Jump to content

Elgin M-56b US Patent


Recommended Posts

I just ran across this today.  For those of you who enjoy reading patents...have at it (I do it for a living).

The patent number was printed on an M-56b bottle, thus it may not apply to M-56.  We will probably never know the difference.

Elgin Watch Oil Patent US2355616.pdf

Edited by LittleWatchShop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, spectre6000 said:

For those of us that don't read patents for a living, what about this one in particular is especially interesting/should we be focused on?

Very detailed spec.  If you were a chemist (I am not), you could probably synthesize this with the detail of the spec.

Claim 9 gives a succinct description of the lubricant.

It is the oil I use BTW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I am convinced that 56-a is as good as 56-b.  I have a full bottle of 56-a and equivalent of about four bottles of 56-b (the blue one-drop bottles).  I will never run out of 56-b, but if I did, I would use 56-a. 

All this based on a precise scientific wild ass guess (PSWAG).

I put a drop of both on a glass several months ago and then set it on its side.  The drops appear identical then and now.  Yeah, there's a dozen other tests that should be performed to prove they are equivalent.

Finally, if 56-b had some special sauce, they would have protected it by filing a continuation of their patent.  No evidence that they did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/12/2023 at 9:14 AM, LittleWatchShop said:

If you were a chemist (I am not), you could probably synthesize this with the detail of the spec.

Claim 9 gives a succinct description of the lubricant.

maybe another approach to get the oil would be if I a company making horological lubrication made a request. Like a request of the watch community please send us your oil and we will analyze it and synthesize it. Then we will sell it under the name Elgin which will upset the holder of the Elgin name and supposedly that's why it's no longer available in this country. I'm attaching a picture of it and the PDF.

 

On 4/3/2023 at 8:26 AM, LittleWatchShop said:

56-a is as good as 56-b.

no idea who made the lubrication chart comparing oils but according to that there is a difference between the a and b.

 

Elgin M-56a oil.jpg

Elgin watch oil modern.JPG

elgin oil chart 55.jpg

Elgin M-56b oil.jpg

TS5500EN elgin oil.pdf

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like it may be possible to get the Dr. Tillwich oil, but my guess is that it would be eye-wateringly expensive.  Has anyone ever looked into current pricing? Cas-ker has the LGN grease, but it is $145 for a seven gram tube.  Ouch.

 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, dadistic said:

Has anyone ever looked into current pricing? Cas-ker

maybe you could email and ask if they have the oil as they did have it at one time. Don't remember what they listed for price the

3 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Fortunately for me, I have a lifetime supply of 56b!

amusingly the last time I saw it for sale on eBay the seller had make an offer and a starting price of $9.99. Typically with make an offer you would offer less but I offered $20 which was rejected and then one week later I bid and got it for $9.99 because nobody bid against me. So based on the rate that I use oil yes it looks like I have a lifetime supply also. But I haven't even got around to testing it yet I wanted tested in some watches and see how well it performs.

So yes it does show up on eBay from time to time it's just a shame that it wasn't readily available at a reasonable price because it definitely looks so much more promising than Swiss oil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sorry about obsessing over this Elgin lube...lol...just comes up now and then here and other fora.

Has anyone ever seen a bottle of Elgin oil labeled just "M-56" with no "a" or "b?"

Puzzling.    Integrated circuits always have a rev letter "A" for the first mask set.  That is because we know (in spite of our best efforts) there will be a "fix."  Not so common in product labeling though.

So then...why is there an M-56a?  They would have only labeled it that way if there were also an M-56b, n’est-ce Pas?  Maybe...just maybe, as the data @JohnR725has shared (that the performance of M-56a is different than b) they sold both versions concurrently. 

We, on this forum, are just too young to have experienced the history--I think.  Although, sometimes @JohnR725comments make me think he was born around 1901 or thereabouts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Has anyone ever seen a bottle of Elgin oil labeled just "M-56" with no "a" or "b?"

probably the easiest way to figure this out would be to do a search of horological publications in the 50s and see if there's any Elgin oil before version a came into existence.

thinking of the literature I don't have time to look but Elgin usually put publication dates on their literature did we ever figure out from publication dates if we looked whether there was a time difference between A&B coming out?

