Jump to content

1961 Bulova 23 10BZAC restoration--how much is enough?


Recommended Posts

I posted about this watch on the timing sub-thread, but thought I'd share the completed project here.

For background, I purchased this watch on eBay for $32 all in ($25 for the watch, $6 tax and shipping). 

It was listed as a non-runner with significant dial damage, so I knew it would never pass for much more than a project watch since the cosmetics were so rough (first three pictures). 

I serviced the movement, including removing and cleaning the 'sealed' mainspring. Did not have to replace or correct any parts.

Once I got the movement in running order, I started to try to clean up the dial.

First I soaked it for a few minutes in warm water, hoping that would remove the lacquer. However whatever was used at Bulova was much harder than other dial coatings and it didn't budge. So I soaked it in acetone knowing that would probobly remove the painted logo and dial markings (it did) I cleaned up the numerals and applied a fresh coat of acrylic lacquer (spray on). I also re-lumed the hands.

Overall turned out pretty nice, but don't think it is worth much as resale given the dial is now non-branded, so I'll probably keep it as a daily runner since I don't have a mechnical watch of my own. \

Was thinking about trying to apply a new logo using the technique that I saw in one of Mark's videos (using a transparent film-free decal paper), but the dial is black and laser printers don't print white.

Curious what you think--leave well enough alone or try some other method (or use laser decal method Mark used but maybe with red letters). 

BTW: I had the watch running at 0mm beat error before reinstalling the hands and re-casing. It slipped a bit as a result but decided .7mm is good enough for a 62 year old watch.

Dial original.jpg

Caseback.jpg

Movement.jpg

Dial refreshed.jpg

Caseback polished.jpg

IMG_0770.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, dadistic said:

The dial looks nice! I have one that has similar problems, maybe I'll  follow your lead with it. 

Cheers!

It did turn out nice, however whatever resale value it had (was hoping to recover my costs at least by reselling on eBay), has probably been lost. Still a nice daily runner once I get a nicer band for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I voted leave too, my reasoning was the the EU is undemocratic, no elected officials. I don't regret it but I  am sad that both sides acted like petulant toddlers.  Shameful.  I'm not on other forums but if I was and left this site, would you shun me? Of course not, we aren't petulant toddlers.  
    • This is a type of tool that may be suitable to remove the bezel - though note that I'm pretty sure the watch should be face down - not face up, as in some of the photos of these tools on amazon & ebay! If you try one one of those, put the movement screws back in first to avoid accidents. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Removal-Professional-Remover-Watchmaker-Diameter/dp/B09XCH4QVN?source=ps-sl-shoppingads-lpcontext&ref_=fplfs&smid=A296NCMMFVXSDN&th=1  
    • Hi, I’m constantly asking my wife to help me with removing the stem in order to complete casing. To expand, this is not a challenge for me when the setting lever is secured by a screw (older calibers). However when the setting lever is attached to a spring loaded setting lever axel, like on more modern calibers, I simply don’t see how to apply enough pressure on the button to get the stem out short of putting the movement face down with the dial and hands attached, which I’m loath to do in order to avoid damaging the dial/hands? what technique should I be using? thanks  
    • Many thanks for your advice (being borne in mind at present) & offer Dell. When I was given the clock the plastic anchor was loose on the arbour (it had split at the 'hole') &, after repairing this, I have been trying to determine whether the spindle (pin) should be perpendicular when the pallet is sitting on a flat surface; or whether, when installed, its L-R extremes (or alternatively its tick & tock points) should lie at equal angles from the vertical when moved with spring absent. I can get the clock to run but in every such configuration the top block has to be turned anti-clockwise (from above) by quite a bit in order to be 'in beat' & it always runs fast (despite the pendulum being set to as slow as possible). This makes me wonder if there is any particular feature of/fault in a torsion spring clock which determines which turn direction (if any) is necessary to get it 'in beat'; & whether there would be a different set of settings that would get it running nearer to time at somewhere around the mid timing/inertia position which would then allow tweaking of the fast/slow setting.
    • Now this has happened I bet China or India just to name two will start to produce none genuine parts.  I did. But idiot Boris Johnson failed miserably in his negotiations. The E U stitched up the UK like a kipper. Nigel Farage  offered his help but big head Boris declined. So this is why we are in this mess all because Johnson wasn't clever enough.  
×
×
  • Create New...