Jump to content

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Jdg123 said:

How do I reduce the noise so I can uncheck the button again and get good readings? 

It seems you have solved your problem but if you still have a noise problem I wonder if some of it is line-frequency noise. You are using an amp that plugs into wall power. Whenever I add something to my setup that plugs into wall power, like a signal generator or scope, I get 60 Hz noise. I cured this by using a ground loop noise isolator. My unit is this: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B019393MV2/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o04_s00?ie=UTF8&th=1

I put this between the preamp and the computer and it solves the problem. The isolator takes 3.5 mm stereo cables but mono plugs work.

Edited by wlysenko
spelling error
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Jdg123 said:

pickup going through this guitar

I can additionally suggest that it removes the rubber insulation on the pickup, that works as a low pass filter and leaves out the most important frequencies for analysis in the WOS. The final captures are very clear that facilitates the work of WOS. Also I see on your Marshall amp, the tone control turned clockwise, if that raises the low frequencies, it should be on the other end. Good job.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wlysenko said:

It seems you have solved your problem but if you still have a noise problem I wonder if some of it is line-frequency noise. You are using an amp that plugs into wall power. Whenever I add something to my setup that plugs into wall power, like a signal generator or scope, I get 60 Hz noise. I cured this by using a ground loop noise isolator. My unit is this: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B019393MV2/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o04_s00?ie=UTF8&th=1

I put this between the preamp and the computer and it solves the problem. The isolator takes 3.5 mm stereo cables but mono plugs work.

I might look into that, thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Jdg123,

I sent your soundsample through my timing machine.
Unfiltered, it is very low and shows huge noise, exactly hum:

PCTM2.jpg.8c42e7ee0ac1ea9c5c177a8cb3bc360b.jpg

With filter on, evaluation is sufficient:

PCTM1.thumb.jpg.8dbf1adfe22c62032f6fda8c22300b27.jpg

Frank

Edited by praezis
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, praezis said:

Hi Jdg123,

I sent your soundsample through my timing machine.
Unfiltered, it is very low and shows huge noise, exactly hum:

PCTM2.jpg.8c42e7ee0ac1ea9c5c177a8cb3bc360b.jpg

With filter on, evaluation is sufficient:

PCTM1.thumb.jpg.8dbf1adfe22c62032f6fda8c22300b27.jpg

Frank

Hmm, not what Im seeing That recording looks like the one from the transistor mic or the regular piezo disc mic, and from a 2892 movement maybe.   They were noisy, the WOS I made was a bit worse, but seems to have a little higher gain.  Im curious to see a trace from a WOS that others have built.  I did notice that when I record on my laptop I get a weird hum when turned way up, but it doesn't do it on my other pc that I use in the shop.  Also until recently I did't have decent shielded cable, whenever you even pass your hand by the cable it would start to hum.   I bought some really nice cable but have been too lazy to put plugs on them yet, going to use xlr.  I will use it when I get the updated version done.

The 4th pic is without anything on the mic. 

The 5th pic is with a watch on the mic,

the 6th pic is with the amp turned off. 

The last pic is from the PC microphone (everything unplugged.)

Seems pretty decent.  This is in a noisy room with Florescent lights, 6 inches from my PC, connected with a very crappy, shielded cable. 

I am not sure how to get a decent reliable audio recording, perhaps I am doing something wrong.  It seems My amp is actually quieter than anything else I have plugged into this PC....  Maybe it is my sampling settings or something?  But all that being said I can not reproduce the hmm that you have in your screenshot.  What version of the software do you have, where did you get it?  My copy is different than yours.  Thanks so much!  I have tried a few different preamps so far, nothing has worked as well as this one, the WOS was very close and may have been better, I didn't have this new mic I made when I tested the WOS.  When I am not under all these lights things seem to quite down a little but not much.

My expeirance has been that regular disc piezos are sensitive but very noisy, the transistor amp is far worse, the vibrograf mic works great, and the last mic I made based on the vibrograf works better but has slightly lower signal strength, it picks up almost no background noise.

I see that others have got the transister ones to work but I have not been able to get decent results

I did notice something strange lately...  Im getting an odd "rubbing" "clicking" sound randomly, and even when there is nothing in the mic there sometimes will be a random increase overall in gain, then it levels back off.  Just started the other day.  I have been handling this board pretty roughly and trying different components so I figured I damaged something.  I also have been attaching and removing various sensors to it.  Strange

Thank you very much for your help and insight.

