Jump to content

1956 Bulova President 10BU movement work in progress


Recommended Posts

Just got this lovely little lad. Only just started researching, but thanks to @GuyMontag's suggestion, it appears to be a President. This thread at MyBulova backs that up.

Edit: also this thread at MyBulova that Guy linked, describing the "President P" variant. I haven't been able to find any other pictures or advertisements or mentions of the charcoal dial on the internet, but my Google-fu may not be strong enough.

It came to me fully wound and not running. Found some corrosion by the stem and on the crown wheel, so we'll have to see what's deeper inside.

Giving the balance a little push, it seems to want to run, but it feels gummy. The last Bulova movement I worked on had the lubricant in the jewels turn rock hard, and it felt exactly like this, so I'm hoping a good cleaning and service will fix it.

The face is in pretty rough shape around the diamonds, and I think I spy a fingerprint or two.

20221223_170232.thumb.jpg.8178736ea5065b98776abc436e3efa64.jpg

20221225_000305.thumb.jpg.7019b6b8838200894e9863a9f5f688d5.jpg

20221225_000432.thumb.jpg.58a918ac995645dcc2a3dd6628690294.jpg

20221225_000512.thumb.jpg.0f905c98d74a0d496e99d39fd534b4f1.jpg

20221225_000755.thumb.jpg.c079b9807e010c61c4fcb14d51709396.jpg

20221225_000801.thumb.jpg.f3db46b4cb92c336b9e415b16d614783.jpg

Anyway, I'll keep y'all updated of my progress as I go!

 

Edited by ManSkirtBrew
added link
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, ManSkirtBrew said:

Just got this lovely little lad. Only just started researching, but thanks to @GuyMontag's suggestion, it appears to be a President. This thread at MyBulova backs that up.

Edit: also this thread at MyBulova that Guy linked, describing the "President P" variant. I haven't been able to find any other pictures or advertisements or mentions of the charcoal dial on the internet, but my Google-fu may not be strong enough.

It came to me fully wound and not running. Found some corrosion by the stem and on the crown wheel, so we'll have to see what's deeper inside.

Giving the balance a little push, it seems to want to run, but it feels gummy. The last Bulova movement I worked on had the lubricant in the jewels turn rock hard, and it felt exactly like this, so I'm hoping a good cleaning and service will fix it.

The face is in pretty rough shape around the diamonds, and I think I spy a fingerprint or two.

20221223_170232.thumb.jpg.8178736ea5065b98776abc436e3efa64.jpg

20221225_000305.thumb.jpg.7019b6b8838200894e9863a9f5f688d5.jpg

20221225_000432.thumb.jpg.58a918ac995645dcc2a3dd6628690294.jpg

20221225_000512.thumb.jpg.0f905c98d74a0d496e99d39fd534b4f1.jpg

20221225_000755.thumb.jpg.c079b9807e010c61c4fcb14d51709396.jpg

20221225_000801.thumb.jpg.f3db46b4cb92c336b9e415b16d614783.jpg

Anyway, I'll keep y'all updated of my progress as I go!

 

You have an import code there msb, is it axo ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Corrosion doesn't seem too extensive. Other than the outer half of the stem, the keyless works look pretty good. There's some on the center wheel arbor, which may need replacing.

Someone scratched "8020" into the back of the dial.

Lots of side shake in the barrel bridge. Going to have to close that hole up. Definitely going to need a mainspring.

Overall though, could be worse. I don't see any cracked jewels or anything alarming. Yet.

 

20221227_223140.jpg

20221227_223147.jpg

20221227_224314.jpg

20221227_230534.jpg

20221227_230605.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Finally got back to work on this one, and boy did it clean up nicely. Only part replaced was the mainspring. It could probably use a new stem, and I lost the little spring on the stem during cleaning, but otherwise just cleaned and lubricated.

I polished the crystal with red rouge, then automotive plastic polish, and the results are nothing short of stunning. Despite the dial being a disaster up close, it really looks great on the wrist.

image.thumb.png.a5f86471bcb60719e08d7482b6d9c5cf.png

20230425_223111.thumb.jpg.e17542d802f8051e0284481e17a2ca61.jpg20230425_223137.thumb.jpg.269ee5df56e226b98d7144140b2e5134.jpg20230425_223126.thumb.jpg.83c6c3d639121977beee1b8010d6495f.jpg

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Sorry to revive this old thread, but I could use some help.

I noticed today that the movement is loose in the case--when I wind or set the time, it wiggles the whole movement.

I'm not super experienced with front loaders. Is the friction between the dial and bezel what's supposed to hold it in place? It doesn't seem like there's enough here.

