Jump to content

1970 Junghans Starburst w726 transistor


Recommended Posts

Hello from Oztralia .. my name is AL and I am new to this forum ... I am on a mission to see if I can fix my 90 year old Mothers Junghans Starburst Wall Clock.

I may be asking a question that has been covered many times and I apologize if that is the case, these old clocks and their simple movements just give up when they are ready.

I sent the movement to my tech guy (not clock doctor) in Melbourne who has in fact repaired many of my circuit boards etc. and he did not claim to be able to fix it as it was not his typical line of work. He did however get the movement to work for all of 5 minutes using an AC122 resistor and did confirm everything else is working with the exception of that resistor which he pronounced as DOA/Faulty on an overseas purchase. I know I can put a quartz movement from Japan in as a replacement IF such a thing existed today in Australia with all the knockoff poor quality parts that are available to us but that is not what sits well with this Classic Clock if you know what I mean. Reading a few posts from you website, when the correct questions are asked, I am led to believe my Tech guy would need a Germanium Transistor but have no idea for sure as I can only Google possibilities.

Summary:- Am I to concede defeat as it has been 7 months so far ... OR ... is there a magical place I can purchase this resistor/s

Cheers AL 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/7/2024 at 6:08 PM, praezis said:

If you search the net for transistor AC122 you will find many.

Frank

Hi Frank and Thanks for the suggestion,

Sorry I may have worded things incorrectly. The ac122 is no good as it only ran for 5min, I am looking for the same germanium transistor that was used on the w726 movement back in the '70s or a modern equivalent as i believe it is the missing link for a working clock again. Do you or anybody else on the forum have some idea as to where I might find such a transistor? ... I see you are in Germany and that is where Junghans originated from so I have my fingers crossed.🫰👍

Cheers AL

On 9/7/2024 at 6:18 PM, RichardHarris123 said:

Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 

Cheers Richard ... Thanks

On 9/7/2024 at 8:10 PM, Nucejoe said:

Welcome to the WRT forum.

Cheers Nucejoe ... Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, OZtralia said:

The ac122 is no good as it only ran for 5min, I am looking for the same germanium transistor that was used on the w726 movement back in the '70s or a modern equivalent as i believe it is the missing link for a working clock again.

Germanium transistors have not been manufactured in a very long time.

There are many "new old stock" ones around, but many have degraded to the point they are useless.

The only way  to get a decent one is to buy a batch and go through them with a transistor tester, to see which actually work, then use the best one.

I have a batch of a dozen (I think) AC128 for a repair a couple of year ago; only three actually worked as they should, the others varied between very leaky and totally useless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, rjenkinsgb said:

The only way  to get a decent one is to buy a batch and go through them with a transistor tester, to see which actually work, then use the best one.

If you buy from a reputable supplier and not eBay then they'll have already done this.

Edit

Unless it's a reputable supplier that also has an eBay listing.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/254202098283

Edited by AndyGSi
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, praezis said:

At first I would not hesitate to try a silicium PNP transistor

Silicon transistors require a higher base bias; I found the original patents for the clock circuits, and those do not have any real bias to bring the base in to operating range, relying on the very low base voltage threshold and possibly even the leakage of the germanium devices.

It would not do any harm to try a PNP silicon device, though it looks unlikely that it would work if the circuits I found were accurate.

 

6 hours ago, AndyGSi said:

Unless it's a reputable supplier that also has an eBay listing.

Those are actually gain-graded devices - the higher gain ones they have should be perfect for the clock!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, rjenkinsgb said:

It would not do any harm to try a PNP silicon device, though it looks unlikely that it would work if the circuits I found were accurate.

I think if it's just running off a single 1.5V cell then you're right that there
wouldn't be sufficient voltage to operate with a silicon transistor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, it operates on single 1,5V battery, but the base is not driven by the battery, it is driven by the base coil, which generates voltage from the passing magnets through it. So, it is possible to use silicium transistor, but slight modification of the cirquit is needed as to add some bias to the base of transistor.

