Jump to content

Certina Blue Ribbon "volvo"


rogart63

Recommended Posts

This is now part of my collection. Bought the watch at a car boot sale.  It was in good condition but didn't work. Broken mainspring.This watches where given to every employee at the Volvo factory in 1977. That was when Volvo celebrated there 50 anniversary. 1927-1977 . There are some different watches. All blue but different shades.  But can't say what the difference is? All are Certina blue ribbon. Inside is a Eta 2783 movement. And have put it on a original Tropic strap. 

post-644-0-84491000-1439234499_thumb.jpgpost-644-0-65386300-1439234487_thumb.jpgpost-644-0-38753200-1439234494_thumb.jpg

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Rogart, I don't know whether it's still of interest to you, but here is some additional information regarding your "50 years of Volvo" Certina: Volvo issued some 64,000 watches to employees not just in the factory but all around the world in order to celebrate "50 År Volvo - 1927 - 1977". Certina was at the time a prime supplier of watches to Volvo who issued them as 100,000-km-presents to valued customers. So it was quite natural that Volvo turned to Certina when it came to a gift for the celebration of Volvo's semi-centennial. 

Basically, there were two types of watches: for male employees, Volvo issued the Certina Blue Ribbon with a steel case, for women the Certina 'Mayfair' with a gilt one. The watches were taken from Certina's 1977 range. I don't know much about the 'Mayfair', but the 'Blue Ribbon' was actually equipped with an in-house movement, the well-developed 25-651/25-651M. I'm pretty sure that actually all Volvo watches were meant to be delivered with the in-house caliber. However, Certina's capacity at that time was at around 650,000 watches per year, and the production of mechanical movements was in the process of being wound down, so it's easy to see why an order the size of Volvo's, mopping up some ten percent of Certina's overall capacity, could not be fulfilled with in-house movements alone. 

Therefore Certina bought additional ETA movements (ETA 2783) which were refined and renamed "25-011". Because the arrangement of the date ring was slightly different, new dials needed to be used as well, with a slightly smaller date window aperture set slightly to the center when compared with the original dial. 

These dials were in a greenish hue (like in your watch) whereas the original ones were blue. Held next to each other, the differences between the two watches are easily discernible:

50_1379932325.jpg

50_1369913222.jpg

50_1465406244.jpg 

Enjoy your watch! I hope you brought it back to life!

Best regards

Andreas

PS: Do you drive a Volvo, too? ;-)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tomcat1960 said:

Rogart, I don't know whether it's still of interest to you, but here is some additional information regarding your "50 years of Volvo" Certina: Volvo issued some 64,000 watches to employees not just in the factory but all around the world in order to celebrate "50 År Volvo - 1927 - 1977". Certina was at the time a prime supplier of watches to Volvo who issued them as 100,000-km-presents to valued customers. So it was quite natural that Volvo turned to Certina when it came to a gift for the celebration of Volvo's semi-centennial. 

Basically, there were two types of watches: for male employees, Volvo issued the Certina Blue Ribbon with a steel case, for women the Certina 'Mayfair' with a gilt one. The watches were taken from Certina's 1977 range. I don't know much about the 'Mayfair', but the 'Blue Ribbon' was actually equipped with an in-house movement, the well-developed 25-651/25-651M. I'm pretty sure that actually all Volvo watches were meant to be delivered with the in-house caliber. However, Certina's capacity at that time was at around 650,000 watches per year, and the production of mechanical movements was in the process of being wound down, so it's easy to see why an order the size of Volvo's, mopping up some ten percent of Certina's overall capacity, could not be fulfilled with in-house movements alone. 

Therefore Certina bought additional ETA movements (ETA 2783) which were refined and renamed "25-011". Because the arrangement of the date ring was slightly different, new dials needed to be used as well, with a slightly smaller date window aperture set slightly to the center when compared with the original dial. 

These dials were in a greenish hue (like in your watch) whereas the original ones were blue. Held next to each other, the differences between the two watches are easily discernible:

50_1379932325.jpg

50_1369913222.jpg

50_1465406244.jpg 

Enjoy your watch! I hope you brought it back to life!

Best regards

Andreas

PS: Do you drive a Volvo, too? ;-)

Hi Andreas 

Very intresting to learn about how the watches was developed. And why there are two different versions. My Certina Volvo has left the building. It was sold to a friend that is a very keen Volvo fan. 

I see this watches a lot on Swedish auctions.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In the meantime whilst awaiting a better plan, please drop me a quick hello on my email. 
    • I looked at it like this, I've built a lot of stuff in my time, building structures and furniture,those are my creations and they will still be here way way after I'm gone. Traditional watchmakers felt the need to pass their knowledge on, ideas that they created . I assume with them as it is with me, leaving their mark on the earth, a way of being remembered. This creation of Mark's has brought thousands of people together to pass their knowledge around,  ideas that will continue to be used for lifetimes. Ideas that should continue to be procured. If for whatever reason the forum ceased to exist, not quite like Ranfft's, that didn't disappear but much less usable. Then that is sad, such a massive loss of communication between good people and a wealth of knowledge lost. There should be something in place for when that happens which could be next week, next year or in 10 years. Might not be a topical subject for a lot of folk or boardering on controversy, i did say i talk about stuff other people dont. But if you dont talk about it and something happens then you've lost it and you ain't gonna fix it .
    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
×
×
  • Create New...