Jump to content

lubricating jewels in an ES95 movement


Recommended Posts

Hi there, 

Forgive me if this is not the correct forum for this question.  I have an old Majestime pocket watch that seems to have wheel jewels that are capped. I can't see the staff pivots through the top of the jewels. Is it possible that these jewels are not to be lubricated? 

I looked at the jewels through a microscope and cannot see any dried oil inside them. I wonder how to clean these types of jewels as well.

What do you think?

2024-11-15-11-41-45-807 2.JPG

2024-11-15-11-42-23-606 2.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum,enjoy. Lubrication is always an interesting debate amongst horologists. Personally you cannot go far wrong by using the range of MOEBIUS SYNT-HP lubricants.. If you go to Cousins Uk web site you will find all of the range variations explained. 
 

PS only purchase small quantities. 

Edited by clockboy
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Clockboy!

I will check out Cousin's website. 

My question might have been a bit vague. I can't see a way of extracting the caps from these jewels to expose the oil wells. I think the caps are staked down, and I think the only way I have to remove the caps is to use a jewling tool and remove the jewels from the main plate. It seems a bit much for a simple case of servicing the movement. The only way I have to lubricate them is to apply the oil through the pivot hole.  A small amount of debris is present in some of the jewel holes. Will an ultrasonic cleaner work to remove this gunk? Has anyone come across a movement like this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The idea of the little cutouts is that cleaning solution can get in and out. We've all seen jewels though that just won't come clean without a little help from pegwood, including cap jewels. I've had to disassemble these types of settings to get them properly clean, with a jeweling tool.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you for good advice. I got my beat error down to 0.2ms and it does start better
    • Thank you for your introduction and welcome to this friendly forum. We all look forward to your contributions and continued involvement.  If there is anything we can help you with don’t be afraid to ask. Nice clear photos can help a lot.
    • From the photo it looks as if the pivot has broken. If you add more shellac what is already there will melt. To be fair it all looks a mess.  
    • One of the pallet stones on today's movement (a Zim 2602.1) has assymetrical shellac. It looks to me that half the shellac has come away, although the stone appears to still be secure with the shellac that remains. I'm thinking I should probably repair this before I proceed. Is it likely to be successful if I add a little shellac and warm it until it melts? Is the existing shellac likely to melt at the same time and reflow with the new? Or should I remove all the existing shellac before applying new? (This will be only my second time applying shellac to a pallet.)
    • And it's still running this morning, great stuff!   I'm not sure I did the 'fix' correctly after looking at a couple more YouTube videos last night - got a feeling I removed the day wheel/star but probably the quickset rather than the day finger... I couldn't find the day finger seen on that diagram above, which I think is for different variant of the 6106 - mine is the c, so incorrectly removed the wrong (but also obsolete in the build) part. As long as it behaves ill probably leave it but thought I'd mention, more as a reminder to consider it if it misbehaves in the future... Thanks for all the help as always!
×
×
  • Create New...