Screenshot 2021-04-06 19.58.28.png

Screenshot 2021-04-06 19.59.19.png

Screenshot 2021-04-06 19.59.42.png

Screenshot 2021-04-06 20.08.47.png

Screenshot 2021-04-06 20.15.17.png

Screenshot 2021-04-06 20.16.37.png

Screenshot 2021-04-06 20.25.35.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/5/2021 at 2:32 AM, Jdg123 said:

Tg seems to be able to handle your sample just fine.  There is a lot of low frequency noise, but the 3kHz high-pass filter takes care of it well.  There is a big glitch on the paperstrip about every 22 seconds, because that is when the audio sample loops.  The smaller glich about 17 seconds sounds like muffled thumping, as one gets when the microphone or watch is being moved.

image.thumb.png.38015fab0fbe0cbe01f10c4603a20340.png

Here is a spectrogram.  We can see the ticks, as well as lots of noise in the < 2kHz range, as well as something at about 16 kHz.

image.png.866e4af48ab8cc1eb94fda5ff83f1be1.png

Here's a closeup of the < 3kHz noise.  Definitely something very large at about 710 Hz.  I'm not sure what is going on at 1.9k and 1.1k.  Maybe the microphone holder is vibrating on the watch?  It seems like the movement is causing something to resonate one of two frequencies for an entire beat or more.

image.png.2066516f362926af5f354af5c3821dad.png

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, CWRNH said:

What version of the software do you have, where did you get it?  My copy is different than yours.  Thanks so much! 

I use PCTM (PC Timing Machine).

1 hour ago, xyzzy said:

Definitely something very large at about 710 Hz. 

That´s what I called hum on my scope, actually a bit higher than hum (I calculated 725 Hz from the scope picture).

Frank

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, xyzzy said:

Tg seems to be able to handle your sample just fine.  There is a lot of low frequency noise, but the 3kHz high-pass filter takes care of it well.  There is a big glitch on the paperstrip about every 22 seconds, because that is when the audio sample loops.  The smaller glich about 17 seconds sounds like muffled thumping, as one gets when the microphone or watch is being moved.

image.thumb.png.38015fab0fbe0cbe01f10c4603a20340.png

Here is a spectrogram.  We can see the ticks, as well as lots of noise in the < 2kHz range, as well as something at about 16 kHz.

image.png.866e4af48ab8cc1eb94fda5ff83f1be1.png

Here's a closeup of the < 3kHz noise.  Definitely something very large at about 710 Hz.  I'm not sure what is going on at 1.9k and 1.1k.  Maybe the microphone holder is vibrating on the watch?  It seems like the movement is causing something to resonate one of two frequencies for an entire beat or more.

That’s interesting, I did feel like TG did handle my signal better, but the functions on the watch o scope are cooler. + I think I got it working pretty well now.  
 

the watch sounds a bit weird and echo-y even when you hold it up to your ears. 
the watch Is held on the pick up with the pressure of the padding in the watchbox, I don’t think it would move or vibrate. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/2/2018 at 5:08 PM, guidovelasquez said:

Thanks for the very informative images.
I use a microphone from an old time machine. here goes the image and I can show you images of its interior.

5981511fd9780_WhatsAppImage2017-08-01at10_08_34PM.thumb.jpeg.8accca3420ec5641375ae2a7bbbb258a.jpeg

IMG_9387.JPG

H Guido, I have a microphone from vibrograf, could you share how did you change the original jack? Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/2/2018 at 5:08 PM, guidovelasquez said:

Thanks for the very informative images.
I use a microphone from an old time machine. here goes the image and I can show you images of its interior.

5981511fd9780_WhatsAppImage2017-08-01at10_08_34PM.thumb.jpeg.8accca3420ec5641375ae2a7bbbb258a.jpeg

IMG_9387.JPG

Hi Guido, I have a microphone from vibrograf, could you share how did you change the original jack? Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/2/2018 at 5:08 PM, guidovelasquez said:

Thanks for the very informative images.
I use a microphone from an old time machine. here goes the image and I can show you images of its interior.

5981511fd9780_WhatsAppImage2017-08-01at10_08_34PM.thumb.jpeg.8accca3420ec5641375ae2a7bbbb258a.jpeg

IMG_9387.JPG

Hi Guido, I have a microphone from vibrograf, could you share how did you change the original jack? Thank you

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Fred said:

how did you change the original jack?

