Jump to content

How do I identify the thread size on a screw that I want to fabricate?


Recommended Posts

I have a watch with a set lever screw that has a very chewed up head, and it's difficult to get a screwdriver in there.  I'm considering fabricating a new one if I can't refurbish the head.

However, I have no idea how to tell what the thread pitch is.  If there are two dimensions to a screw (diameter and pitch), I'd need a testing jig that has every common combination of thread pitch and screw diameter, which as far as I'm aware doesn't exist.

I have one of those cheapo Indian tap and die sets (https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/0070mm-to-0200mm-indian), but that doesn't tell you thread pitch, only diameter.

Appreciate the help, thank you.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The screws used in Swiss watches (since the last 100 years or so?) are standardized, to NIHS norms. If you have a look at the Asco-Schurch catalog in the cutting tap section they show all the thread diameters and screw pitches (and tap drill sizes, really handy catalog). So if it's a Swiss watch, once you know the diameter, the pitch takes care of itself. I don't know about Japanese watches, and American stuff is all over the map. Antique stuff will often correspond to a Martin screwplate thread, which for the most part, in small sizes, tend to actually be quite close to the modern Swiss standard.

 

Asco-Schurch

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GregG said:

Thank you for the link, that is helpful to know.

What if the watch is not Swiss and/or is it over 100 years old?

You'd have to measure, would really need a profile projector or toolmaker's microscope for watch size screws. Then, you'd have to make the die, haha. For antique stuff I've always managed with a Martin screwplate (there's L and B plates, Latard and Bourgeaux, slightly different pitches and diameters, B seems closest to modern metric); there's also Marin G, for gauche or left hand. Then there's Thury which was also Swiss, 19th century, and was adapted in the British Association threads, with a nice thread angle of 47.5 degrees. The Germans had other threads (I have a Ludwig & Fries plate here), the French had theirs, for antique stuff it's a huge subject. A lot of really old threads have quite odd forms, rounded crests and almost straight flanks, odd flank angles like the Thury. I know a world class clock restorer who has over 500 different screw plates, all classified, and can replicate just about any screw for any clock with those.

 

Nowadays you could make about anything you want with a relatively cheap Sherline CNC lathe I suppose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
    • Once a movement has the dial and hands put back and it is recased, would you expect the assembled watch to have the same amplitude as when the movement is in a movement holder and is without hands and dial? Thanks
    • C07641+ not sure what the "+" is for after the last digit.
×
×
  • Create New...