Jump to content

Stereo Microscope


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

If you have a workbench that is appropriate for watch work with an eye loupe it will be too high for a microscope.

Indeed.  I have the traditional watchbenches, so I put my microscope on my electronics workbench.  I only use the microscope for fine work (balance, hairspring, etc.) and inspection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guy does make errors and to perfectly honest I was not listening to the magnification quotes but he does show how to achieve a good working space without  purchasing a specific microscope by using a Barlow lens. Wish I had known that before I purchased another scope!!.

The main point he is making is that owning a scope improves your your watch repairs. Parts that you thought were clean are not, hairsprings that you think are breathing perfectly are not etc etc.

Edited by clockboy
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, clockboy said:

 

The main point he is making is that owning a scope improves your your watch repairs. Parts that you thought were clean are not, hairsprings that you think are breathing perfectly are not etc etc.

Absolutely true. A lot of us say this all the time to beginners that are struggling. # can you actually see what you are doing ? # . Personally i think it SHOULD be one of the first purchases when starting, exactly as Alex stated. We all make mistakes as we are all human, Alex is great at what he does and provides fantastic information for beginners regardless of the odd hiccup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, CJMiller said:

This has probably been answered at some point in this thread, but I cant find it.

Anyway, how high is the eyepiece from the surface of the workbench? Will I be able to keep my current workbench and chair, or will I need a lower surface to put the eyepiece at a comfortable height? Thanks.

At a normal table height, it's good. I'm on the short side (5'6" / 1.6m), and I have to sit up straighter than I normally would, but that's probably a good thing. I could also just raise my chair a little...

To answer your other question, it varies depending on what you're doing. I'm currently set up with the 0.5X Barlow for maximum working distance, and 20X eyepiece (non-watchmaking work) but the height changes from there for focusing. I took a tape measure to it just now, and the center of they eyepiece (so eye height) 15 1/4" / 38.7cm.

Also, echoing the comments about his magnification math double counting the eyepieces. 45X is the quoted magnification as configured on the AmScope site with 10X eyepieces. The maximum magnification available with that scope head and without looking around for extra special lenses is 180X (2X Barlow, 20X eyepieces). That's just enough to see some of the larger microfauna (i.e. tardigrades), but not enough to see anything like bacteria. Long story short, it's the wrong tool for the job. A chef's knife where you need a scalpel and vice versa.

Edited by spectre6000
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, he certainly blew it when stating the magnification.  I hate it when videos spread bogus info, even if it's an honest mistake.  Makes it so much more confusing for people that are trying to figure this stuff out. 

Rather than hovering in front of the eyepieces, I got some eyecups for mine. Since I also have eyepieces that that have diopter adjustments,  I don't have to wear my glasses when using the scope. Makes it much more comfortable. The eyecups are not expensive, and I find the scope much more comfortable to use this way.

As to bench height, a watchmaker bench at 38 -40 inches is too tall, unless you have a very tall chair or are standing up. I set my adjustable bench at 30", it's lowest setting, and that works OK. I still have to adjust my chair height sometimes, depending on how I have the scope set up. 

Cheers!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

No. Zoom magnification range is 0.7 - 4.5. Multiplied by eyepiece magnification of 10X gives 7 - 45.

Heh, true as nuts you’re right. I went to go check my scope (I have the same head as his, just with the double arm). 

6 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Morning Gert, how are you matey ? Loved your latest video on the drowned seiko.  I will say though i prefer your verbal as opposed to the subtitles. I think your humor shows through better and your accent is great. Keep 'em coming  👍

Evening my man, going good hey. Just running around as it’s payday which suck if it’s your own business haha.

Yeah, I did a poll on my channel a few days ago and 80% of people wanted me yapping so I guess that’s what I’ll do on the next vid (which I’m busy with now). But thank you bud, much appreciated!

 

8 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

I'd  prefer to stay away from amscope as not great reviews,  the one i use is a swift but its the same as the amscope alex does not recommend.

The proper optical Amscopes are great. I’ve had mine for 7 years and no issues hey

13 minutes ago, dadistic said:

Rather than hovering in front of the eyepieces, I got some eyecups for mine. Since I also have eyepieces that that have diopter adjustments,  I don't have to wear my glasses when using the scope. Makes it much more comfortable. The eyecups are not expensive, and I find the scope much more comfortable to use this way.

