Jump to content

Missing mainspring barrel cover - TWICE


Recommended Posts

Is it common for inexpensive watch movements to NOT have a mainspring barrel cover?

This seems like a dumb question, but i'll ask it because i have now encountered it on two separate watches. I took the pictures below while i was disassembling the watches.

Both watches came from family junk drawers so i can't confirm they haven't been taken apart, but i seriously doubt it.

The first is a "Punchy" watch, a promotion for Hawaiian Punch. It is a Ronda 1213 movement, which usually has a barrel cover.

09896F2A-8F24-42CB-8C42-83677465F415_1_105_c.thumb.jpeg.9aa870fb9d03e26dfab7307382d4aae2.jpeg9A2ACD4E-91D9-462C-9DE3-FAD6BA680E8F_1_201_a.thumb.jpeg.9990c80cb77ff6f24c73942f24b8003c.jpeg

The second watch is a Ravisa costume jewelry watch. I'm not sure what the movement is, but the information on the Train of Wheel bridge is as follows: C2, 17 Jewels, Unadjusted, 4113 Swiss but it's not a 4113 movement.

 296BE87E-DB03-49BD-A671-300A9B54622E_1_105_c.thumb.jpeg.429ce31352ca61e2a908da49f10c4a7c.jpeg6E9282C8-2A22-4FF4-8FEF-4D91214EDCE5_1_201_a.thumb.jpeg.3abc8c64bb98a30f200e82f870cef5c0.jpeg

Thank you very much!

Steve

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Paul80 said:

Don't know how common it is but I have definitely seen low cost watches with no barrel cap and was sure they where designed that way

The keyword here is low cost watches. Depending upon when they made them or who made them a variety of cost-cutting measures. Like some watches really are Not meant to be serviced at all as they have no screws because screws and threading the holes cost money. Having a barrel Costs money if you can get by without one saves you money. Remember these are probably assembled by machinery machinery if you ever see a video of a watch going together everything will fit perfect as opposed to a struggling with trying to put one of these back together again. This is why often times instead of having separate plates over like the barrel in the gear train the watch might just have one entire plate covering everything. They made at a cost and corners or things had to be cut like barrel lids than just a whole bunch of other stuff.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Paul80 said:

Don't know how common it is but I have definitely seen low cost watches with no barrel cap and was sure they where designed that way

@Paul80Thank you! and your spelling is perfect. I'd be in a world of hurt without spell check. 

4 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

The keyword here is low cost watches. Depending upon when they made them or who made them a variety of cost-cutting measures. Like some watches really are Not meant to be serviced at all as they have no screws because screws and threading the holes cost money. Having a barrel Costs money if you can get by without one saves you money. Remember these are probably assembled by machinery machinery if you ever see a video of a watch going together everything will fit perfect as opposed to a struggling with trying to put one of these back together again. This is why often times instead of having separate plates over like the barrel in the gear train the watch might just have one entire plate covering everything. They made at a cost and corners or things had to be cut like barrel lids than just a whole bunch of other stuff.

 

 

 

@JohnR725Aha, makes sense. I have a cheap pocket watch that has no screws and decided not to mess with it. Also, explains why i have had some trouble reassembling these, aside from being new to watchmaking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 6 months later...

Update that may be of interest.

I was watching a YouTube video from Chronoglide and Kalle was working on a very nice Gerald Genta watch, movement 2034. I also did NOT have a barrel cover. It was mentioned that perhaps this was to save space.

I found it interesting that a higher end movement would also be missing its barrel cover.

Live and learn! 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, signcarver said:

Update that may be of interest.

I was watching a YouTube video from Chronoglide and Kalle was working on a very nice Gerald Genta watch, movement 2034. I also did NOT have a barrel cover. It was mentioned that perhaps this was to save space.

I found it interesting that a higher end movement would also be missing its barrel cover.

Live and learn! 🙂

I was about to mention that video !  Not a cheap watch, £10k ?

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have it, so until we get a lunch one day , nearly everyday is with my mum at the moment.
    • In the meantime whilst awaiting a better plan, please drop me a quick hello on my email. 
    • I looked at it like this, I've built a lot of stuff in my time, building structures and furniture,those are my creations and they will still be here way way after I'm gone. Traditional watchmakers felt the need to pass their knowledge on, ideas that they created . I assume with them as it is with me, leaving their mark on the earth, a way of being remembered. This creation of Mark's has brought thousands of people together to pass their knowledge around,  ideas that will continue to be used for lifetimes. Ideas that should continue to be procured. If for whatever reason the forum ceased to exist, not quite like Ranfft's, that didn't disappear but much less usable. Then that is sad, such a massive loss of communication between good people and a wealth of knowledge lost. There should be something in place for when that happens which could be next week, next year or in 10 years. Might not be a topical subject for a lot of folk or boardering on controversy, i did say i talk about stuff other people dont. But if you dont talk about it and something happens then you've lost it and you ain't gonna fix it .
    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...