Jump to content

Smiths Platform Refurbishment - part 1, Balance Staff


Recommended Posts

Thanks to the support of this forum and my local BHI branch what started out as a hobby has become my second love (after my wife in case she is reading lol). So I've decided to make a second career of horology and signed up for the BHI DLC last July. Due to circumstances I'm following the clock path way though I still enjoy watched greatly. This may I'm completing the BHI technical grade exams plus, some of the next level modules. 

I've really enjoyed the making aspect but one thing I've put off has been making balance staffs. For some reason I found it intimidating.

As a starting point I've acquired a broken ABEC platform. It appears to have had a knock or shock. One balance pivot has snapped off and one pallet jewel is displaced. The upper pallet fork oil hole is damaged as well. It's also very scratched and corroded. 

I started with the staff. I thought the approach on the SLBHI youtube video looked straightforward so I followed that method. The staff is a simple shape, no waists on the pivots.  

A good opportunity to put my home made balance table to use for support whilst removing the hairspring.

DSC_2098a.thumb.jpg.4b7f234a1751e0108aa2eda1cca2ced6.jpg

Using 2mm pivot steel and initially using a 2.5mm carbide graver, I turned the post matching the length of each section by eye against the original, using a vernier caliper to check the diameters/taper followed by hand fitting to the wheel, collet and roller table once close. I turned the wheel side first and most of the roller table side but my graver was too large to finish it without turning the piece around. so I turned it and centred in the collet against my thumbnail. I left the pivots at 0.3mm as I intended to fit the wheel and complete them in the Jacot tool. Here is is, partly finished.

DSC_2100a.thumb.jpg.696073edb00e4d02a870ecab78789d5c.jpg

 

Using the Jacot tool I filed the pivots down to 0.11 mm then burnished them to 0.10 and polished the ends

DSC_2104a.thumb.jpg.70c5b1085c334b6b6a243f81cb79ebec.jpg

 

 A test fitting revealed that the fit was generally good but the roller table was fractionally too low and the seat for the wheel needed cutting square so that it would fit flush. What I found particularly difficult was creating a perfectly square shoulder for the roller and wheel to sit against, as the carbide graver has a slight radius at the end. You can see that the wheel is not perfectly flush with the shoulder and the slight radius on the shoulder for the balance table: DSC_2107.JPG

I switched to a 2mm lozenge shaped graver as the tip is finer so I could eliminate most of the radius in the shoulder, and used a ruby burnisher to remove the machining marks:

DSC_2116.thumb.JPG.f06bd66625ac5767a965b025060bf751.JPG

DSC_2112b.jpg

Adjustment made it fits well and runs freely. I always ask myself not only is this good enough, but also how could it be better. Whilst it is functionally fine, I think the finish could be better. It lacks crispness. I'm still pleased to have succeeded in making something that at least works. I'd love some feedback on how to do this better.

 Everything is sitting at the correct height:

DSC_2114.thumb.JPG.9f3246bbf886e2c94d1351554ca13225.JPG

I also broached out the damaged pivot hole for the pallet fork, and fitted a brass chaton and jewel. I thought the brass chaton looked wrong against the nickel plated bridge, and the bridge was terribly scratched and corroded, so I grained it and re-plated it. Please ignore the blue screws: I will bring the finish back to match the originals. I regret graining the bridge as I will not be able to get the plate to match it without pressing out the posts on which the cock and bridge are mounted.

DSC_2118.thumb.JPG.89c40832b27669ffc3e3d783460842fa.JPG

 

Next task is to fix the displaced exit pallet jewel. I've done this before and it seemed straightforward. I'm not sure how to deal with the corrosion on the escapement wheel. I could make a plate with a tiny hole in it and rotate the top face of the wheel against some lapping film perhaps?

 

DSC_2100a.jpg

Edited by Boz
Typing errors
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
    • Once a movement has the dial and hands put back and it is recased, would you expect the assembled watch to have the same amplitude as when the movement is in a movement holder and is without hands and dial? Thanks
    • C07641+ not sure what the "+" is for after the last digit.
×
×
  • Create New...