Jump to content

Unitas 431 Ratchet Wheel Screw - LH threaded?


Recommended Posts

Hi, I just managed to break the head off a ratchet wheel screw (not the crown wheel screw which is LH threaded) on a Unitas 431 in a Waltham 25 jewel railroad watch. I assumed it was RH threaded and was frozen (which it might well have been for all I know presently). I had previously successfully worked on a Unitas 6431/6445 variant and didn't have any problem with the ratchet wheel screw so I was a little too sure of myself with this one. 

I did source a new arbor for the 431 but I can't find a new loose screw. I don't have a screw machine (I might ask my jeweler to make one).  Does anyone have any experience with this movement? I'm under the naive impression that there can't be much difference between the barrel/arbor/ ratchet in Unitas family 431 cum 6431 cum 6445 cum 6497. Is this screw indeed LH threaded? Will a ratchet wheel screw from a 6497 fit a 431 arbor? I'm waiting for delivery of the arbor before I can test it.

I assembled the movement and I was successful in restoring it with the exception of the arbor/screw. I was able to wind the watch to test it without the screw but obviously this is only temporary.

I did check Dr Ranfif's webpage and he cautions that the 431 might have a LH thread, but he also says this about the 6431/6445 which I didn't experience.

If anyone has any information I would appreciate it. I'll publish my findings in the hope it might help someone else...J.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Watchoutnow said:

a ratchet wheel screw

I have a link to a parts listing where we have a mystery. So they list the ratchet wheel screw not sure if we can get one but which one did you want to left-handed or the right-handed one? This is one of the problems of watches that have been made over time you can end up with variations. Like I see this for different balance completes for this watch that's always a clue of made over time with variations.

then when you figure out which screw you need you click on it and give your cross referenced all the ones that have the same screw type. You can also take the suitable part number and go to their home page enter it in and see if they have one

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=UT_431

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&Unitas_431

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, I see the link in Jules Borel but can't seem to be able to order either part. I have an arbor coming but I don't know if it is a RH or LH. What baffles me is that the mainspring is a RH winder, which means that turning the ratchet screw to the left would put resistance against the click pawl which would allow me to unscrew it. If I turned it to the right it would only wind the watch, so how could it be a LH screw? Would I have to have been holding the winding stem crown to put resistance in the RH direction? This seems strange. ..J.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also see in JB's index that the UT 431 RH screw 5415/607 cross-references to the ratchet wheel screw on a UT 6497 which are easily had. So, maybe I'll get lucky and receive a RH arbor that matches a 6497 ratchet screw. I also searched this pn on Otto Frei's parts look up and it too references the UT 6497. Maybe the arbor for a 6497 might also be compatible, something else I could try. 

Otherwise I'll need to find a 5415/375LH screw, or have a screw made or have the arbor I have with the broken screw machined out and re tapped to fit an available screw...J.

Edited by Watchoutnow
wrong lh screw pn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Watchoutnow said:

have a screw made or have the arbor

you must live in a different part of the planets and I do because getting a custom screw made would cost more than the whole watch. I don't even know actually who would make custom screws. Typically when I need a screw I open up my box of miscellaneous screws and go through all the little containers so I find something that works. Or I have physical material houses I could send the watch down and see what they have or see if they would even have the part this is one of the minor catches to online material houses they don't actually list everything. So if you had the luxury of living in a location that had a physical material house you could ask them or even some of the online ones you can ask if they have the part

6 hours ago, Watchoutnow said:

Maybe the arbor for a 6497 might also be compatible, something else I could try.

if you click on the arbor for your watch at the link I gave you it gives you the cross references and the 6497 is not a cross reference part. So while the screw might fit the arbor will notplus of course the barrel does not fit either.

Then a course is back to eBay to see if can find a broken movement. Then this is also the probably working on older watches is defined spare parts. Or for that matter find you spare parts for just about any watch can be a challenge depends upon what it is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I resolved my problem. I was able to back out the broken screw in the arbor and confirmed that it was indeed LH threaded. I found a LH screw for it in a box of mixed ratchet wheel screws. I also received the replacement arbor I ordered and found that it is indeed RH threaded. I found the matching screw for this in the same box of screws. I decided to install the RH arbor instead of the original LH arbor in order to spare some future watchmaker of the same frustration. I would think that since this movement was a mass produced item that the screw couldn't be that hard to find.

I even found a match for the missing dial feet screws in another box of mixed df screws. CK has nice mixed lots of assorted screws for various functions at a very reasonable price. 