My first question will be if the coils are intact, as this is the main problem in such watches. You don't need more powerful transistor and there is no reason AC122 to last for only 5 mins. The resistance of the coils there should be several kiloohms and no big current can pass thru the transistor.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nevenbekriev said:

Yes, it operates on single 1,5V battery, but the base is not driven by the battery, it is driven by the base coil, which generates voltage from the passing magnets through it. So, it is possible to use silicium transistor, but slight modification of the cirquit is needed as to add some bias to the base of transistor.

My first question will be if the coils are intact, as this is the main problem in such watches. You don't need more powerful transistor and there is no reason AC122 to last for only 5 mins. The resistance of the coils there should be several kiloohms and no big current can pass thru the transistor.

This isn't a watch it's a wall clock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thank You all for your support on this problem of mine it is very much appreciated. To clarify a little more I have attached some images as I have absolutely no idea what is what when you go and get all technical on me but I am absorbing your one on one discussions with great interest. Andy's link to a UK ebay site shows germanium transistors NOS are available but what would the specs of my original one be so that I can buy one that might look different but do the job?       

image001.jpg

image002.jpg

IMG_20240921_091841.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • for this particular Seiko movements there is a special movement holder specifically for the sweep chronograph hand. It allows you to push the button in for returning to zero and hold it in place. While pushing the second hand on it the proper location. It also provides support underneath C don't knock the jewel allowed because it requires a lot of force to put the chronograph hand on. For instance this is why a lot of Swiss chronograph watches when you go to remove the hands they will disintegrate because they been put on with so much force that they basically are considered non-removable and in the service centers they would get an entire replacement hand kit which we do not get so chronograph hands need to go on typically very very tight as others have mentioned there's a lot of force on them when the returning to zero.
    • What does the side profile look like. Is that the correct seconds hand?
    • I've never worked on one with splines and that's what I've always done. In the past I've even just used a torx bit. Edit What size is the tube & crown?
    • This watch came from a watchmakers estate. It has an AS970 with a center sweep seconds hand. I am having an issue with the monocoque case where when I seat the crystal the watch stops. What is happening is that the seconds hand hits the top of the crystal (it has left a small indentation in the crystal where it has worn it away) and then the hands stop moving.  The movement goes into the case and then the crystal sits on top of the case, and then the bezel goes on over the crystal and is held in place with grub screws on the back of the watch.   The image below shows the underside of the crystal with what appears to be some sort of repair job to the crystal gasket. I’m guessing the crystal isn’t the original and because the crystal isn’t high enough to clear the seconds hand, some gasket material was glued to the crystal to increase the height of the crystal, but not by enough.    I’m guessing I won’t be able to source a replacement crystal, but if anyone knows where I can find this style of crystal can you give a link to them? If I can’t source a new crystal then I guess my next best solution is to try and add more or replace the current gasket with something thicker to get the crystal off of the seconds hand. Any suggestions as to 1) What kind of gasket should I use and where would I source it, and 2) would I need to glue it to the crystal like it currently is or can I just lay the gasket on the case and fit the crystal as normal?  
    • According to my own understanding of the matter, this watch has only one subdial and it is of the minute register. And, it has central chrono hand, which is not on subdial. So, You problem is the chrono hand... The most probable reason is that the hand is not firmly seated on the shaft. This is a regular problem of such hands as the shock when resetting is huge  so the friction between the shaft and the hand's bush sometimes gives and the hand's position on the shaft changes. The hand must be pressed really tight. If the hole of the bush is enlarged, it is possible to shrink it. The best way to do it is in a lathe's collet. In the service centers they often don't reuse the hands, but rather replace them in order to avoid such problem. Another reason may be the bush is loose in the hand. And, of course, the movement may be out of order.  
×
×
  • Create New...