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks as if they started out calling it 56-A right from the start in 1940. That's the trademark that was filed, and that's how it was named in the announcement in their service bulletin.   There is a possibility that their chemists were already tinkering with another product formula (56-B) with slightly different characteristics that they knew they'd want to eventually sell but they wanted to get this one on the market first. (That would be similar to the way things often work in pharmaceutical development...) Hope this link works:

https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/guide/company/elgin/catalogs/elgin-watch-co-service-bulletin-c.1940/15

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, diveboy said:

Elgin watch oil timeline

1941 m56a

1944 N22a developed for the Navy for low temp operation

1948 m56b

1954 "frigid all weather" oil for the military rated for 75f below freezing 

 

This comports with the US military repair manual from 1945...as shown in these images.

Where did you dig up this historical information?  Well done--competing with @JohnR725for watchgoogle.

2023-04-19 08_40_58-TM 9-1575.pdf _ - Foxit PhantomPDF.png

2023-04-19 08_41_24-TM 9-1575.pdf _ - Foxit PhantomPDF.png

2023-04-19 08_43_23-TM 9-1575.pdf _ - Foxit PhantomPDF.png

12 hours ago, Geotex said:

Hope this link works

Yes it works!

My Dad completed watchmaking school in 1947.  He had two bottles of 56a in his watchbench I inherited.  If he bought it new, they were selling it in that time period.  I have six bottles of the blue Elgin oil which does not say 56-b, but it most certainly is.  One of the 56a bottles is empty and the other is 3/4 full.  The blue bottles are mostly full except for one as I recall.  All this seems to mean both oils were available concurrently...at least for a time (as I mentioned above).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I probably should've waited much longer to post the second reply because it decided to merge everything together which requires me to re-edits and explain what all the images are which behind it becomes a big mess then.

We have the Elgin watchword publication this is the publication of the Elgin watch company for the employees. We can see the article on the new cold temperature oil. then easy to recognize because the ill-fated pages the American horologist magazine 1942 snipped out some images from that including non-Elgin oil.

Then for two more watchword magazines 1948 when they introduce the m56b oil in 1955 for the talk about the history and more about oil.

then from the horological times a little section on oil and the history in reference to other companies making lubrication.

Elgin watch word 1954 page 2.JPG

Elgin oil page 3 not.JPG

Elgin oil page 2.JPG

Elgin oil page 1.JPG

Elgin oil magazine title.JPG

Elgin oil horological times February 2000.JPG

Elgin watch word 1954 page 1.jpg

found two interesting articles in the Elgin watchword magazine. 1948 introduction of the m56b oil and another article from 1955 that is also interesting.

Elgin oil watch word 1955 page 1.JPG

Elgin oil watchword 1955 page 2.JPG

Elgin oil watchword 1955 page 3.JPG

Elgin oil watchword 1948 page 1.jpg

Elgin oil watchword 1948 page 2.jpg

Elgin oil watchword 1948 page 3.jpg

Elgin oil watchword 1948 page 4.jpg

Edited by JohnR725
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

One of those clips was pretty "matter of fact" about Elgin oil.  I have been looking for a catalog that sold these oils side by side.

you're seeing a classic problem with horological literature of it spans a great deal of time. It doesn't seem to get revisions that often so what appears to be current may not be. So I think because of that we tend to see overlapping of things that maybe don't overlap as much as we think perhaps.

the dating of things gets to be interesting if you read the fine print of both the watchword in the 48 and 55 you get amusing things. So apparently 1940 is when the m56a was announced the world I'm assuming it was late in 1940 then one of the article says that two years later they developed the m56b version. But then in one of their other articles and says 1943 which would correspond the 1941. But then we don't see that oil coming out until 1948. I suppose I read all the fine print of the article on to grasp why probably something like a world war interfered with producing their oil.

then the history on the page the horological times as interesting because Elgin comes out with both of their synthetic oils before the Swiss to buy a couple of years. This would of course explain why we see it referenced literally everywhere and even Elgin talks about supplying I think half the oil to the United States and sending a lot of little to Switzerland because their oil beat out everything in existence at the time and some of us still think it beats out the oil that's in existence. But then the pesky Swiss had to get involved. Somewhere has seen a reference where if you look at the older Rolex technical documentation they were using the Hamilton oils but because her a Swiss product they have become up with their own lubrication they couldn't be using American stuff in their watches.