20230716_195002.thumb.jpg.317951b3a41df79aac968dd3817d8b2f.jpg

20230716_200109.thumb.jpg.b20de4eaca3206c60ed634b60755da5c.jpg

 

The movement ring on the back is free to spin in the case back, but it seems trapped in place (I haven't tried to force it out).

Edit: my other thought is looking at this lip on the movement ring. Is it possible the ring is supposed to go between the dial and movement? I'm still not sure how that would hold the movement in place, though.

20230716_195133.thumb.jpg.f71716aeff3856e7c1f3f76cb6704bd0.jpg

 

Oh wait, I just remembered something. There was a spring on the stem when I got it that somehow evaporated during cleaning. Could that be what keeps the movement centered? Seems weird, but I guess anything is possible.

If so, where does one find such a tiny replacement spring?

image.png.3f01b8eba0acec2e13bb594e1cef55b8.png

Edited by ManSkirtBrew
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

I don't know but a while back we had a misunderstanding about front loaders.  To me the back is removable but the movement comes out of the front, to you the back isn't removable. Does anyone know the answer or is it a mute point  

Looks like a one-piece case to me (monocoque).  Perhaps there was a reflector ring that interfaced to the bezel to hold the movement in place.  I cannot find this case in the Bullova Case Parts Catalog.  I do not see a movement number stamped on the inside where I would expect it.  If there is a number (not visible from the pictures) post that number.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This watch has a 1956 date on the caseback which is before Bulova started using case numbers so it won't be in the case parts catalog. I don't have this watch but I have a handful that are somewhat similar.

 

 

2.thumb.jpg.fe1d298ed4341fa10a5bf5728f887ff2.jpg

1.thumb.jpg.a943ca05036d220af78ead3915f86c5a.jpg

 

None of them have a moveable ring like on yours. When the movements are in the case they are somewhat difficult to get out, I have to pry them up to get them to pop out.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GuyMontag said:

I have to pry them up to get them to pop out.

That definitely does not describe mine. It just falls right out the front.

If I get some time tonight I'll pop off the dial and see what I can discover. Thanks for the info!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

I don't know but a while back we had a misunderstanding about front loaders.  To me the back is removable but the movement comes out of the front, to you the back isn't removable. Does anyone know the answer or is it a mute point  

I do not know the official meaning of "front loader" but when I use the term, I mean that there is no back that can be removed.  Many pocket watches come out the front even though the back can be opened or removed.

Please, no offense, but it is "moot" and not "mute."  A common error.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

I do not know the official meaning of "front loader" but when I use the term, I mean that there is no back that can be removed.  Many pocket watches come out the front even though the back can be opened or removed.

Please, no offense, but it is "moot" and not "mute."  A common error.

You are correct and something I  once knew.  No offence at  all. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok thanks Ross, I will give that a try!😁
    • Welcome my friend. 
    • Been there. Worn that Tshirt.  'ping'. Hands and knees. Nothing. Nada. 20 minutes? Ha! I found it 7 month later. How? Well, after advice from a member, I invested in a £4 UV light torch.  Hands and knees looking for a 'ping' from a Sekonda, found them both within 30 seconds. UV makes the jewel shine. easy peasy. Could have taken longer. Just lucky on the location of the search. Hope this helps.
    • Thanks Dell. I thought about silver soldering. Have never done it but would like to give it a go. Do you think to put flux on the butted joint then run the solder in or to maybe brace it with a piece of scrap spring steel?
    • Never and others. Yes, like you I do spend a fair amount of time reading the contents of this forum. I find it better that any other. Clear, lucid, no Prima Donas, and most of all an easy access without adverts. All thanks to Mark. God bless you mate. You give so much to many of us. What if? No Mark? Hypothetically. A forum. I did run a forum for a few years. Really enjoyed it, but became so engrossed that it did affect my health. I gave to to others to run. Not been back. It was very successful and rivalled a number of large paying sites. No adverts, no others but me. I did ask and listen to members comments and it worked well.    Costs Having a domain name, £10 annually.  Register the site with a forum company, free. Build the site using the forum company guide lines, free. It looked and ran almost the same a Mark's. All the same facilities. The cost was only £5 per month, but counted visits (views). If I recall, it was that price for 5,000 views. Each extra 5,000 views increased the price by £2 per month. Success was my own personal undoing. From £5 per month initially, it rose to £60 a month and looked like increasing. This was 10 years ago. I could not afford that, and asked it anyone would like to take over and someone did. I would assume that this is the price that Mark is funding for us all. His return is our continued comments on the internet about his course, and the fact that many of the big names on YouTube mention him as their Tutor. Those of us who have done, and are still using, his course, benefit. In comparison to other courses, I can't believe how cheap it is, and the value is exceptional. It is the structure that gives the value. Long may Mark reign. Ross  
×
×
  • Create New...