Jump to content

Mainspring winder and braking grease advice from Aliexpress for Omega 550 series barrels?


Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

Due to political reasons I can only buy stuff from Aliexpress, other things are held at customs for me

I wonder if these will work for Omega 550 series barrels: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005004895035484.html 

I also couldn't find any leads on a braking grease to use, I'd appreciate if a more knowledgeable member can run some keywords and find one on Aliexpress that will work on assumably brass barrels

This will be my first experience with barrels, previously I either ignored or replaced them (hobbyist)

Regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

I am an amateur, but here is what I would suggest.

I'm not sure how much breaking this is going to have it looks more like a high-pressure grease which means it might just slip continuously?

10 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

Then recently I discovered this on AliExpress
https://a.aliexpress.com/_m0Mupse

I wonder if it can be used as a braking grease.

At least it implies breaking properties.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

I'm not sure how much breaking this is going to have it looks more like a high-pressure grease which means it might just slip continuously?

From Esslinger website:

This special purpose Moebius grease contains Molybdenum disulphide to enhance it lubricity and resistance to pressure. It is designed for use on automatic mainsprings, to ensure proper functioning of the bridle. It is also recommended for use on the Bulova Accutron watch movements. 

Moebius 8201 natural watch grease lubricant
Contains Molybdenum disulphide

--------

I use this. 

image.png.f363dd596f59ae453d186ba14051517f.png

 

Edited by LittleWatchShop
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am still not sure if „breaking“ ist the purpose of a breaking grease. It should just prolong the life of the highly loaded inner wall of the barrel which serves as a kind of breaking drum imho. That’s why MoS2 is used.

Unfortunately I haven‘t found tests which compare power reserves of differently lubed barrels. Any ideas here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Kalanag said:

I am still not sure if „breaking“ ist the purpose of a breaking grease. It should just prolong the life of the highly loaded inner wall of the barrel which serves as a kind of breaking drum imho. That’s why MoS2 is used.

Unfortunately I haven‘t found tests which compare power reserves of differently lubed barrels. Any ideas here?

Makes a lot of sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Moebius 8201 natural watch grease lubricant
Contains Molybdenum disulphide

I like your brilliant detective work except it conflicts with my memory at school so perhaps you could help me out

Here's the problem I had at school in the early days the lubrication's didn't have numbers I'm not even sure they had their name on the Bottles, grabbed the bottle looked right I'm sure it was the 8201 so you would be proud and it slips. So far sounds fine except if you look at the link below this is basically 8200 which is a general-purpose lubrication for mainsprings where you want them to slip all the time with zero breaking effect with the bonus of the high-pressure Molybdenum disulphide. In other words you have a really really nice lubrication with zero breaking effect which is what I remembered wind it up it slips and it slips until is no power So basically I found it sucks for mainspring breaking grease as it has zero breaking effect. In other words I found it does exactly what it specified as a really nice high-pressure lubricant with zero breaking effect.

If you look at the link below they do tell you which ones are supposed to be the breaking grease 8012, 8013 and 8017 They even specifically use the word breaking.

3 hours ago, Kalanag said:

I am still not sure if „breaking“ ist the purpose of a breaking grease. It should just prolong the life of the highly loaded inner wall of the barrel which serves as a kind of breaking drum imho. That’s why MoS2 is used.

Unfortunately I haven‘t found tests which compare power reserves of differently lubed barrels. Any ideas here?

Breaking is the purpose of breaking grease. It's supposed to hold the mainspring in place and not allow the mainspring to slip effortlessly which it will do if you use the wrong lubrication. Then the purpose of the grease is also to keep your barrel wall from disintegrating. So it serves two purposes it's a lubrication only when enough pressure has been applied to break free. Then just to make things confusing all lubrication's have a breaking property just some of them it's much better for this application.

Then if you wanted to run tests occasionally will see a reference to this in the tech sheets and that is you wind up your watch until the mainspring slips counting how many turns it took to reach that point and then you see how much slippage you have. So view using a really nice lubricant that with zero breaking a fact you probably won't even build a reach the end of the spring before it slips and when it does slip it's going to unwind a heck of a lot and if you use something really sticky. I get a better effect but if you use something like p125 which to me resembles tar and if the person who asked he advises you incorrectly like what's happened the may then it has extreme breaking properties with almost no lubrication effect at all. I was doing a Seiko at work which I almost never do ask the idiot head watchmaker and he said put all around the barrel which is not what people recommend it's supposed to be a little spots on a couple of places on the barrel and when I wound it up to the end I thought as you break the screw head off the ratchet wheel it was so tight so we have kind of a balance here you have to have slipping or you could break your automatic or you will screw up timekeeping if you don't have any breaking at all but ideally the watch should bill a run a few hours after it slips. So an interesting compromise we have.

 

https://www.moebius-lubricants.ch/en/products/greases

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I understand it the breaking grease has two jobs to do, one of which is to provide lubrication between the bridle and barrel wall as the bridle slips, the other is provide the right amount of stickiness or grip such that the bridle slips at the right torque threshold but also stops slipping at the appropriate threshold as well.

I have tried not using any breaking grease on the walls of an auto barrel and the result was that it simply refused to slip at all, so grease was necessary to lubricate the slipping action.

I suspect that once the bridle is slipping though it is better to have it slip little and often rather than a lot every now and again as this would result in a more even power delivery and therefore better time keeping.

The breaking grease controls the amount of slip by virtue of the shear properties of the grease between the bridle and the barrel wall, low shear strength gives more slip, high shear strength slips less, zero shear strength and the bridle slips continuously.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thank you everyone for your input, and sorry for the late reply, I assumed I'd get an email but I didn't get emails even though I was following my topic

I was told Omega 550 barrels required 6.0 R - looking at the list, ETA 2671 is 7.3 R - I'm hoping it'll work as it's the closest I could get - still looking for confirmations from friends, I'll post a definitive update if it works or gets refuted

The outer smallest diameter of the 550 barrel is 11mm, 7.3 seems like safe entry

"shimano roller brake grease" is available locally, I'm probably going to pick an off the shelf Molybdenum disulphide based grease and use it, so far I'm set on the shimano one

Just realised the source of my confusion now

I was suggested a Bergeon size 6 - which isn't 6.00 mm ... so the target size for 550's are 9.8 and 7.3 is likely small

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...