Jump to content

Recycling And Thinking Outside Of The Box


Recommended Posts

I have been working on a valjoux 7740 chronograph and found quite a few problems with it. Already we are over budget on parts, but that's how it goes sometimes. The barrel was very worn and all the teeth were worn to around half length on another wheel. But now the watch is running fine I just have the Flyback lever to deal with.

 

It is common for flyback levers to break where it is bent down 90ºs in order to engage the reset pusher but unfortunately the flyback lever for the 7740 is obsolete, can't find one on ebay so I thought it would be fun to see what I can do with the broken one.

 

Not sure how this will pan out as I have not finished it yet but in theory this should work. Whenever I think outside the box like this I always try to think of non-destructive ways to execute the job so that it can be reversed easily if required. In this case, I am not modifying the watch movement in any way - just the broken flyback lever - this way, if a flyback lever is ever found in the future then it can be fitted with no problem and my modification discarded.

 

As for recycling - I decided to use an old watch back for the material, because - why not?

 

 

This is where the flyback lever goes...

 

post-1-0-39188200-1436864807_thumb.jpg

 

I softened the original flyback lever and drilled a hole - I am going to rivet an angled piece in order to engage the lever with the pusher.

 

post-1-0-44282800-1436864840_thumb.jpg

 

So I cut a piece out of a watch back :)

 

post-1-0-32975200-1436864912_thumb.jpg

 

Bent it about 90ºs and drilled a hole in it for the rivet.

 

post-1-0-89676900-1436864966_thumb.jpg

 

Turned a rivet on the lathe...

 

post-1-0-58035200-1436865016_thumb.jpg

 

And tried it all for size...

 

post-1-0-81923100-1436865075_thumb.jpg

 

So I now have to re-harden and temper the lever, then rivet the material to it, clean it all up, and give it a test.

 

This may not pan out - but it's fun thinking outside of the box. I will update the thread to let you know wether it worked or not.

 

 

What about you - any "out of the box" repair stories to share?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now this is interesting... your "thinking out of the box" is what I like the most about watch repairing: sometimes parts are just nowhere to be found, and that's the only way you can make an old timepiece come back to life...  :thumbsu:

 

Will keep an eye on this thread to see the outcome, which I already know will be successfull.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well - it turned out OK.

 

Initially my rivet was fouling the screw and the hammer but a bit of whittling sorted it out.

 

Riveted in place...

 

post-1-0-70043800-1436870344_thumb.jpg

 

 

Just a bit of cleanup and it will be fine - functionally it works perfectly.

 

post-1-0-24448900-1436870345_thumb.jpg

 

post-1-0-76653100-1436870345_thumb.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
    • Once a movement has the dial and hands put back and it is recased, would you expect the assembled watch to have the same amplitude as when the movement is in a movement holder and is without hands and dial? Thanks
    • C07641+ not sure what the "+" is for after the last digit.
×
×
  • Create New...