Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:
9 minutes ago, 24h said:

I did not have any decent piezos in my lab (hard to believe...I have everything else!), so I ordered some.

you can get maybe in small toys or musical cards. they also have quartz watches with an hour indicator. They are on the back cover of the watch.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, guidovelasquez said:

or musical cards

Yeah, something got in my head once and I bought a box of 50 Sonalert beepers.  They have three terminals (the extra is a feedback terminal) so you can make oscillators.  I tore one apart and stole the piezo.  It did not work well at all, and I think the problem was that it was pretty thick...perhaps to get a lot of output amplitude...dunno.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Still perfecting the final product...are the smaller ones 'more' sensitive?

Smaller ones seem to produce a "cleaner" and more accurate sound. Any size will work perfectly with TG or Watch-O-Scope but my goal was to get the best sound. As for the question of whether it's more sensitive? I'm not sure! I think the main takeaway from my testing is that if the disk is larger than the diameter of the surface that's making contact with the watch crown, you will pick up additional (unwanted) noise.

The 'pin' on my timing stand is ~6mm so I'd want to have something closer than that rather than overhang it with a 27mm disk.

Here are several recordings that compare 12mm and 27mm from two different watches. The pre-amp, and high-pass filter are the same on all files. I have not yet tried the method that Guido uses with a resistor and transistor. I think it will include even less static/noise.

https://mega.nz/file/dtYHXQqK#0cVkxw02t1NSl4VE3B0tn4pOoGLmTn3NAo5_Xx162N0

Edited by 24h
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, 24h said:

Smaller ones seem to produce a "cleaner" and more accurate sound. Any size will work perfectly with TG or Watch-O-Scope but my goal was to get the best sound. As for the question of whether it's more sensitive? I'm not sure! I think the main takeaway from my testing is that if the disk is larger than the diameter of the surface that's making contact with the watch crown, you will pick up additional (unwanted) noise.

The 'pin' on my timing stand is ~6mm so I'd want to have something closer than that rather than overhang it with a 27mm disk.

Here are several recordings that compare 12mm and 27mm from two different watches. The pre-amp, and high-pass filter are the same on all files. I have not yet tried the method that Guido uses with a resistor and transistor. I think it will include even less static/noise.

https://mega.nz/file/dtYHXQqK#0cVkxw02t1NSl4VE3B0tn4pOoGLmTn3NAo5_Xx162N0

I listened to them...sounds like the 27mm is saturating...at any rate, it is a greater amplitude--what I would expect with the larger vs. smaller.   I am not using the timing software, just looking at the output on my oscilloscope.  Can you show the waveforms for these to cases?  I think watch-o-scope will do that.

Another thing that one would expect.  When I modify the way I mount the piezo, I can change the sensitivity.  Less cantilever...lower amplitude.  This makes sense to me anyway.

Interesting stuff.

I will add an emitter follower and attenuate the output so that I can record it with my Tascam...on another day.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/7/2018 at 4:14 AM, matabog said:

Thank you for sharing this Matablog. Nice files, I did use 4- #10 wood screws to hold the frame and a 1/4" X 20 X 4.5" screw for the watch holder due to not being able to find a long  M6 screw. I still need to add the sensor to it. Here are some pictures of what I made. I also made a thumb screw for this as a M6 (file added Below) but ended up taping it out for the 1/4" X 20. 

Timegrapher Watch holder.jpg

Timegrapher Watch holder (2).jpg

Timegrapher Watch holder (3).jpg

M6 THUMB SCREW.stl

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CWRNH: Nothing I make works the first time. Time to begin troubleshooting. First thing to do is measure voltages at pins 4 and 7 on all ICs to see if they are getting the proper power. If you have a signal generator, attach it to the input and look at the output of the first stage, preferably with an oscilloscope, but a voltmeter will work. U5 getting warm is not a good sign. For me, that often means a ruined IC because of a wiring error.

LittleWatchShop: Why do you want to measure voltage with respect to the negative battery terminal and not ground?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, wlysenko said:

Why do you want to measure voltage with respect to the negative battery terminal and not ground?

I'm sure that LittleWatchShop Will be around a little bit give a better answer than mine. The problem we have is that he's using a virtual ground. That's because there's only one 9 V battery it probably would've been better used two 9 V batteries and have a real ground. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

I'm sure that LittleWatchShop Will be around a little bit give a better answer than mine. The problem we have is that he's using a virtual ground. That's because there's only one 9 V battery it probably would've been better used two 9 V batteries and have a real ground. 

@JohnR725gets to my reasoning...re virtual ground.  I want to measure with respect to a known potential.  The virtual ground circuit may be the issue. 

Edited by LittleWatchShop
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Measure the voltages at the pins of the LT1114 and post them here.  Measure with respect to the negative side of the battery.

When testing pins 7, Probes = Negative on Batt - , and Positive on pin 7

U5 = 8.99v, U2= 7v, U3= 7v, U4= 7V

When testing pins 4, Probes = Negative on Batt - , and Positive on pin 4

U5 = 8.99v, U2= 8.99v, U3= 8.99v, U4= 8.99v

9v exactly for input.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wlysenko said:

CWRNH: Nothing I make works the first time. Time to begin troubleshooting. First thing to do is measure voltages at pins 4 and 7 on all ICs to see if they are getting the proper power. If you have a signal generator, attach it to the input and look at the output of the first stage, preferably with an oscilloscope, but a voltmeter will work. U5 getting warm is not a good sign. For me, that often means a ruined IC because of a wiring error.

LittleWatchShop: Why do you want to measure voltage with respect to the negative battery terminal and not ground?

