Jump to content

Stereo Microscope


Recommended Posts

You're very welcome :)

I know you've made your decision, which is good. But I'd just point out that my own preference - and that's all it is - is for a zoom setup rather than having to change lenses. That way, you have infinite control of the degree of zoom between lowest and highest, and can adjust so that whatever you're looking at just fills the view.

After I posted the above, I checked at work, found an Olympus very similar to the eBay one I posted that sold for $142, and had a play with it using an anatomical specimen. Brilliant image, loads of working room, etc. I just removed the two little spring clips which just lift out.

Then I tried one of the LapSun ones with the cold light LED ring. They are used in one of the neuroscience labs - they use them when they're operating on lab mice and rats. For an inexpensive Chinese microscope, I was very pleasantly surprised. Seriously thinking of getting one now, to be honest. :)

But whatever works for you is great, and reading Lee's reviews of the Brunel one was very interesting. You could even have the base clamped onto the desktop or screwed down, to stop it tipping forwards, if the counterweight wasn't sufficient. Enjoy the world of miniature :)

Not being familiar with microscopes, could I ask...

If I was to get a zoom microscope on a standard base. Is it feasible to think I could remove it from the stand & then make a custom long arm stand to fit it 2? Or does the microscope have to be a specific distance from the specimen it's viewing? Or would the zoom take care of that? Ie.. If the original stand supported the microscope approx 70mm away from the specimen, could it be attached to my custom stand 250mm away from the specimen & still focus fine?

Regards

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Dave :)

 

First, don't get focal length confused with zoom. The zoom, on a microscope, refers to the degree of magnification, while the focal length is essentially how far the bottom lens is from the object you're working on.

 

So when you FOCUS the microscope, it moves up and down, usually on a rack-and-pinion mechanism. When you ZOOM the microscope, the internal lenses change their configuration to increase or decrease the magnification factor, while the microscope itself doesn't move. And there's no need to change lenses with a zoom system.

 

Now, if you want to mount a microscope on a long arm (similar to the operating microscopes I use in surgery), you need a very strong mounting arm (the ones we use are multi-jointed on a VERY heavy stand) with enough counterweight to balance against the weight of the microscope itself PLUS the distance it is mounted away from the mounting point of the arm.  If you see what I mean.  The longer the mounting arm (i.e. the further away from the microscope itself the base of the arm is) the more counterweight you would need, OR a totally rigid mounting point.

 

Now where a lot of the expense arises in brands like Olympus, Zeiss (the ones I use at work are Zeiss), etc is in the optics that are designed to have a LONG focal length (using the term to mean working distance).  You will know from a watchmaker's eyeglass that the higher the magnification, the shorter the focal length, or to look at it another way (no pun intended) the closer you have to be to the work. Very expensive operating microscopes have working distances measured out to about 500mm or more, while maintaining magnifications up to 40x. And I can tell you, one cup of coffee before using one of those and your hands appear to shake like an earthquake!

 

The cheaper brands won't have the long working distance, but those advertised as stereo dissecting microscopes will have a reasonable working distance. The ones I linked to all have working distances of around 100-150mm at most.  But that is probably more than enough for what you need.

 

Is there any particular reason you want it on a long arm? The reason I ask is that there is usually plenty of room to work on watch movements etc under one of those dissecting microscopes. The LapSun one that our neurosciences lab uses has the benefit of a cold-light LED ring system as well. That's the one I think I'll get for myself. But I don't need it on a long arm.

 

Having just re-read your question (and apologies for the long-winded answer), the answer is no, you can't change the working distance of the microscope from say 70mm to 250mm. I assume you're talking about the vertical distance between the object and the lower lens - that's what is meant by working distance. If you DID want to mount the microscope on a longer arm, you'd need to mount the rack-and-pinion focusing system with the microscope, but also make sure that the microscope at half way up the rack is in focus. That gives you adjustment both ways.

 

The other thing to remember is that the eyepieces of microscopes like these are angled towards you, and you need to have the instrument at a comfortable height for you to lean slightly forward and have your eyes on the eyepieces. If you don't have that at a comfortable height, you will soon get a very stiff neck and a headache! (Said he, speaking from bitter experience).

 

Hope that all helps, and makes some kind of sense. :)

 

--
Pete, Brisbane
============
 

Edited by DrRock
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Dave :)

First, don't get focal length confused with zoom. The zoom, on a microscope, refers to the degree of magnification, while the focal length is essentially how far the bottom lens is from the object you're working on.

So when you FOCUS the microscope, it moves up and down, usually on a rack-and-pinion mechanism. When you ZOOM the microscope, the internal lenses change their configuration to increase or decrease the magnification factor, while the microscope itself doesn't move. And there's no need to change lenses with a zoom system.

