Jump to content

Hermle and Kundo electrochron - anniversary clocks


Recommended Posts


I just bought another two beautiful anniversary watches - Hermle and Kundo watch. Kundo is interesting... I tought that it will be quartz, but it's not... Well, the problem is that lower part is bended. The central shaft scrapes against the cup and the clock stops after a few rotations. I tried to straighten it, but failed. Can someone explain to me how to disassemble that lower part to get to the shaft? There are no screws. How can I remove the torsion spring? It's the same thing with Hermle... I know how to dissasembly torsion spring, but not the rest. The both clocks are from the same seller... 😞









Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great, thank you. It's very rare model from Kundo. Clock does not have main spring but electric motor... Interesting clock... But the lower part (part that hangs on the torsion spring) is the same as on the fully mechanical model. I think that the torsion spring is the same like on my other mechanical model. I simply don't understand how someone managed to bend that lower part. All the parts are made of brass and seem to me to be press pressed into each other. I don't have the courage to use force. 🙂 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry don’t have anything to do with quartz or electronic clocks but one looks to be mechanical, at the top of the torsion spring there should be either a screw or a pin holding the top block to the saddle once removed it will free the top block thus allowing the spring to be removed so I would imagine that the electrical one is the same , some torsion springs are all one piece IE the top and bottom blocks are press fitted to the spring others are screwed.


Edited by Dell
Forgot something
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • by the way this is very confusing to me? You have a 7s26a and you're comparing it to a 7s26b which is confusing to me because they're not the same? Watch companies are rather amusing when it comes the part numbers seemingly watches with similar  numbers as you're implying should be exactly identical but in this case they are very very dramatically different for instance the 7s26a balance part number is 0310 020 the 7s26b has a different part number 0310 197 as the part numbers are entirely different there must be a reason it noticed that I made two terms in the quote above in bold regulator pins are versus the etachron  system. In addition to changing the regulation part more than likely they change the hairspring. So this would typically main you wouldn't build a swap balance completes from one type to the other because they will be entirely different. this is where looking at the technical guide might yield some amusing information. you'll note in the 7s26b  service guide it explains what the difference is. It makes a reference to the balance staff which is totally inconsequential for this discussion. But the really big difference is the A  version has conventional regulator pins and the B  has is the Etachron  system. In @Jon excellent images up above he didn't explain something? if you look carefully at the images below you'll notice that the outer terminal curve is different  as a guest to accommodate the etachron  system it looks like the terminal curve is farther out. So yes exactly as the parts list indicates the balance completes will look different because they are different. Because they are different there are not interchangeable. so basically because the letter changes at the end in this particular case we end up with two separate balance completes as proven by the parts numbers. Balance completes that are entirely different to accommodate the regulation system conceivably with entirely different characteristics of timing as they are entirely different. So your observation of the balances are different shape is correct they are different.      
    • See, the problem with widening to a little bit wider diam is that the bit will 'grab' too much at a time and will get in too fast by itself, then it will stuck and break imediatey. If enlargening from 0.3 to 0.5 needed, complitelly different drill bit must be made - it must be similar to the ones they use for weapon cannons, with one cutting edge and with angle that will not cut fast. The other option is to enlarge the hole like they do on big lathes with cutter for internal turning, that will be small enough to get in the hole
    • Thanks for all the comments. I think I'll go back to restoring BMW motorcycles and making model steam engines.  Dave
    • Yep my thoughts the same,  i realised i slipped up with the smaller drill half way through. Out of curiosity if you had to widen a hole, could it be plugged and re- drilled ? 
    • I think that if this is a spring wire like piano string or similar, it will not break and  wili be srong enough. What You could do is to drill straight with 0.5 . Then it would be beter, but now it is good enough to do it with 0.3. See, the watchmaking is actually a piece of cake, just some practice and skills to develope needed and to believe in own strenghts
  • Create New...