Jump to content

First chronograph: 1972 Seiko 6139-6012


Recommended Posts

I've wanted a chrono for a while, and I found the Seiko "Bruce Lee" watches on eBay, and fell in love with the yellow dial.

Spent a few months looking around at watches in my price range, and they were mostly basket cases. Found this one in the UK, and despite having a black dial, it has the "railroad" bracelet I wanted and was in nice shape and in my price range, so I had to jump on it.

It runs after being wiggled around a little to wind up, so I'm taking that as a good start. Seller says the chrono start pusher doesn't work, and I can see why. Here are the disassembly pictures with where I'm at now. Took a break for the evening to keep watching Mark's chronograph course 🙂

20230515_110740(1).thumb.jpg.59a4fee9d5066f38582d95b27116e2b8.jpg20230515_111005(1).thumb.jpg.aba018e8f6234042105941c8e8b1c610.jpg20230516_153024(1).thumb.jpg.5a7a00b33f807d5ac113d8aad0540375.jpg20230516_153050(1).thumb.jpg.797f282f90611759f52566ffaf208deb.jpg20230516_153707(1).thumb.jpg.c65e0d620e8b6418a228123dca2ca717.jpg20230516_154100(1).thumb.jpg.7aede13511a68e1149a66391b3512688.jpg20230516_153457(1).thumb.jpg.f2d3d38d2956921ab16f08ad582d2581.jpg20230516_153631(1).thumb.jpg.dee23bfbbc26c735f06efd0f20a11670.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally remembered to check the timegrapher before disassembly! Looks like a solid starting point.

image.thumb.png.e3338b361a835a32371e2fe91c4aec67.png

More disassembly. Taking off the automatic works, the first thing I notice is different screws holding it down. An ominous start.

20230518_105818(1).thumb.jpg.39d4a87e3255c1822598d0a2f9519491.jpg

 

Although right below it, we may have found the correct screw, but also one with half rusted off. I was able to clean out the slot and very gently turn it out.

20230518_110330(1).thumb.jpg.7752472f067b0e0f30414a5ce252f0a1.jpg20230518_111911(1).thumb.jpg.b71a39aee3cc003496468916f90cf238.jpg

 

A little further down the movement, found a screw that is completely broken in half. I was luckily able to push on the corner of it to get it unscrewed.

20230518_112831(1).thumb.jpg.e842823593c663c24b75f8750801ee83.jpg20230518_113001(1).jpg.6485c64c94f75582dbd3f4b0fc03bebb.jpg

 

Dial side looked pretty good overall.

20230518_105636(1).thumb.jpg.de40ad7c6efd1f448bc7e5c2879e56ff.jpg

 

And here's the whole thing apart. There's a kink in the mainspring that I don't love, so I'll be replacing that. I also noticed a cracked upper pallet jewel, and some of the bushings have a lot of wear. If anyone has resources for replacement jewels, I'm all ears, otherwise it's research time.

20230518_115452(1).thumb.jpg.5b507801efa69acbba40ce6424f5611d.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ManSkirtBrew said:

I also noticed that this spring for the chronograph start lever is around the wrong lug, badly misshapen, and the lever itself is badly gummed up and sticky. That would explain why it doesn't start, and should be an easy fix.

20230518_112516(1).thumb.jpg.479b98cfbc5a151af26f9aed69cc69c6.jpg

That is the hammer spring for the reset pusher, not the chrono start/stop pusher spring.  That is the correct location for that spring.  I've made the same mistake before.  It actually works when installed in either location shown in your arrows, but the post for the chronograph bridge is technically not where that spring is suppose to go.  That spring is badly misshapen as you stated, but it is currently installed in the correct orientation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, thor447 said:

That is the correct location for that spring.

Interesting. I was using Mark's disassembly video as a reference, which shows it around the other post and I figured that would also explain why it was so misshapen:

image.png.ea26d38189baa89d80b9cdf40c97aa7f.png

 

And sorry for mis-naming it. I'm still learning all the bits and bobs in here! I also (embarrassingly) forgot that we're looking at the back of the movement and got the flyback and start buttons reversed in my head. 😳

Edited by ManSkirtBrew
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ManSkirtBrew said:

Interesting. I was using Mark's disassembly video as a reference, which shows it around the other post and I figured that would also explain why it was so misshapen:

image.png.ea26d38189baa89d80b9cdf40c97aa7f.png

 