I still wish I had a mini lathe and a set of screw dies. I'm a retired engineer and it was too easy to ask someone at work to make something every time it was need...so that's the "parts of the planets" I'm from.

I didn't try a ratchet wheel screw from a 6497 to test to see if that was compatible but I may if I get a loose one, I just didn't feel like opening up the 6497 I have cased. The arbor and barrel is much smaller but I did test the ratchet wheel and the square matches the arbor but the wheel diameter is also much smaller.

I hope this helps someone else someday...J.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Watchoutnow said:

I resolved my problem. I was able to back out the broken screw in the arbor and confirmed that it was indeed LH threaded. I found a LH screw for it in a box of mixed ratchet wheel screws. I also received the replacement arbor I ordered and found that it is indeed RH threaded. I found the matching screw for this in the same box of screws. I decided to install the RH arbor instead of the original LH arbor in order to spare some future watchmaker of the same frustration. I would think that since this movement was a mass produced item that the screw couldn't be that hard to find.

I even found a match for the missing dial feet screws in another box of mixed df screws. CK has nice mixed lots of assorted screws for various functions at a very reasonable price. 

I still wish I had a mini lathe and a set of screw dies. I'm a retired engineer and it was too easy to ask someone at work to make something every time it was need...so that's the "parts of the planets" I'm from.

I didn't try a ratchet wheel screw from a 6497 to test to see if that was compatible but I may if I get a loose one, I just didn't feel like opening up the 6497 I have cased. The arbor and barrel is much smaller but I did test the ratchet wheel and the square matches the arbor but the wheel diameter is also much smaller.

I hope this helps someone else someday...J.

Also a retired engineer...electrical. I love my lathes. Recently re-pivoted a center wheel. This morning I made a setting lever screw for a member of this forum.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

as we like to dream about making things here is a book that talks about making things. Making things by machinery unfortunately they don't break each machine down to its components which would be rather nice. I rather like page 48 the steps of making a balance staff by machinery.

https://archive.org/details/evolutionofautom00mars

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've seen some really nice early 20th century pieces where all the jewels, including center wheel, were convex. Definitely to reduce friction. It can be quite hard to tell if a jewel has olive holes, especially on small sizes, but that again reduces friction- as well as accommodates small misalignments better. Why they aren't used more often? I imagine it was found that at a certain point in the train the actual advantage became negligible, and the added cost on high production movements is why it's not seen on those, just higher-end pieces.   I did an experiment on a little 5x7"' AS 1012 a few years back. These things run OK sometimes, but often are absolute dogs. And AS made gajillions of them. I had a NOS novelty watch in for a service, ran OK flat, massive drop in amplitude vertical. Made like 3 staffs for it trying different pivot sizes, no change. Tried high quality (not Seitz) convex/olive jewels, no change- the original were flat, but could have been olive hole. Same for the pallet fork, then escape wheel, no change. Probably had 20 hours in the watch, new staff and new hole jewels through the escape wheel, no difference in running. Just a dog of a movement. But if I were making a watch I would use them, just because.
    • When Nicklesilver mentioned the use of them on non coned pivots on older high end watches closer to the escapement.  That suggested to me  probably fourth wheels and possibly third wheels. The square shoulder rotatating on the much smaller surface area of a dome as opposed to a flat jewel surface. I'm curious as to why they are not used predominantly?
    • That's what I thought, but as I said, it makes sense. See if any of our pros will have something to add.
    • Kind of guessing here watchie with a bit of logic.
    • Canon with FE 4612a movement. Day and Date display Trying something new. Although is will take some time for me to start, I have a back injury that is very painful and so cannot concentrate. Set myself a target to begin mid May. Purchased a Canon wrist watch with  FE 4612a movement. Advertised with Rotor missing. Arrived, took photographs. Strap broken, removed and place in bin. Back removed. No rotor. Wind is stiff. Can wind up. Everything moves ok. Oscillates for under a minute, then stops. No rotor but all wheels appear the be there. Have sent for a donor movement FE4612. No day wheel.  I have taken basic photographs up to the point of service commencement. I will try a new format and use the record system on the microscope to show the full disassembly subsequent assembly. I will photograph the cleaning process.  Whilst I have no intention beginning a YouTube channel, I would like to begin to make a better record of my work standard. Work to do.  Make case to a better standard. Repair crystal. Replace strap.  Only a thought. I will try to insert an English day wheel. Not sure if it can be done, but hey, what can I lose. Got to stop now, back so sore.
×
×
  • Create New...