Jump to content

Never seen one like this, without a pallet fork that is


Recommended Posts

Evening,

This came in a job lot, and I thought I'd have a crack at a ladies watch. Mostly as it's a little bigger than a lot of others. Looked in good shape with a rolled gold back to it. As a guess 1940s ish?

20221215_175257.thumb.jpg.a88eaead7841c6d59e95baff94003c51.jpg

 

 

20221215_175343.thumb.jpg.b599d45b771677e639468038efdc8488.jpg

 

20221215_180748.thumb.jpg.69f2d095ad973f04c4707dd898e1dbd4.jpg

What really caught me by surprise was the fact it doesn't have a pallet fork. I thought fairly unusual after I realised that I'd not lost anything, it was never there to begin with. Anybody else seen one like this? Does it have a particular technical name for type of movement?

20221215_182239.thumb.jpg.2bdf93e931fe9b3f37a575a2b04210cb.jpg

 

20221215_183348.thumb.jpg.0fbfa9e854b348c55735e6693211d1bf.jpg

Which left me wondering as to who the maker is and it's real age. There are two marks, something that looks like a "TR" contained in a shield and "AS175".

Looking on the ole interweb I think it's possibly an A.Schild. Have I identified it correctly?

20221215_180814.thumb.jpg.8b397f34b117a6f53d6dd91a8975abfd.jpg

20221215_180822.thumb.jpg.71cf6944a232573c25ea90a34918a10a.jpg

Thanks in advance for any insights.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Bearman said:

What really caught me by surprise was the fact it doesn't have a pallet fork. I thought fairly unusual after I realised that I'd not lost anything, it was never there to begin with. Anybody else seen one like this? Does it have a particular technical name for type of movement?

I think Its called a " cylinder escapement"     have one that hasn't been serviced in past forty years but starts and runs as soon as you wind.

Rgds

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As @Nucejoesays, that's a cylinder escapement. The only one I've ever worked on was also in a ladies' movement, which was super tiny. Really interesting mechanism!

As for the maker's mark, looks like "Ebauches Trust" to me:

image.png.b002da1449cb8eedd6d8e35ab4f358e8.png

I found these pictures with a web search for "mechanical watch manufacturer stamp."

image.thumb.png.0e8f097d30a0027c6da7104ec8eb355a.pngimage.thumb.png.08bc44158fdaa2112005f3b1bff46d94.pngimage.thumb.png.812aa89c5195fc4ea77ab0639ef72f29.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, cylinder escapement. Hard to time on a lot of modern timing equipment but member praezis has a killer software that will pick up all sorts of escapements (and is Witschi level+ otherwise).

 

Very important to have all power off before removing balance. Otherwise business as usual, lubricate escapement with 9415.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all, I've since found a few youtube videos on the cylinder escapement, really interesting. You learn something new all the time. 

@ManSkirtBrewthanks for confirming my suspicions regarding "Ebauches Trust" I reckon the watch is probably 1930's now. Done some digging on the history of them and it seems they were a forerunner to what is now ETA with a link to a number of makers back then.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I will advice to share the idea first here before doeing something to the movement
    • When you move the index which changes the timing from an extreme fast to an extreme slow, is there a big change in beat error? Obviously there will be a big change in timing. If there is a big difference in BE then this is strongly inferring the the end-curve of the hairspring isn't set correctly or/and the collet is central to the jewel on the balance cock, because the hairspring that is breathing between the curb pin and boot is being pushed and/or pulled when you move the index from left to right. Also not having the hairspring set correctly can dramatically reduce the amplitude. A quick check is to take power off the movement and move the index from extreme fast to slow and with high magnification see if the hairspring sits nicely between the curb pin and boot at all times (give the balance a spin and watch the hairspring - has it got total freedom?) or if it moves by being pushed or pulled by the curb pin or boot. I'm guessing it is the latter. I think that may be a possibility to your problem.
    • I can't get windingstens.com to open but you need a  few measurements. 
    • All Done, Here are the finished pictures: This one shows the generic "one-size-fits-all" base which accepts the bespoke rings - notice that the parametric movement OD (27.40 mm) automatically prints on the ring 🙂 From another angle: Here is the ring about to go into the base: And finally the base and ring together: Here it is next to a pen for scale: On my system with 20% fill each ring will take about 18 mins to print, but I am sure this could be optimised: Here is the screenshot of the spreadsheet in FreeCAD, you just need to change one value to create the ring in cell C3, (the base doesn't need any changes). I just uploaded the files to printables link here, but also include  here as a fake pdf, please change the .pdf to .zip to make the file work once downloaded: Modular Movement Holder.pdf Any feedback welcome!     I'm also going to make a parametric ring insert for rectangular/oval movements - but I just finished a parent teacher evening so too tired now 🙂  
×
×
  • Create New...