Jump to content

Jaeger memovox 8 days desk clock, need help with balance staff!


panchoskywalker

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I need your help with this clock I bought, the balance staff is broken so I bought a new one and 2 watchmakers have told me it is not the correct staff but the seller insist that this is actually the correct staff. The movement is caliber 219.

When I compare both staff I notice that:

1. The new balance staff seem too fat to be inserted in the balance wheel (1 watchmaker told me that).

2. The new balance staff seem bigger that the old one (another watchmaker told me that).

So I took these pictures to see if you can give your advice.

The second watchmaker told ma that the old staff can be "repaired" by recreating the "end point" and lowering the jewel. I don't know what to think about that alternative.

 

 

1.jpg

2.jpg

3.jpg

4.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I,ll start this off, firstly you could turn the new staff down to fit, secondly yes reforming the end pivot and lowering the jewel is acceptable.
Personally I would like the correct staff to be fitted, i havent my bestfit books with me as they have some small clocks in them and might tell you what staff to use, i know you say you have the correct one, does this mean now that the balance wheel has been changed in the past? hence why your "correct" staff is incorrect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for your comment. I am not aware if the balance wheel has been changed in the past as I bought the clock 1 month ago. I though I did found a complete wheel and staff from a seller on ebay but the staff was broken too so I brought everything to the second watchmaker I mentioned so he could reform the end pivot on the broken staff, or do the same on the new staff. I imagine that profesional tools and skills are required to do that job. I'll visit him on friday to see what he have done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi, guys I have a bit of a predicament and hopefully, somebody can advise. I'm working on a Roamer MST 521 where the movement is extracted from the crystal side. I'm now at the final hurdle where I need to replace the movement back into its case but I'm not sure of the correct procedure. I still need to fit the hands but that's where the problem lies. If I insert the winding stem to test the hands for correct alignment I will need to turn the movement over to release the stem again it's the spring-loaded type and needs a small bit of force to push down but with the hands fitted, I don't think I can do this on a cushion without causing some damage to the hands and that's the last thing I want to do, this watch has already been a love-hate relationship and I'm so close to boxing this one off which I'm counting as my first major project.  The other option is to case the movement then fit the hands and hope everything is okay. I've already broken the original winding stem but managed to find a replacement, the last one in stock, so I'm a bit reluctant to keep removing it. Any suggestions would be appreciated. 
    • I would go for the dearer spring. You won't need to remove the spring from the carrier ring and then use a mainspring winder to get it into the barrel, for a start. Also that spring is closer to the needed dimensions, especially the length. The length plays a part in the mainsprings strength. If you double the length you will half the force (strength) of the spring and vice-versa. A spring with 20 mm less length would be about 7% shorter, so technically would be 7% more strength, but I find halving this number is closer to real-world findings, so the spring would be about 3 to 4% more strength/force. On a mainspring that ideally kicks out 300 degrees of amplitude, a 3% increase in amplitude would be 309 degrees. Increasing or decreasing the length of the mainspring will affect the power reserve to a greater or lesser degree. It depends how much shorter or longer it is.
    • I recently bought this but not on ebay. I figured if I want something Japanese I better check Japanese auction sites since these don't seem to pop up on ebay. I paid 83 € plus shipping & taxes. I think it was pretty reasonable for a complete set in good condition.
    • Did you take the friction pinion off the large driving wheel and grease it? Although, now that I think about it, that shouldn't have any effect on the free running of the train if the friction pinion isn't interacting withe minute wheel/setting wheel...
    • I did in fact use Rodico to get the spring into general position and "hold" it there while I used a fine oiler to make subtle positional adjustments.
×
×
  • Create New...