Now, if you want to mount a microscope on a long arm (similar to the operating microscopes I use in surgery), you need a very strong mounting arm (the ones we use are multi-jointed on a VERY heavy stand) with enough counterweight to balance against the weight of the microscope itself PLUS the distance it is mounted away from the mounting point of the arm. If you see what I mean. The longer the mounting arm (i.e. the further away from the microscope itself the base of the arm is) the more counterweight you would need, OR a totally rigid mounting point.

Now where a lot of the expense arises in brands like Olympus, Zeiss (the ones I use at work are Zeiss), etc is in the optics that are designed to have a LONG focal length (using the term to mean working distance). You will know from a watchmaker's eyeglass that the higher the magnification, the shorter the focal length, or to look at it another way (no pun intended) the closer you have to be to the work. Very expensive operating microscopes have working distances measured out to about 500mm or more, while maintaining magnifications up to 40x. And I can tell you, one cup of coffee before using one of those and your hands appear to shake like an earthquake!

The cheaper brands won't have the long working distance, but those advertised as stereo dissecting microscopes will have a reasonable working distance. The ones I linked to all have working distances of around 100-150mm at most. But that is probably more than enough for what you need.

Is there any particular reason you want it on a long arm? The reason I ask is that there is usually plenty of room to work on watch movements etc under one of those dissecting microscopes. The LapSun one that our neurosciences lab uses has the benefit of a cold-light LED ring system as well. That's the one I think I'll get for myself. But I don't need it on a long arm.

Having just re-read your question (and apologies for the long-winded answer), the answer is no, you can't change the working distance of the microscope from say 70mm to 250mm. I assume you're talking about the vertical distance between the object and the lower lens - that's what is meant by working distance. If you DID want to mount the microscope on a longer arm, you'd need to mount the rack-and-pinion focusing system with the microscope, but also make sure that the microscope at half way up the rack is in focus. That gives you adjustment both ways.

The other thing to remember is that the eyepieces of microscopes like these are angled towards you, and you need to have the instrument at a comfortable height for you to lean slightly forward and have your eyes on the eyepieces. If you don't have that at a comfortable height, you will soon get a very stiff neck and a headache! (Said he, speaking from bitter experience).

Hope that all helps, and makes some kind of sense. :)

--

Pete, Brisbane

============

Thanks Pete, it took abit of explaining. But I think I've got a slim grasp now ☺

The reason for long arm is.. I assume that in normal use I would be attacking the watch from the side, tweesers etc. However, for screwdrivers I'd need to be coming from above, so I naturally thought I'd need to have clearance above to put a screwdriver?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah - sorry for the long-winded explanation! :)

 

I doubt you'd be using a microscope for using screwdrivers - at least, not from above - your hand would block vision. And you'd need very short screwdrivers.

 

I guess if you really want to use screwdrivers, you could put a watch on its side in a holder, and approach from the side with the screwdriver. But the use of a microscope is probably a bit of overkill for that.

 

Now I'm most certainly no expert in the watch field, but I imagine most who use a microscope would be using it to (1) examine tiny parts, and (2) work on things like jewels etc. And for that, you'd be coming in from the sides with your instruments eg forceps, jewel picker uppers etc.

 

Anyone else who uses a microscope care to comment on what they actually use it for?

 

--
Pete, Brisbane
============
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you'll find that Mark is using a really good camera suspended vertically over the work, and with a macro lens that has a decent focal length (and therefore working distance). It would also have autofocus, if I'm not mistaken.

 

--
Pete, Brisbane
============
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you'll find that Mark is using a really good camera suspended vertically over the work, and with a macro lens that has a decent focal length (and therefore working distance). It would also have autofocus, if I'm not mistaken.

--

Pete, Brisbane

============

Your probably not mistaken. But in an ideal world that would be the kind of view I'd like the microscope to give me.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't usually use my microscope in general disassembly or reassembly; for that I use a clip on magnifier attached to my glasses that has a lens for each eye so I retain stereo vision.

The microscope comes into its own for inspection, oiling, and hairspring work, where the higher magnification really makes a difference. It's also great for detailed cleaning and restoration on dials partly because of the magnification but also peering down a microscope cuts out all of the peripheral distractions so your total focus is on the job in hand.

