Jump to content

Watch becomes overbanked when in the dial up position. Runs perfectly otherwise


Recommended Posts

I have a watch that will run for hours with no problem when in the dial-down position, but when put in the dial-up position, will run for about 30 seconds before becoming overbanked.  It's not always overbanked, sometimes a gentle tap will get the balance moving again.  But other times it's totally locked up and requires removal of the balance to fix.

I had replaced the mainspring with a white alloy.  My first assumption was that the amplitude was too high, but a slow mo video showed that amplitude is only about 180 degrees.  The endshake of the balance is a bit high.  I can hear the distinct galloping sound when it's dial-up.

Unfortunately, it was tough to get a good shot of the pallet/balance when it was locked up.  What other photos could help diagnose the issue?

 

IMG_20230226_115453.jpg

IMG_20230226_182811.jpg

IMG_20230226_182850.jpg

Edited by GregG
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think anything is wrong with the pallet jewels, other than the shellac looks strangely old and crusty.

But with regards to your roller table idea.  Is it because when it's upside down, the impulse pin might fall out of contact with the forked end of the pallet and guard pin, so the balance can spin to the opposite side without the pallet fork having bene engaged as well?  Then on the swing back, if it does contact the forked end, they're on the wrong side, so it stops dead in its tracks?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

A picture of the other side of the pallet. 

Richard are you suspecting bent pivot on the fork? 

Frankly, pallets look a bit misaligned too, repivotted, has had a hard life.

Edited by Nucejoe
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Couldn't open your vid.

Petersas makes sense, check all shakes in the escapement and pallets, ....  lock ...etc.

Is it adjustable banks? 

High magnification is a must have in watch repair.

Good luck

.

 

Don't think the banking is adjustable, but I will double check.  I will remove the third/escape wheels later today to get a clearer picture for everyone.

20 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Richard are you suspecting bent pivot on the fork? 

Frankly, pallets look a bit misaligned too, repivotted, has had a hard life.

I will take some pictures of the pallet fork.  Didn't seem misaligned to me when I had it off.  Could just be the angle of the photo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Yes, I've found that watches can run remarkably well in one position with broken pivots and not run at all in other positions. 

 

36 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Yes, I've found that watches can run remarkably well in one position with broken pivots and not run at all in other positions. 

Fork arbour looks shellaced in the hole , perhaps not a good friction fit,  so might not be perpendicular to the fork. 

but either case both us are likely to have located the fault. 

Rgds

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got some more pictures today.  I also got a video of the endshake on the pallet fork.  I forgot to take a video of endshake on the balance, but it seems very high (though the staff does not seem to be broken).  Not sure what to do about that since the jewels are rubbed in.  Also, in the first two pictures, I did my best to capture what the balance/pallet look like when it's stuck.  Interestingly, the jewel is on the opposite side of the pallet in those pictures.  The pallet fork is hung up on the roller.  Though without the escape wheel in the gear train, I think the pallet was free to swing to the opposite side under gravity get stuck.  Banking is fixed.

I purchased an inexpensive USB microscope that should be here tomorrow so hopefully I can take some better photos.

 

 

IMG_20230227_185122.jpg

IMG_20230227_185111.jpg

IMG_20230227_184338.jpg

IMG_20230227_184336.jpg

IMG_20230227_183606.jpg

IMG_20230227_182150.jpg

IMG_20230227_182149.jpg

IMG_20230227_182025.jpg

IMG_20230227_181947.jpg

IMG_20230227_181923.jpg

IMG_20230227_181803.jpg

IMG_20230227_181750.jpg

Edited by GregG
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GregG said:

 I forgot to take a video of endshake on the balance, but it seems very high (though the staff does not seem to be broken).  Not sure what to do about that since the jewels are rubbed in.  

You can reduce the endshake by adjusting the cock, place a piece of aluminum foil in between the cock and mainplate, placing the shim near the outer premeter of the mainplate tilts the cock lowering its setting, move the shim inward /outward to get the perfect endshake. Keep an eye on the roller table, fork and  impulse jewel to engage correctly. 

If and when the cause of the issue is found, it should be fixed accordingly.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Richard are you suspecting bent pivot on the fork? 

Frankly, pallets look a bit misaligned too, repivotted, has had a hard life.

Yes, I've found that watches can run remarkably well in one position with broken pivots and not run at all in other positions. 

Aren't pallet jewels usually bevelled on the ends? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/27/2023 at 7:32 PM, Petersas said:

Pallet jewel needs adjusting 

Or could be roller-table is to high .