So I have a suspicion is you will not see both Elgin oils for sale at the same time unless someone's clearing out old stock. These everything says the m56b is the better version I guess think were seeing overlapping of documentation. Although it's conceivable that material houses still had supplies of existing oils.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I installed the donor pallet fork and now the watch is running, but only for 10 seconds. The lower side of the pallet fork only seems to go into the hole when I add the bridge. A visual check shows lower and upper are properly seated. I'll check the hairspring.
    • I get that, but you're making unnecessary work for yourself. Resign yourself to having to give the movement a final clean and lubrication once you've fixed the problem. You probably won't need to redo the balance or the barrel in any case. The oil captured between the hole and cap jewels will still be good even if you've had it in and out of the movement half a dozen times.
    • Thanks, some great advice. I have to go over the train every time I refit anything as each wheel has it's own bridge (cock?). They have a tiny amount of play so you can tighten them down in slightly different positions. This changes the gear mesh. I went through all that when I first started having issues with it. Movement works isn't fitted at the moment and nor is the seconds hand. The only reason I'm cleaning it every time is because each time I assemble it, I lubricate it. Mainly because you have to remove the balance wheel and hairspring to oil the top balance jewel. It's a pain so I always live in hope it will be going together for the last time. As the top one has to be oiled, so does the bottom one. Then I may as well do the train wheels.... I could just do the whole thing dry, but if it works, I'll still have to disassemble the balance again and it's always a risk. The hair spring is pinned, the cap jewel screws are underneath (stupid design. To be fair, the 3 separate bridges is a stupid design too).   I'll play with it more tomorrow and gather some more info, pics, and maybe some video.   Thanks for all the advice.
    • It's not great, IF you did the test without the pallet installed. Assuming 18000 beats per day, 25 seconds is 125 beats or about 62 oscillations. You should get 100 or more. If the pallet was in place when you did the test it means nothing. Either way, this is not the principal issue. I was going to mention that I recently worked out that I get much better pics with a loupe held in front of the phone camera than trying to shoot down the microscope. I use a 20x loupe, but try with whatever you have. The roller jewel (or impulse jewel) could be an issue, particularly if it is loose, but this is also not the main issue. Get some clear pics so you can ask the experienced members here about it after you have addressed the main issue. Nothing in the escapement explains the rapid deterioration you're seeing 20 minutes after winding. That suggests an issue in the train rather than the escapement. The failure to self-start after it has been running a while confirms that power is not getting to the escapement. If it was me, and I was confident I had eliminated the barrel as the source of the problem, I'd be looking further down the train. I'd first make sure the canon pinion was out to eliminate the motion works as a source of the problem. Also make sure the centre seconds pivot is removed, if it has one, or the seconds hand if it has sub-seconds. If that didn't make a difference I'd then work my way through each wheel starting at the centre wheel. Is it sitting level? At the right height? Does it have just enough end shake? Does it have excessive side shake? What happens if you touch the upper pivot with a piece of pegwood with just a little bit of power in the mainspring? What about the lower pivot? Once I was certain there was no problem there I'd move on to the third wheel, and so on all the way down the train. Just because the train runs freely with the pallet out does not mean it has no problems as excessive side shake (for example) will only be an issue when the train is under tension. Finally, I advise you to stop re-cleaning until you have fixed it. I know the temptation, but it's just a distraction. You need to be systematic and methodical.
    • If you short the two blue wires together, does the unit chime? I have a similar chime unit that is designed to work with a quartz movement with an hourly trigger switch.  I'm not aware of any movements or chiming units that chime quarterly.
×
×
  • Create New...