I can see the signal on the scope coming from the first IC pin 6 with power off.   Same as input signal, no change, which makes sense I guess because it is a buffer.  After that nothing on the rest.  I must have the floating ground wrong.  The only change I made from the original schematic was adding c19

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CWRNH said:

I can see the signal on the scope coming from the first IC pin 6 with power off.   Same as input signal, no change, which makes sense I guess because it is a buffer.  After that nothing on the rest.  I must have the floating ground wrong.  The only change I made from the original schematic was adding c19

I do have a couple signal generators and a few oscilloscopes.  I used the mic as my input though

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes I have that in my watch list a JUF if cheap enough I will have a go , if nothing else it will be good for spares
    • Less give a damn- more **BLEEP** it! …nice that it is keeping time I’ve done a couple of these (one with your assistance) and there’s a third that needs work on the tension between what drives the hands and the barrel. Did you have any issue with that? …and I saw Ranfft make a small comment in a thread re: pin pallets- a couple drops of Tillwich blu, let it run down the pins. It is good for 20 degrees of amplitude… I’m using this oil as a cheat code on my unmotivated Venus chrono…
    • This is a very sad day for the industry.. For most of us being amateurs the cost of replacing parts for ETA,s etc will be beyond affordability for the customers.   see full statement below   We have now received the decision from Judge Michael Green on whether or not the High Court has jurisdiction to hear our claim against Swatch, and sadly it is not the decision we had hoped for.   As we have pointed out in previous news items (see below),the rules that Judge Green had to apply strictly prevented him from examining in any way how the Swiss Court arrived at its verdict, even if it is blatantly obvious that the verdict is wrong.   As Swatch’s lawyer was summing up in the last few minutes oft he hearing, the Judge twice pinned him asking if it was alright if, as a result of the Swiss verdict, consumers had to pay 50% more for their watch repairs. After some stumbling, their lawyer’s reply was “Yes”, so  I am quite sure that Judge Green left his court fully aware that the Swiss verdict does not reflect the norms of British Competition Law. However, the rules simply do not allow him to take that simple fact into account.   Judge Green noted that our two arguments relating firstly to British Competition Law now being different from that of the EU, and secondly to the contention that the legality of the Authorised Service Networks has not been tested, had both been mentioned in the Swiss verdict. Because they had been mentioned, he felt that to allow us to argue them again would constitute re examining the Swiss case, and could not be allowed.   As to our claim that we were denied our right to be heard because our evidence was not considered, our lawyers had argued that the evidence we provided could not have been looked at because had the Swiss Court done so, it could not have reached the conclusion that it did. In his verdict, Judge Green highlighted general statements in the Swiss verdict that evidence had been looked at, and acknowledged the arguments we made to him, but again he considered that this was re-examining the Swiss verdict, and could not be permitted.   Our case has attracted considerable interest within the Legal community, and within minutes of the decision being made public we were approached for comment by one of the largest subscription news services, Global Competition Review. They asked us two very pertinent questions, and I reproduce them for you below along with our responses, as they neatly summarise the consequences arising from our case.   What are the key takeaways?   Enormous damage has been done to the fundamentals of UK and European Competition Law by the Swiss courts. It has always been the case that the effect on consumers and competition has to be considered in any decision making, but we now have a ruling that states even monopolists can remove wholesale markets from the supply chain without any consumer benefit based justification. Those entities looking to subvert Competition Law and exploit consumers for their own benefit will be looking at this very carefully.   Has the court made the wrong decision? If so, will you appeal?   The issue lies not with the High Court, but rather with cross border jurisdiction treaties that have no requirement in them for foreign jurisdictions applying UK law to take account of the Ratio Legis [a legal term for the fundamental reasoning why the law was written] of that law, and have no remedy within them for UK Courts to overcome decisions that clearly do not.    After eight years of work, and a very considerable sum in legal costs, I can not begin to tell you how disappointed I am at this outcome. For the time being, there is no further route through the British Courts that Cousins can follow. However, I promised that we would fight to the end, and that promise stands.   The UK is no longer part of the Lugano Convention, whose rules Judge Green has applied, and as yet nothing permanent has replaced it. The political tide turned against repair prevention by restricting supply of spare parts some time ago, and our efforts on behalf of the Watch Repair industry have resulted in high level contacts within several Government Departments. You can be sure that we will keep working to overcome this unjust situation that we now all find ourselves in.    I will keep you advised.   Kind regards   Anthony
    • Dell fancy a challenge🤣   https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/285785684626?itmmeta=01HT29WVJY21Q94C73GYHGBTFX&hash=item428a277a92:g:15YAAOSwNRVmBAUz&itmprp=enc%3AAQAJAAAA0DIe4QLQBW66rSyIMiyBuk8GY%2B86pQ%2BQnxGbcNq7egAGe5DIs9YMmiWJIbZtMSxwNJIiJxuojbq523IeUSBQ6pJEIQ0tfz2ChrBR03BksmKINyklg1IK4GAfAcYY9Hta9wVeSZSZN7ZCNAfZTgKs9c4%2BUIUZ3Qjc3QjUXDn2uPRo1FiYOEewMG5A26EXb%2BclBgrqtbOmM6P3bea%2F8ZImOAXNI1HtbmtMk84pIGoM6ISwaM1PKFuADtTFMccS5e3ZjndCbXYXHrW3CecsV0edw3M%3D|tkp%3ABk9SR8q588nQYw Darwin’s theory of evolution has not been proven to be absolutely.  😀 
    • A already know the size movement I have the problem is the dial a had purchased has a dimension 20.6mm wide a want to find a watch case that going to fit the dial perfectly 
×
×
  • Create New...