 

I do use a conventional loupe as well but that tends to be for inspection only as I find working without the ability to properly judge distance is less than ideal. Also, I work at desk height rather than bench height (something that I have to sort out as it's not so good for my back) which means that I am above the work, where the screw drivers need to be, so higher magnification loupes (with correspondingly closer working distances) are less than practical. As and when I eventually get a bench sorted out loupes may become a more viable proposition. What I have in mind is to have the working surface more or less at shoulder height when I am sitting upright. This would place the work in front of my eyes not below so there would be no competition for space with tools.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the risk of sounding facetious - my wife just bought one of these:

 

http://www.zeiss.com/meditec/en_de/products---solutions/spine-surgery/surgical-microscopes/opmi-pentero-900.html#highlights

 

But just in case you think I'm a lucky fella - she runs the operating suite at one of the biggest hospitals here - and the one where I operate. This is very similar to the one I use.

 

Oh - in case you were thinking of buying one, the working distance, even at full magnification, is about 535mm.

 

Oh yes - the little matter of the cost.... $1 change from $400,000  ;)

 

Wonder what it would be like to work on a watch under one of those, instead of somebody's brain arteries?

 

Sorry - couldn't resist it :)

 

Personally, I'm going to get myself one of those LapSun jobs for $340-odd dollars. I just love working on tiny little things!

Edited by DrRock
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the risk of sounding facetious - my wife just bought one of these:

http://www.zeiss.com/meditec/en_de/products---solutions/spine-surgery/surgical-microscopes/opmi-pentero-900.html#highlights

But just in case you think I'm a lucky fella - she runs the operating suite at one of the biggest hospitals here - and the one where I operate. This is very similar to the one I use.

Oh - in case you were thinking of buying one, the working distance, even at full magnification, is about 535mm.

Oh yes - the little matter of the cost.... $1 change from $400,000 ;)

Wonder what it would be like to work on a watch under one of those, instead of somebody's brain arteries?

Sorry - couldn't resist it :)

Personally, I'm going to get myself one of those LapSun jobs for $340-odd dollars. I just love working on tiny little things!

Wow looks fantastic. Your wife & my wife must have been chatting, because mine to bought me a gift6d9468b40bc911d8728baec7c573042f.jpg she also managed to get $1 change. Unfortunately it was from $4 he he
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heheh - good point Marc :) And Dave - simple is sometimes best!

 

Sorry if my post came across as facetious. Sometimes my lame attempts at humour or irony can do that.

 

I've ordered one of those $340 LapSun scopes. There are others on eBay, but many have elevated bases, while the LapSun has a flat one. Also, I'm familiar with the LapSun as there are several in the lab at work as previously mentioned. While obviously not of the same quality as a Zeiss or Olympus etc, they are more than good enough for the scientists who are doing microsurgical procedures on mice. And for $340, they seem like a steal.

 

--
Pete, Brisbane
============
 

Edited by DrRock
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heheh - good point Marc :) And Dave - simple is sometimes best!

 

Sorry if my post came across as facetious. Sometimes my lame attempts at humour or irony can do that.

 

I've ordered one of those $340 LapSun scopes. There are others on eBay, but many have elevated bases, while the LapSun has a flat one. Also, I'm familiar with the LapSun as there are several in the lab at work as previously mentioned. While obviously not of the same quality as a Zeiss or Olympus etc, they are more than good enough for the scientists who are doing microsurgical procedures on mice. And for $340, they seem like a steal.

 

--

Pete, Brisbane

============

 

 

Can you post a link to the LapSun you purchased?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Blake - indeed I can. It's the middle one in my post on the previous page, but here it is again:

 

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/7X-45X-Industry-PCB-Inspection-Dissecting-Zoom-Power-Stereo-Microscope-LED-Lamp-/111349298384?pt=AU_Business_Industrial_Medical_Scientific_Equipment2&hash=item19ecef74d0

 

LapSun is the company that sells them - and the guys in the lab at work call them LapSuns. But as far as I recall, there isn't actually a brand name on them. They're probably a generic thing made in a Chinese factory, and possibly rebranded by other sellers.

 

--
Pete, Brisbane
============
 

Edited by DrRock
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...

Influenced by Lawson's post  'Carl Zeiss - Eye Mag Pro' I bought a cheaper 6x 350mm pair of Galilean binoculars from China.

 

post-374-0-50304400-1433352956.jpg

These are intended for dental use but any dentist trying to use a 6x magnification mutst have control of the head position far better than I can manage. The viewed object was wobbling by about 50% of the 45 mm field of view.

 

The optical quality is excellent and so I have turned them into a binocular microscope using a heavy duty flexible support with standard end pieces as sold for microphones.


post-374-0-86817500-1433352925_thumb.jpg

 

Here in the bench mode with a Benson Aquatite movement - ample working distance.
 

post-374-0-35122300-1433352938_thumb.jpg

The only work that was needed is shown: a support that fits firmly into the mike clip and a pair of eye cups with

adaptor rings to match the eyepieces of the binoculars.


post-374-0-87573400-1433352944_thumb.jpg

 

Here mounted on my lathe base-board for some micro-drilling.
 

