Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I have tried to polish the scratches out of my pocketwatch plastic crystal, but it has instead gone really sticky and cloudy. Its like it melted the top layer of plastic. Maybe this happened because the plastic is yellowed and old? The sticky residue is a bit like the glue left behind when removing a sticker.

Steve

20230514_191213.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, stevemilw said:

Hi,

I have tried to polish the scratches out of my pocketwatch plastic crystal, but it has instead gone really sticky and cloudy. Its like it melted the top layer of plastic. Maybe this happened because the plastic is yellowed and old? The sticky residue is a bit like the glue left behind when removing a sticker.

Steve

20230514_191213.jpg

What did you use to polish it Steve

21 minutes ago, stevemilw said:

Hi,

I have tried to polish the scratches out of my pocketwatch plastic crystal, but it has instead gone really sticky and cloudy. Its like it melted the top layer of plastic. Maybe this happened because the plastic is yellowed and old? The sticky residue is a bit like the glue left behind when removing a sticker.

Steve

20230514_191213.jpg

Before acrylic crystals, cellulose was used. Aged cellulose is likely to be more reactive than acrylic. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

IPA reacts with acrylic

It's quite possible that the problem is that your crystal isn't acrylic at all, but rather celluloid.

Celluloid was the early "unbreakable" alternative to glass for watch crystals long before we had acrylic and one of the problems that you get with celluloid is that it discolours with age, typically yellowing. You can't polish it out either as it is all the way through.

I suspect that there is something in the Polywatch that dissolves celluloid, it ought to be absolutely fine with acrylic since that is specifically what it is made for polishing.

One of the other undesirable qualities of celluloid is that it degasses, the products of which can accelerate rusting of steel.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Marc said:

It's quite possible that the problem is that your crystal isn't acrylic at all, but rather celluloid.

I've got to concur with @MarcIt is more than likely a cellulose compound the crystal is made from. If it had a yellow sheen to it and had some serious age to it, then it's very probable.  There is nothing you can do to resurrect this one, I'm afraid. Always best to replace one, as you can't even see through some of the really bad ones , unless it isn't too bad then you might want to keep the originality of the timepiece. Some will have their views on patina of dials and hands, etc. Personally, I like to see some history that has been etched into the watch case; not necessarily the acrylic though. I do like to give an original acrylic a polish to remove the major scratches by starting off with some 1200 grit wet and dry, or powder charged on a cotton bud, then go through various grit counts to end up using something like cerium oxide as a finish. I find original acrylic crystals, say from the 60's or 70's have a nicer smoother rounder profile than the modern day ones which are a bit blocky in my opinion.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the more "interesting" properties of some older clear plastic objects (and this includes old film stock, and some old watch crystals) is that they are made from nitrocellulose.
Of course this makes them interesting in a similar way to the way that radium dials are interesting. They have a certain level of mild peril associated with them.

Nitrocellulose is the main component of old fashioned "gun cotton" explosive.

Nitrocellulose film stock for this reason is notorious for spontaneous combustion, and furthermore for being almost impossible to extinguish, since it contains its own oxidizer. The reason more recent types of film stock are called 'safety film' is because they don't have this rather inconvenient property.

With this in mind, and if you are up for a small and mildly hazardous experiment, you might want to replace the yellowed crystal with a modern alternative, and then try burning the old one. If it burns rapidly and rather alarmingly, then it is made from nitrocellulose. If it melts and burns rather poorly, then it is a more modern acetate based crystal.

The usual caveats apply, you obviously do this entirely at your own risk. Don't forget to film the results. Burning down your entire neighbourhood may well net you a viral video. You can thank me afterwards. 😋 

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 2
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Below is a link discussing in great details the issues with polywatch and older cellulose crystals together with several methods to clean them and other types of crystal. Unfortunately I think it is too late for your crystal, but at least you will know for next time 🙂

 

 

As an aside I use Autosol acrylic paste, which I have found to work just as well as polywatch (I think its pretty much the same stuff - just in a bigger cheaper tube):

 

Acrylic_Polish__07093-2.jpg

Edited by Waggy
typo
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 5/14/2023 at 8:20 PM, Jon said:

I've got to concur with @MarcIt is more than likely a cellulose compound the crystal is made from. If it had a yellow sheen to it and had some serious age to it, then it's very probable.  There is nothing you can do to resurrect this one, I'm afraid. Always best to replace one, as you can't even see through some of the really bad ones , unless it isn't too bad then you might want to keep the originality of the timepiece. Some will have their views on patina of dials and hands, etc. Personally, I like to see some history that has been etched into the watch case; not necessarily the acrylic though. I do like to give an original acrylic a polish to remove the major scratches by starting off with some 1200 grit wet and dry, or powder charged on a cotton bud, then go through various grit counts to end up using something like cerium oxide as a finish. I find original acrylic crystals, say from the 60's or 70's have a nicer smoother rounder profile than the modern day ones which are a bit blocky in my opinion.

