenmuseum, Furtwangen
J35a
J48
J49
J53
J55a
J06  = Valjoux 24
 
Any hints are most welcome.
Regards
Dirk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Those are still missing.

Miss, Junghans Katalog 1927
J8 - used in the Ego and later produced as model H, my theory
J17a
J35a
J48
J49
J55a
Figaro, Junghans Katalog 1923

I have added the "Figaro" again as it is mentioned in an article as a separate movement.
"Die Uhrmacherkunst" 1938, Nr. 18, Seite 244 - Schwingungszahlen deutscher Kleinuhren.

Any hints are most welcome.

Regards
Dirk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi,

I have constantly updated my information about Junghans pocket watches last year and lately I have started to search for serial numbers to maybe shed some light onto this subject.

First results here: http://dirkfassbender.de/serial-numbers.html

Any help is welcome. I look for low and high movement numbers and especially dedication engravings which could give hints for better dating Junghans pocket watches.

Best regards

Dirk

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi... I'm trying to get some info on my pocket watch but can't find anything relevant to it. Its a Junghan, inside the serial numbers that I can see are 15646/J29 a.... it's got a Swastika on it, I can't find a single watch like this so any help would be appreciated. Thanks.. Michele

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...