Hi Fred,
about changing the Jack or connector. below I show photographs. It is actually very simple, the cable has a central wire that is the one that carries the signal and a shield that is the ground line.
I replaced the entire cable. At one end it has an RCA connector, from the original cable that I bought of good quality. in the other I placed the original connector of the Timing Machine, Elma, Made In Germany. The photographs go.

IMG_7222.thumb.JPG.9927283440720888923c27e81b370742.JPGIMG_7224.thumb.JPG.879ba199d3a173c73387bbf04fbdfea1.JPGIMG_7229.thumb.JPG.269491d514ba1fb86a6a65bcb52b5ec1.JPG

IMG_7235.thumb.JPG.0ba29ff22a559eaba3c889630a202ba9.JPG

IMG_7230.JPG

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/8/2021 at 10:21 PM, guidovelasquez said:

Hi Fred,
about changing the Jack or connector. below I show photographs. It is actually very simple, the cable has a central wire that is the one that carries the signal and a shield that is the ground line.
I replaced the entire cable. At one end it has an RCA connector, from the original cable that I bought of good quality. in the other I placed the original connector of the Timing Machine, Elma, Made In Germany. The photographs go.

IMG_7222.thumb.JPG.9927283440720888923c27e81b370742.JPGIMG_7224.thumb.JPG.879ba199d3a173c73387bbf04fbdfea1.JPGIMG_7229.thumb.JPG.269491d514ba1fb86a6a65bcb52b5ec1.JPG

IMG_7235.thumb.JPG.0ba29ff22a559eaba3c889630a202ba9.JPG

IMG_7230.JPG

Hi Guido, thanks a lot for the tips and pics, thats really what i needed. great pics

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I am wondering if someone can help me find the data sheets for this. Made by TI, probably in the mid to late 80s. I have many thousands of them, All NOS, in the TI packaging.... I asked TI, they were no help, I searched the web, nothing...

2021-04-14 21.22.57.jpg

2021-04-14 21.22.40.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Did the packaging have anything resembling any kind of numbers at all? Then was it just placed in a package or does it look like it actually came in the package?

It def is in the ti packaging but who knows if they belong there.  I have around 20 thousand of them.  The only other numbers on The packaging says SKB3843 and TI 741A also,  4 large boxes almost all of them are still sealed in individual packs of 500.  I would be happy to part with some if anyone wants some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, CWRNH said:

I would be happy to part with some if anyone wants some

Put a couple in an envelope and send them to me.  I will see if I can figure out what they are.  1) do some simple curve tracing, 2) crack one open and (hopefully) take a look at the die.  I will send you a pm with my address.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/18/2021 at 9:19 PM, LittleWatchShop said:

Put a couple in an envelope and send them to me.  I will see if I can figure out what they are.  1) do some simple curve tracing, 2) crack one open and (hopefully) take a look at the die.  I will send you a pm with my address.

I will put some in the mail to you when you PM me your address.  Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 4/7/2021 at 2:16 AM, xyzzy said:

Tg seems to be able to handle your sample just fine.  There is a lot of low frequency noise, but the 3kHz high-pass filter takes care of it well.  There is a big glitch on the paperstrip about every 22 seconds, because that is when the audio sample loops.  The smaller glich about 17 seconds sounds like muffled thumping, as one gets when the microphone or watch is being moved.

image.thumb.png.38015fab0fbe0cbe01f10c4603a20340.png

Here is a spectrogram.  We can see the ticks, as well as lots of noise in the < 2kHz range, as well as something at about 16 kHz.

image.png.866e4af48ab8cc1eb94fda5ff83f1be1.png

Here's a closeup of the < 3kHz noise.  Definitely something very large at about 710 Hz.  I'm not sure what is going on at 1.9k and 1.1k.  Maybe the microphone holder is vibrating on the watch?  It seems like the movement is causing something to resonate one of two frequencies for an entire beat or more.

image.png.2066516f362926af5f354af5c3821dad.png

What Spectrum analyzer are you using?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, guidovelasquez said:

The results are amazing. The best indicator of microphone and preamp performance is what is indicated by the blue circle on the eTimer. We have a very high signal-to-noise ratio. 49dB. Nice job @CWRNH

172412895_SNRNOISE.thumb.jpg.588b4db971b7a7487b3dac245d521cf8.jpg

Thank you, What is the common?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...