And sorry for mis-naming it. I'm still learning all the bits and bobs in here! I also (embarrassingly) forgot that we're looking at the back of the movement and got the flyback and start buttons reversed in my head. 😳

I did this exact same thing on two watches, and both worked perfectly still.  A good friend of mine had a 6138-0040 Bullhead he purchased new in the 70's.  After it stopped running in the 90's he put it in a drawer and left it alone.  I was given the opportunity to do a service on that watch, which had never been opened prior, and can confirm that the spring was mounted not to the chrono bridge post, but to the column wheel lever post just below it in your picture.  In my (limited) experience, it appears to work in either location.  The manual is vague about this, as their graphic doesn't label that post, but judging by the closeness to the edge of the main plate, it looks like the column wheel lever post:

image.png.425fd1b5f27519750c2fb7a40d58c1f4.png

 

I made this same mistake on two of my YouTube videos, and a couple of people kindly pointed it out as well.  Here's a quick video showing me correcting this spring (although again it still works perfectly in either location - with a good spring):

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hah I just came back here because I watched Mark's re-assembly video of the same watch, and what do you know:

image.png.e31d6c03a3a7b56057fee783fce52c99.png

I'll check out yours as well, thank you!

Also, I have the 6139A and B manuals, but the B is just an addendum and doesn't have that nice image you posted. Any chance you have a link to a copy of that manual?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Parts movement arrived, and luckily most of the parts look a lot better than the original one. There's some wear around the barrel area so I'll be checking side shake there, but overall looks good.

Importantly it has the broken screws and spring I need in perfect shape.

Looks like we may have a Watch of Theseus situation here.

20230522_214529.thumb.jpg.b45ababf646d44ce013603da89b4dcb4.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm doing close inspection on the parts to pick the best ones, and the barrel bridge from the original has a chipped jewel and that repair on it, so I'm using the other one. Only problem is there's some wear around the edge of the bushing in the center for the center chrono wheel.

The oil cup side looks perfect, but the wheel side looks like it's been poked with a pivot a few times.

It doesn't look like it's going to be a problem, but I was wondering if there are any techniques for cleaning it up a bit or burnishing the edges so it won't wear the pivots. I know the pivots are much harder than the bushing, but I still want to ask you more experienced friends.

The other option is of course pressing it out and replacing it with a jewel, but is that overkill?

image.png.d5d8c74b67704c1a840770a7dada6def.png

image.png.6b9b7f1c3cc2c2770d52e55c64dc7432.png

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

After a long wait for parts and tools, I'm back to work on this guy. Decided to try reaming out the barrel pivot hole in the main plate for a jewel.

Never done this before, so I tried it out on the plate that I'm not planning to use.

Ended up getting a reamer holder for my K&D staking set. I bought it and reamers from 1.09 up to the 1.59 that I need from Dave's Watch Parts.

So I took my time and went through each 0.10mm step, then deburred it with a 3/32" Dremel engraving tool in a pin vise. Worked an absolute treat. I may have gotten a little overzealous with the chamfer, but this is why I tried it here first.

You can see in the first photo just how oval this hole was when I started.

20230703_114554(1).thumb.jpg.d03c27cff25aa867e99c2e296d9cf119.jpg

20230703_121728(1).thumb.jpg.1d577fee7b5de4cf78a90cafe12a171a.jpg

20230703_121751(1).thumb.jpg.1acb6e84618b3dcb2085398c2be2559b.jpg

20230703_122200(1).thumb.jpg.ec1aab5dbcf50f2df54f0b8055746872.jpg

20230703_122324(1).jpg.d2efd492d8d34cd9dfe14d50c50192e9.jpg

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why yes, that is a crack in the jewel that I only noticed after installation.

I assume this is not the kind of crack one can ignore. I've already reached out to the seller to see if I can get a replacement.

I'm also have to acknowledge this probably happened during installation. I reamed it to the proper 1.59mm, deburred, Rodico and cleaning in hexane, and pressed in flat with a Seitz tool. What might I have done wrong?

20230703_145626.thumb.png.adf6caeefefb82ebd86763d96015e856.png

Edit for a couple more pictures through the microscope.

 

Raw Photo.png

Raw Photo(1).png

Edited by ManSkirtBrew
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Malocchio said:

I've cracked one of those jewels. The hole was just a little bit too small when I tried to push the jewel in. 