Lets expand this a bit, the roller-table might be so high that impluse jewel passes over it, EVEN AFTER BALANCE END SHAKE IS MINIMIZED.  I would first adjust all  end shakes and see what else has the preveous watch destroyer has done.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, mikepilk said:

What does the pivot on the top of the balance staff look like ?

The top of the balance actually looks fine.  It's tough to see it between the coils of the hairspring, but the narrow point of the balance staff appears to be intact.

2 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Lets expand this a bit, the roller-table might be so high that impluse jewel passes over it, EVEN AFTER BALANCE END SHAKE IS MINIMIZED.  I would first adjust all  end shakes and see what else has the preveous watch destroyer has done.

I will try the aluminum foil method today and report my findings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Klassiker said:

Did you adjust the end-shake on the pallet fork as well?

No.  I didn't know how to do it for the pallet.  I understand for the balance that shimming up one side would push the other side down.  But either way it's been running no problems, so if it ain't broke, don't fix it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GregG said:

I didn't know how to do it for the pallet

You would do it according to the same principle used for the balance, i.e. a piece of foil under the pallet cock, behind the screw, to tilt the jeweled end down slightly. As Nucejoe explained, the shimming is how you make reversible adjustments for diagnostic purposes. The permanent fix will be different.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Klassiker said:

You would do it according to the same principle used for the balance, i.e. a piece of foil under the pallet cock, behind the screw, to tilt the jeweled end down slightly. As Nucejoe explained, the shimming is how you make reversible adjustments for diagnostic purposes. The permanent fix will be different.

In retrospect, when you say that, it was stupid of me to say I wasn't sure how to do it haha. 🙂 

I last left it running dial up last night.  But if I come home today and it's still running, I am going to call it good enough.  I will continue to monitor it for a few days.  If it runs in all positions, I don't want to start fussing with what now works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, GregG said:

 I am going to call it good enough.  I will continue to monitor it for a few days.  If it runs in all positions, I don't want to start fussing with what now works.

Good idea.

Good amplitude is the first concern now, in case its low, then  a close look at the lock on pallets is the next step. 

Rgds

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 hours and it's still running!

Also there are two inscriptions on it:

Souvenir of the World War, years 1914-1918

1917
Joachim Zone
Jodoigne-Souveraine
Brabant
Belgique
1917-1918

Joachim (male name) in the zone of Jodoigne-Souveraine, in the province of Brabant, in Belgium

I tried to contact the local government of Jodoigne to see if they have any records of a Joachim who would be of fighting age during WW1, but the govt website is down.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hold the crown when in winding position, move the click away from the crown wheel, and then while holding the crown let it slowly unwind. I recollect that you must remove the automatic device bridge first, but maybe I'm wrong. You can first try without removing the automatic device bridge.
    • nevenbekriev- You nailed it with your description of me and my reaction when the clock started ticking again. I am a newbie.  I love the sound and idea of mechanical clocks but the idea of owning one and trying to keep them running has never appealed to me. My wife bought this one and an antique German wall clock.  When I looked into having someone repair them for me, the universal response was "it's really expensive to work on them, you should just replace the movement". So, I had nothing to lose, I started researching them and opened them up. The wife is happy because she hears the sound of the clocks again. But I have gone down the "accuracy" rabbit hole. In the vertical position, the balance wheel was not floating. It was sitting on the bottom of the frame. I adjusted the lower spring collet and got it floating. It easily passed the 270 degree 3 to 5 minute oscillation test. It took 8 minutes for the wheel to completely stop moving.  I put it the unit back in the movement and checked the safety pin. It does not touch the safety roller anywhere in +/-270 degrees rotation from neutral position. But the amplitude of the rotation with the spring fully wound is weak based on what you are saying. It rotates +/-90 degrees from the neutral position.  No, I did not take the movement completely apart.  That seemed way outside my skill set at the time. There is a reason I became an electrical engineer and not a mechanical engineer. I am much more comfortable with moving electrons than tiny moving metal parts. Will I do it in the long run? Anything can happen. I don't seem to be able to let it go.
    • Isn't that the same guy who told Zelenskyy to escalate the war with Russia/Putin when they already had a peace deal? 2 years later and we have half a million young Ukranian boys dead. He doesn't seem very clever...
    • Thanks guys.  quick question. For automatic movement, particularly this one. can I power down the main spring by pushing this rachet down?  i've gotten pretty used to SW210 and powering down a manual movement. But so far i've only been waiting for the auto movement to run out of juice before opening the case.     
×
×
  • Create New...