Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I got a little 3D printed mainspring winder (8mm) I'm trying to wind the spring for a 10mm barrel. This a Zim2602. Am I breaking them because the winder is too small for the spring? Or is this a case of user bumbling?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, 8lackie said:

I got a little 3D printed mainspring winder (8mm) I'm trying to wind the spring for a 10mm barrel. This a Zim2602. Am I breaking them because the winder is too small for the spring? Or is this a case of user bumbling?

I think we need a bit more to go on 8lackie. But honestly you have probably already answered this. The second question answers the first question.  At pre school we learned to put different shaped blocks into holes of the same shape, round block into square hole  X square block into square hole _/   . At watchmaker's school, i suppose that practical exercise continues at a much much higher level , parts need to fit very precisely. And in watchmaking very precisely means working at measurements in low numbers of microns . My point is, a mainspring meant for a 10mm barrel may not fit in an 8mm mainspring winder and if it did fit its unlikely that it wil be happy about it ( or otherwise feels very happy and secure and does not want to leave without a fight ) Please rate if you found this information helpful or otherwise sarcastic 😅.  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

if it did fit its unlikely that it wil be happy about it

The interesting things you learn when you go to lectures on watch repair. For instance I remember somebody commenting that basically there's a limited quantity of time does that mainsprings can be inserted in the barrels from mainspring winders. This would be assuming that you're actually using the correct size and you're not torturing the mainspring by trying to insert it into a smaller size than it's supposed to go. Occasionally when you can't have the right size winder you try to cram the spring and you will find that the spring will be extremely unhappy and you will be unhappy with the results because you can really distort the mainspring even if you do get up to go in.

So yes it really is important to have the right size mainspring winder that suggest going to fit in and not torture the mainspring.

9 hours ago, 8lackie said:

Zim2602

Always nice to have a picture because there must be literally hundreds of thousands of different watches out there and it's really hard to memorize every single one of them so it's nice to see what you're dealing with.

https://17jewels.info/movements/z/zim/zim-2602/

9 hours ago, 8lackie said:

This a Zim2602. Am I breaking them because the winder is too small for the spring?

The interesting problem with sizing of things is. Things do not shrink in a linear fashion so as you get smaller tolerances become much much more critical. So as you found out yes trying to put something physically larger than the size is going to be a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@8lackie, we need to know the particular place the spring breaks - the internal end for example, and when exactly it breaks - when winding in the winder barrel, when transferring to the watch barrel... The problem in using too small winder barrel is that when transferred, the spring unwinds rapidly to the bigger barrel size and the shock it takes is really big.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Both broke at the arbor ends. the spring that looks particularly torqued is one I tried to wind by hand....more than once.

Both of these 2602's are cleaned and disassembled. I'm hoping to make one running movement.

DSCF3488.JPG

DSCF3495.JPG

7 hours ago, nevenbekriev said:

@8lackie, we need to know the particular place the spring breaks - the internal end for example, and when exactly it breaks - when winding in the winder barrel, when transferring to the watch barrel... The problem in using too small winder barrel is that when transferred, the spring unwinds rapidly to the bigger barrel size and the shock it takes is really big.

Color me learned. I wasn't aware of 'them' physics. I'll continue my efforts.

Edited by 8lackie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, 8lackie said:

Both broke at the arbor ends. the spring that looks particularly torqued is one I tried to wind by hand....more thank once.

Both of these 2602's are cleaned and dis-assymbled. I'm hoping to make one running movement.

DSCF3488.JPG

DSCF3495.JPG

Color me learned. I wasn't aware of 'them' physics. I'll continue my efforts.

Always learning and new knowledge to pick up 8lackie and the list of tools to make the work easier is an endless one. Stick with it , you will aquire more of both over time, no rush.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Getting one's hands dirty.  Well, today I decided to tear down and re assemble the ST36.  Certainly you experts have both written and read a lot about this Chinese clone of the ETA 6497.  All I can say is wow.  Timegrapher dial down reports +1 s/d 325 Amplitude .1ms BE and auto detect reports 21,600/52 degrees. HA! If they were all this easy!!   I then pivoted to a pet project.  My beloved Timex M cell purchased in 1983.  Mine has died but I have now a 3rd donor from eBay that seem to stop and start.  Just sitting quietly, for a week she will not budge and I lost interest.  This AM it was running.  So, I used my cheap oilers and my 9010 for the first time and dabbed the pivots I could see.  Seems like a front loader so...she was snapped back together and 5 hours later she is still running on my wrist.  I added Maintaining and Repairing Mechanical Watches, a Practical Guide by Mark W. Wiles to my ordered books.  Three should be a start.  The Hans Jendritzki book looks to be a bit harder to source.  I added it to my wish list.   And yes, the Bulova series and the WWII tech bulletin have been found.  The British Horological Institute's Treatise on The Practical Lubrication of Clocks and Watches is also printed and skimmed. But these dang Citizen 0421...perhaps more reading about the balance wheel and escapement.  I think this is my area of struggle.   Perhaps I should follow the advice, Japanese watches can be hard.  Swiss, easier.  I lucked into a AS 1586 in a Swiss Caravelle and a ETA 2372 in a Belfonte.  They both run but do lose time over 24 hours.  Likely gummy inside.  I don't tear them down because I fear if I ping something I will be hard pressed to find a replacement.  The pocket watch debate.  I have a Waltham 1425 movement from 1914 from eBay.  Practice movement for my Grandfather's 1425 should I muster the courage.  Looks like a lot of parts, screws, pieces.  I decided to inventory it and put it away.   Await books.  Will look for $10 no name Swiss watch movements. Oldhippy.  I won't mention my clocks.  I have a ST89 waiting as my first test.  I have to purchase some spring retainers, build a spring unwind tool, and likely more tools that don't cross over to watches.  I have often asked myself if I should start clocks first, then do watches.  But....I started watches.  And here I am.  An ST36 that runs great after three teardowns.  And 11DPs that thumb their nose at me.  I am trying to keep clocks as a "later" project.  
    • So this is what the crown should look like as without the washer you won't get the correct seal. https://www.ebay.com/itm/173867733552?var=472587544283 Edit Apologies, it looked like a stem extender but that is how it should look.  
    • This dude Bartosz is amazing. Bit of a renaissance man judging from the breadth of topics on his blog... https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/
    • I've used this technique from our host to print a "minute disc" for my jump hour watch:  
    • It‘s an Omega 166.0173. it’s just a regular crown, not screw down. Thanks, that’s what I was looking for! I already got a replacement stem on the way, looks like it’s only a matter of time until it snaps while winding. I‘ll service the movement so if there is any rust, I will see it. Don’t want the dust to make its way to the gear train.    You mean just the washer or gasket and then washer on top? Because the original crown definitely has just a rubber gasket or the washer got lost over the years. I‘m not sure if the stem actually got extended at some point, looks like the rust just thinned out the material quite a bit. It’s going to be replaced anyway. Fingers crossed it will come loose without snapping.
×
×
  • Create New...