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The support was made out of 30 mm ebonite rod turned down to 22 mm to fit the clip and cut out half-round at the base, then drilled to match the holes in the binocular bridge.

The Zeiss eye cups are from the seller jameslee on eBay. I had to adjust them with short inserts to reduce the inner diameter to that of the binoculars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Update. Ran into a winding problem since some desperate previous repair guy had fitted the wrong winding gear. Cousins had one ! Turns out the movement is the slightly different 022 - 18 Looks like the one LH screw fixing for the crown wheel got updated to the two screw style.
    • Didn't you see the impact on your time machine? 🙂 Nobody told me this / or read it in any books but whenever I have a reading like yours one of the first things I check is the plate screws and in the majority of the cases the readings get better after tightening them, smoothing out your curves. If they are tighten enough it makes no sense to tighten them more as it brings no benefit but excessive force might cause the screwheads to brake off. You have the feel for it after a while. I have seen cases where the plate screws were not tight on purpose just to sort out some end shake issues but needless to say that's not the right way to go. Plate screws must be tight enough  just like the critical screws in automotive otherwise you screw up the whole movement in my opinion. I must stress that this is only my own opinion and i am just a hobbyist. 
    • I remember when I was in school the instructor would use whale oil on some problematic little tiny ladies watches because he felt it was a better oil. then for my birthday on my friends gave me a bottle of vintage nye watch oil. Complete with the advertisement inside which I have scanned below and what I find interesting is it hasn't gone bad in the model and it is super super thin I'm guessing the viscosity of water basically. then somewhere in the discussion group within the last year or so somebody purchased one of these bottles off of eBay and was using it on their watch. After all a bottle watch oil is? Apparently it was an expensive I'm guessing or it's what they had or something no idea what the final outcome was other than I found it amusing. then somewhere in the Internet somewhat it made up this interesting chart down below. I believe the first natural oil is there 8000 oil. Notice the friction properties in the first two columns in other words it's really good at reducing friction better than anything else.  But it does have additional specifications like contact angle which is almost never found in any spec sheet which has to do with how likely it is to spread. Big numbers are bad in those two columns and you can see spreading test it's very bad. So basically it's a really outstanding oil for a short period of time before it spreads away and of course being natural it has a habit of probably going bad very soon the best oil of course is Elgin oil at least the second version of their oil very good at reducing friction and very good at staying wherever you place it and still very fluid oil viscosity wise. then one of the most famous oils of all Swiss 9010 that I personally don't like and don't use quite a ways down on the chart personally prefer 9020 which unfortunately is not listed on this chart. It slightly heavier viscosity and has a little nicer contact angle those more likely to stay wherever you put it versus 9010 which universally requires epilam if you would like to stay wherever you putting it. then if you're in the viscosities here's an interesting chart that I found on the discussion group. ou will note there some minor variations between the viscosities listed here and the chart up above which may be attributed to the difference in temperature  universally everything is supposed to be at 20° C and the chart up above is at 40° C. Because what becomes interesting on the chart is 8000 is listed out of viscosity of 95 which does agree with their technical information and the PDF for the oil lists at 40° it is 41 where up above the chart everything is either listed as 50 or light whatever that means? Then Elgin oil is listed on the chart in a clever interesting way. you look on the chart at a viscosity of 125 you'll find Dr. Tillwich LGN oil which is the synthetic version of Elgin oil. Many years ago they had a request and gathered up a whole bunch of samples and synthesize the oil and for a while it was available for sale although it was rather expensive I had seen a bottle for about $100. and as far as viscosities go it does appear to be right in both charts in other words at 20° it's 125 and at 40° it's 50. So unfortunately it brings up the problem of viscosity or better yet contact angle determines the spread ability of your lubrication unfortunately we typically don't get contact angle we just get viscosity. So the casual trend is a heavier oil tends to not spread although as we can see from looking at the chart that isn't hundred percent true. As far as reducing friction goes viscosity doesn't necessarily come into play here either. Or basically we don't have enough of the right tech sheets to make a real proper comparison.
    • Somewhere in the back of my mind i thought you had the jewelled seitz pivot gauge, i was just asking if you had this scaled pin gauge as well. I might have just made up that thought  H. 😅
    • Yes, but the idea was that the OP wanted to be able to measure the diameter of the jewel holes in his collection of unordered jewels. Also, depending on the type of micrometre used one has to be careful not to dent the very small pivots (< 0.12mm) when pinching them in the micrometre. In my experience, the JKA Feintaster is safe to use also when measuring very small pivots. I don't understand your question, which I think was for me, no?
×
×
  • Create New...