100% agree on the eye cups, I use them as well. Perfect reference to rest my fore head against in despair when a freshly cleaned cap jewel joins its friends in never-to-be-found-again-ville.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, gbyleveldt said:

Evening my man, going good hey. Just running around as it’s payday which suck if it’s your own business haha.

Lol yep tell me about it, mine was yesterday. But now i have a large wad of cash in my back pocket to buy some more cool tools. I do need a better scope though and i am looking towards the one Alex reviewed, I'm just not keen on the amscope brand. But anything besides of good quality is going to empty that back pocket 🤔

1 hour ago, gbyleveldt said:

The proper optical Amscopes are great. I’ve had mine for 7 years and no issues hey

Which model matey ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, gbyleveldt said:

Cheers Gert. This is what i was looking at a while ago, not so sure now,  if they have changed the quality. The working distance is really low compared to mine. I have 250mm through all magnifcations. Only want to change as the x5 mag eyepiece has the same field of view as the x10 around 20mm . The x20 has half that. Not sure why the x5 doesn't give 40mm field of view ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dadistic said:

I hate it when videos spread bogus info, even if it's an honest mistake.  Makes it so much more confusing for people that are trying to figure this stuff out. 

Couldn't agree more! IMO, you do have a moral responsibility to check and double-check before you publish. It drives me nuts not being able to understand something despite giving it time and thought only to later find out it was all wrong. Especially when the information is presented with a tone of authority. If there's one thing I've learnt it is that if someone sounds like they really know what they're talking about, watch out!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, VWatchie said:

Couldn't agree more! IMO, you do have a moral responsibility to check and double-check before you publish. It drives me nuts not being able to understand something despite giving it time and thought only to later find out it was all wrong. Especially when the information is presented with a tone of authority. If there's one thing I've learnt it is that if someone sounds like they really know what they're talking about, watch out!

That makes me perfectly ok then 😆

3 hours ago, dadistic said:

Yeah, he certainly blew it when stating the magnification.  I hate it when videos spread bogus info, even if it's an honest mistake. 

🤔 a little harsh Dave, we all make mistakes mate.  Lets not affect anyone's reputation shall we. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all do. I make plenty, but I try to correct them, and I appreciate it when I'm educated by others.

These videos live forever,  very few are ever fixed.

If someone is watching these for "entertainment", no harm done. If, however, they are like me, and trying to educate themselves, then watching a video that is supposedly for educational purposes and the information that is presented is wrong,  then I get really annoyed. 

I spent a very long time trying to wade through all of the scattered and unhelpful info on these inspection scopes before I finally purchased one.  I was out of the electronics and electronics repair field before they were routinely used and available, so I had no experience with these types of microscopes. 

Trying to figure out how the lenses all worked together to get  a certain level of magnification, field of view, and working distance was not easy. I think I got it right, but it took me *years* before I was ready to pull the trigger. I didn't have, and certainly don't have now, the kind of money where I can afford to make a mistake on an expensive piece of equipment like a good scope. 

Muddying the waters is not helpful

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, dadistic said:

We all do. I make plenty, but I try to correct them, and I appreciate it when I'm educated by others.

These videos live forever,  very few are ever fixed.

If someone is watching these for "entertainment", no harm done. If, however, they are like me, and trying to educate themselves, then watching a video that is supposedly for educational purposes and the information that is presented is wrong,  then I get really annoyed. 

I spent a very long time trying to wade through all of the scattered and unhelpful info on these inspection scopes before I finally purchased one.  I was out of the electronics and electronics repair field before they were routinely used and available, so I had no experience with these types of microscopes. 

Trying to figure out how the lenses all worked together to get  a certain level of magnification, field of view, and working distance was not easy. I think I got it right, but it took me *years* before I was ready to pull the trigger. I didn't have, and certainly don't have now, the kind of money where I can afford to make a mistake on an expensive piece of equipment like a good scope. 

Muddying the waters is not helpful

 

I get that and you are right choosing a scope is not easy, I'm on with that at the moment and i wont go until i know i have it right. There is some very misleading info and video out there, my first big mistake came from just that. I would just hate to see any harm done when Alex made a simple boo boo. Anyway enough said lets us let this error disappear .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Cheers Gert. This is what i was looking at a while ago, not so sure now,  if they have changed the quality. The working distance is really low compared to mine. I have 250mm through all magnifcations. Only want to change as the x5 mag eyepiece has the same field of view as the x10 around 20mm . The x20 has half that. Not sure why the x5 doesn't give 40mm field of view ?