This is probably why then, thanks for clarifying. It felt like acrylic so i just assumed it was. 
I used Polywatch to polish it.  I'll get a replacement acrylic. 

On 5/14/2023 at 11:14 PM, AndyHull said:

One of the more "interesting" properties of some older clear plastic objects (and this includes old film stock, and some old watch crystals) is that they are made from nitrocellulose.
Of course this makes them interesting in a similar way to the way that radium dials are interesting. They have a certain level of mild peril associated with them.

Nitrocellulose is the main component of old fashioned "gun cotton" explosive.

Nitrocellulose film stock for this reason is notorious for spontaneous combustion, and furthermore for being almost impossible to extinguish, since it contains its own oxidizer. The reason more recent types of film stock are called 'safety film' is because they don't have this rather inconvenient property.

With this in mind, and if you are up for a small and mildly hazardous experiment, you might want to replace the yellowed crystal with a modern alternative, and then try burning the old one. If it burns rapidly and rather alarmingly, then it is made from nitrocellulose. If it melts and burns rather poorly, then it is a more modern acetate based crystal.

The usual caveats apply, you obviously do this entirely at your own risk. Don't forget to film the results. Burning down your entire neighbourhood may well net you a viral video. You can thank me afterwards. 😋 

Haha, very interesting. I might just try with a lighter and see what happens 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, stevemilw said:

I might just try with a lighter and see what happens

You'll need to post the photos/video or it didn't happen! 😋

On the subject of polishing cellulose crystals, I have used T-Cut car polish with reasonable success. It wont however remove yellowing from such crystals, as this is not just a surface phenomenon. Not all crystals can be saved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you so much, Hector and CJ. I appreciate the tech sheet and the video. Gasp, I think I will make the attempt. What's the worst that can happen? I think there may be a new balance complete in my future, though.  I'll update the post and let you know the result. R, Frank  
    • So here is the new base (v 2.1), I made it so that the base will fit over and swallow the stump of the hand pusher tool (or at least my clone of the tool), I also reduced the OD of the bottom skirt a little as it looked/felt a little large, here are a few pictures and the fake .pdf file which you need to convert to .zip once downloaded.   The cut-out seen on the below image on the bottom of the base should swallow the OD (40 mm, +0.1 mm tolerance) of the stump and the height of the stump 9.5mm (measured to 9.1mm, but rounded to 9.5mm) - let me know if this works for your tool.   Note, I think you may need to print supports for the new internal shelf created? Here is the fake .pdf for just the FreeCAD base file and 3mf files Modular Movement Holder.pdf Here is the fake pdf for complete set of the new base and ring FreeCAD/3mf files: Modular Movement Holder base and ring v 2.1.pdf However, I'm wondering how often you could use this feature, adding the dial usually increases the OD of the movement, so you would need a new (larger) adapter ring tuned to the OD of the dial and I wouldn't like to grip the dial in any kind of movement holder if It could be avoided for fear of damaging it. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?
    • Hi Frank, you have dived headlong into the deep end. Hairspring work has to be the scariest thing a newbie has to tackle. Your hairspring appears to be bent and just putting it back into the regulator would not allow the balance to work properly. It might start oscillating but the performance would not be good. The proper thing to do is to unstud the hairspring, remove the hairspring from the balance, reinstall the hairspring on the stud carrier, reshape the endcurve and centre the collet to the balance jewel hole. This challenge would either make you or break you. Hope that you will be able to fix your watch. Welcome to the world of watchmaking.  Watch this video. It think it'll give you an idea of the task ahead. From your 1st photo, I think you have a etachron type stud. Let me see if I can find a video on how to remove it from the arm.
    • Have read of the Tech Sheet attached on the balance section page 12. It may be bent but until you reposition it back in the regulator pins you'll never know. Cheers CJ 4R35B_4R36A.pdf
    • Aloha All, My Seiko 4R35B movement stopped working today. Upon closer inspection, it looks like the balance spring came out of the regulator pin. This is my first time working on a balance. Any advice on how to get this spring repositioned (back to normal)? I'm pretty sure that while adjusting the beat error on this movement, I must have turned the stud (I didn't even know they turned), and the spring eventually fell out.  Will the spring go back to even spacing when it's back in the pin, or does it look bent? Thanks, Frank  
×
×
  • Create New...