This is my instinct. I ran the 1.59mm reamer all the way up to the solid part shaft, but maybe I should have burnished it some more? The jewel slid in with what I'd consider very little pressure.

In fact, I just installed the upper jewel and it required a lot more force to push in, by comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, ManSkirtBrew said:

This is my instinct. I ran the 1.59mm reamer all the way up to the solid part shaft, but maybe I should have burnished it some more? The jewel slid in with what I'd consider very little pressure.

In fact, I just installed the upper jewel and it required a lot more force to push in, by comparison.

If the jewel slid in without force I don't think the hole was too small. I don't run the reamer all the way, just the blade part through the plate. I'm afraid the reamer might get stuck and if it gets stuck, you might end up with a too big hole and the jewel falls through. Happened to me once. I'm glad it was a 6309, those main plates are plentiful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I'm waiting for the seller, I decided to put it back together with the cracked jewel to see where I'm at, and get practice assembling the chronograph.

Timegrapher looks solid other than the low-ish amplitude. I have a feeling it's at least partly because I realized after I got the lower balance jewel in that what I thought was 9010 in my oil cup was actually HP1300/9104 😵‍💫  I may also replace the mainspring, because why not?

So when I get the new jewels I'll take the whole thing apart and re-clean and lubricate.

BUT it works, as does the chronograph. So that's pretty exciting 🙂

I've been trying to find o-rings for the pushers and stem. Any suggestions on where to find those?

image.thumb.png.9a0830be11c0e7caa666790e330529bf.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I put it back together and cased it up without the automatic works to get an idea of the reserve, and so I can wear it for a day or two. Wound at 10pm EST 🙂

20230710_220459.thumb.jpg.d8c5e3fb19d40da2eccaf8c3628f9adf.jpg

The second and chrono minute hands have been really poorly painted red, and I'm fairly certain the dial is a refinish. The price I paid kind of reflects that, so I'm not too upset about it. I'm not looking for a perfect collector's piece anyway.

It'll give me an opportunity to try my hand at refinishing hands.

That is a lot of lint!Sure looks good on the wrist, though.

20230710_223320.thumb.jpg.550b79eac2ebcfdffb0777559d204fac.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/vE-nsV6jYMQ

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sounds great! And yes, I would use grease for the keyless as well although treating the parts with epilame would make the grease less likely to spread in the long run. Not critical but won’t hurt. My current strategy is to epilame treat all parts getting in contact with oil or grease.
    • Hello everyone, for what it's worth, here is my approach: 1. Escape wheel submerged in Epilame, then dried quickly with a hairdryer. Then the final tip of the pivots are cleaned by poking into pithwood. The logic being that the Epilame is removed at the intended contact point (to avoid any residue that may mix with the oil), but remains in the areas where oil is not supposed to spread to (further down the pivot towards the wheel). The escape wheel teeth also benefit from having Epilame to keep the 9415 in place.  2. I use a syringe to treat only the pallet stones. I suspend the pallet fork with some Rodico so that the stones hang downwards. I notably use a rather thick needle where a drop WON'T form, but rather where the Epilame liquid stays in the needle tip, which I then dip into the pallet stones. It requires some practice to get the right amount of Epilame into the needle tip, but it works for me now. This way, no drop will "jump" onto the pallet fork and potentially go all the way to the pivots.  3. I let the movement run for a few minutes without lubricating the pallet stones... to scrape off the Epilame in the intended contact "channel". Then I remove the balance again and lubricate the exit pallet stone with 3-4 successive drops. See the "channel" that forms on the pallet stone in the picture -- not so easy to see, but it's visible.       I am conflicted about the use of Epliame in balance jewel settings. My impression is that the two jewels sufficiently suspend the oil (even 9010). Apparently Rolex recommends NOT to use Epliame there (heard from a former Rolex service center watchmaker), as it could cause additional wear. Apart from that, I follow specific instructions where I can find them. E.g. the infamous Rolex reverser wheels or sometimes (parts of) the seconds wheel. Exception: I'm currently servicing an Eta 2824 and will probably ignore the service sheet that recommends treating the whole keyless works with Epilame and then using HP1300... I'll skip the Epilame and use 9504 grease.        
    • I'm going to give this a try today/tomorrow on my UTC33/Seiko 66, thanks!
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • Don't forget Mark is a hard working watch maker so he is also tied up with work. I'm sure he is keeping his eye on this forum making sure it is running along nicely. 
×
×
  • Create New...