Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm so confused with the winding of Mainsprings!  I have put one back in the barrel of a tiny Tissot 715 but haven't rebuilt the movement yet.  Now I think it may be in backwards or at least wound incorrectly.  I am now working on reassembling a Poljot 2409 movement and having just received my chinese mainspring winders - I was all set to get cracking with it.  

My initial query was in relation to the outer bridal which has two tabs on either side of the spring (like a 'T').  One catches on a notch in the outer edge of the bottom of the barrel and the other in a notch in the cap or lid of the barrel. If the bottom one is not notched in, and the top (cap) notch is, it won't snp shut because the spring is sitting proud due to the lower one not seated. So, question one is:

1. For this type of mainspring and barrel, does the lower tab on the bridal need to be seated in the notch in the barrel and the cap notch lined up also?  I ask because this is nigh on impossible to eyeball when fitting the wound spring to get it in the lower notch.

Question two is:

2. Winding the spring is confusing me because when I watch this video (same movement): here although winding in the same direction as I was, the spring is entering from the top, wheres as mine was entering from below - i.e. in the same rotation as the spring itself.  I must be doing something wrong.

Help!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Look carefully at the tube end?? It appears to me to have a fragment thread visible? Either that or a step just away from the end? I can imagine a chamfer, but a step seems odd - but I've never seen the tubes used on these.
    • This is a very valid point and a subtlety that I was unaware of until fairly recently, learning all the time, the video below explains this point well:  
    • You don't have to use his special tester. Any good multimeter would work.
    • Yes, it looks like GT Revue 30. Doctor, You can not replace escape wheel by the dimensions You listed. One needs to know much more things like number of leaves of the pinion and it's diameter, the position in high of the table and the pinion, the hight between the pivots, the exact pivots diameter... And then, even if suitable wheel is found, one will need to know how to adjust the pallets position correctly. Restoring antique movements is something different than replacing parts. In older movements parts are not interchangeable, this means spare parts do not exist. Here the case is different, but still escapement adjustment will be needed if a wheel from a donor is found. So may be it will be easier to restore the donor for You...Restoring antique movements usually means making of the parts needed and this requires knowlage and working on lathes skill. In this case repivoting of the wheel is the natural solution, but there is a long way that one must walk untill getting ready for such work.
    • I was looking at Essence of Renata, a chemical used a lot for cleaning hairsprings: "Specially prepared solution for degreasing watch and instrument components. Indispensable for degreasing hairsprings." Looking at the MSDS you can see this is just pure n-Heptane, so could be an option for those who don't want to use the chlorocarbons or hexane?     HF6013 - Horological Essence COSHH Safety Data Sheet Horological Essence_0.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...