Yeah so mine came with 10x eye pieces as standard, but I did have to add the 0.5x Barlow lens at the bottom to give me the 200mm working distance (a critical item missing from the package I linked earlier). This whole combination gives me 3.5-22.5x in total (thanks @HectorLooifor making me check to make sure) and fully zoomed out I have around 50’ish mm FoV at 200m working distance. I posted pics in this thread a few months ago where I measured it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, gbyleveldt said:

Yeah so mine came with 10x eye pieces as standard, but I did have to add the 0.5x Barlow lens at the bottom to give me the 200mm working distance (a critical item missing from the package I linked earlier). This whole combination gives me 3.5-22.5x in total (thanks @HectorLooifor making me check to make sure) and fully zoomed out I have around 50’ish mm FoV at 200m working distance. I posted pics in this thread a few months ago where I measured it.

That sounds like the ideal working situation. Cheers matey. Unless something else spectacular pops up on ebay at an impossible to turn down price, I'm happy now to along with one like Alex and you use. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

That sounds like the ideal working situation. Cheers matey. Unless something else spectacular pops up on ebay at an impossible to turn down price, I'm happy now to along with one like Alex and you use. 

I think I mentioned it somewhere here, but I've been using this exact setup for my electronics repair business where I work with even smaller parts than you'd find in a typical watch. Having decent working height is critical here. It made my transition to this hobby pretty painless (as far as working under magnification). I've tried various loupes but geesh I think I would've called it quits with this hobby long ago if that was all that was available to me. The biggest benefit is depth perception using a stereo microsocope, something you don't have with a loupe (which refuses to stay in my eye socket in any case).

Edited by gbyleveldt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gbyleveldt said:

I think I mentioned it somewhere here, but I've been using this exact setup for my electronics repair business where I work with even smaller parts than you'd find in a typical watch. Having decent working height is critical here. It made my transition to this hobby pretty painless (as far as working under magnification). I've tried various loupes but geesh I think I would've called it quits with this hobby long ago if that was all that was available to me. The biggest benefit is depth perception using a stereo microsocope, something you don't have with a loupe (which refuses to stay in my eye socket in any case).

Same issue with me. A head wire for the loupe ?

Just now, Neverenoughwatches said:

Same issue with me. A head wire for the loupe ?

Two loupes and two wires ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, dadistic said:

the twin boom stand... will give you a good workout when you move it. 

Hear hear!

What are people using for eyecups? I keep thinking about getting some, but getting derailed by (a billion freaking things). They definitely seem like they'd help. @dadisticfor bringing it up most recently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No - not the watchmaster. The tanks are standalone - you manually move from US Wash to pre-rinse to US-Rinse. After the US Rinse I manually shake the basket to release some fluid and then it goes to the dryer, which does spin and heat (but the drips go into the machine). I guess my question is really around the heating temp (is 70°C reasonable) - I agree the Elmadry is expensive but I can likely find something much cheaper. Also in terms of productivity and consistency I'm trying to avoid the manual blowdrying method (although I agree it would work). I have a workflow that I try to stick to - and I have tasks that I like to do while the dryer is running...
    • After a bit of the Parrot Sketch with Cousins website the GS recommended 1.60 x 0.135 x 660 x 14.5 size appears in my shopping cart. I figured Cousins of all should have parts for these Smiths and of course they have many of them once I found where to look... Three days to the US, then assembly.  I shall update the results...
    • Not sure the following will help you @signcarverbut I made the following note in my book where I record my experiences and thoughts in watch repair. Replacing the arbor. Insert the arbor so that the arbor hook goes in where the innermost coil has its widest section (between the innermost and second innermost coil) to facilitate getting the arbor inside the innermost coil. Then, using brass tweezers, rotate the arbor so that the arbor hook goes into the eye of the innermost coil. I also made the following "ugly" illustration. With some movements, it's a very tight fit, for example, Vostok movements. Hope it helps!
    • Thanks for the replies guys, I think you are both right in what you say, I suppose the brand name on the front of the watch really doesn't have anything to do with what is going on inside. I did find quite a bit of information and background on the movement manufacturer which is actually quite fascinating so I will settle with that knowledge and move on to the next one I think. Thanks!
    • John's eyesight is usually better than mine.  You might not need to remove the balance & cock assembly, as its  the  outer coil that seems to be sticking, if so use a clean needle or oiler to seperate the two sticking coils, plenty of space there right after the bend of terminal curve for the needle.   Good luck        
×
×
  • Create New...