Jump to content

anyone know if this is a makers mark


Recommended Posts

It's not in the BestFit catalogue. I'm not sure it's a makers mark on that side. Is there anything on the other side?

If not, can you give the size, and a better pic of the keyless work to look up in BestFit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume that you're asking about the cross - that I'm assuming indicates the watch is Swiss.

As Mike suggests, tell us the movement diameter and (if you can) remove the balance complete and look at the location on the main plate where the balance was to see if there's a mark there.

And (as Mike said) a better photo of the keyless configuration - possibly brush it off with a toothbrush or clean it up some?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quite a number of makers stamped a Federal/Swiss cross on the movement.

There are also a number of makers who used that cross as part of their makers mark, so as others have said, and as I suspect, the keyless work is more likely to yield a clue as to the maker.

image.png.a2b1799f1980bf8c91409f4078dc66f1.png
.. for example ..

You may find makers marks on the hidden side of the bridges or under the balance. There is no consistent place to look unfortunately, and some movements, particularly older ones, are really difficult to place.

Brevet.thumb.jpg.7bf83196d48057cc27e17af8b7085671.jpg

 

Brevet incidentally means "Patent" so far as I am aware, and is not a particular manufacturer.

For example this piece that google provided when I searched for Brevet watch 🥴

 

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks for the replies, the maker according to the dial is Eszeha (Chopard), there is nothing on the movement side to indicate cal or maker so I was just wondering if it was a marriage and the movement had been replaced at sometime, I now do not think that is the case, probaby just a case of simply no makers mark at the time, I realise now the cross means Swiss manufacture. Thank you again for answers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, quantieme said:

the maker according to the dial is Eszeha (Chopard)

Not sure about this. Eszeha means "sch". According Mikrolisk a German maker (of the watch, not the movement).

Frank

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could it be this?

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&Gruen_267

 

image.png.cc77d0692e66ae384d0ff0ce47e2aba6.png

I looked up Swiss Patent 51482 on Google.

Ranfft's descriptions contains the following info.

Quote

Remarks
1920-
bimetallic screw balance

Swiss Patent 51482:
filed 05-03-1910, FHF, Fabrique d'Horlogerie de Fontainemelon (CH)
setting mechanism without setting-lever spring
 

 

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/23/2022 at 7:17 PM, AndyHull said:

Quite a number of makers stamped a Federal/Swiss cross on the movement.

There are also a number of makers who used that cross as part of their makers mark, so as others have said, and as I suspect, the keyless work is more likely to yield a clue as to the maker.

image.png.a2b1799f1980bf8c91409f4078dc66f1.png
.. for example ..

You may find makers marks on the hidden side of the bridges or under the balance. There is no consistent place to look unfortunately, and some movements, particularly older ones, are really difficult to place.

Brevet.thumb.jpg.7bf83196d48057cc27e17af8b7085671.jpg

 

Brevet incidentally means "Patent" so far as I am aware, and is not a particular manufacturer.

For example this piece that google provided when I searched for Brevet watch 🥴

 

Brevet does translate to patent Andy. Lots of makers have this stamp sometimes on the case back. I assume the movement has something particular abouts its design that has been patented.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Technically you are correct (the best kind of correct), although if we are being pedantic Brevet d'invention (Fr) would be the correct French equivalent of the English word 'patent'.


So Brevet is more like certificate or certified, however in this context my understanding is that '+ brevet 51482' is an abbreviation of "Swiss brevet d'invention 51482"

As you say, that refers to a particular invention, function or feature of the watch that is subject to that patent, rather than the whole watch, which couldn't be subject to a single patent, (but the whole watch could be subject to some other form of design copyright or design registration certification).

On a related but slightly tangential note, the patent could have been reviewed by one Albert Einstein -> https://www.ige.ch/en/about-us/the-history-of-the-ipi/einstein/einstein-at-the-patent-office

This particular patent is discussed here -> https://www.vintagewatchstraps.com/fontainemelon.php

image.thumb.png.dc3d126233719f482e6e4784447b62f3.png

This all seems to make sense in light of the Ranfft mechanism I linked to above, since the Gruen 267  is an FHF -  (FHF 1144, 10.5''') and the patent is an FHF patent.

Edited by AndyHull
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No - not the watchmaster. The tanks are standalone - you manually move from US Wash to pre-rinse to US-Rinse. After the US Rinse I manually shake the basket to release some fluid and then it goes to the dryer, which does spin and heat (but the drips go into the machine). I guess my question is really around the heating temp (is 70°C reasonable) - I agree the Elmadry is expensive but I can likely find something much cheaper. Also in terms of productivity and consistency I'm trying to avoid the manual blowdrying method (although I agree it would work). I have a workflow that I try to stick to - and I have tasks that I like to do while the dryer is running...
    • After a bit of the Parrot Sketch with Cousins website the GS recommended 1.60 x 0.135 x 660 x 14.5 size appears in my shopping cart. I figured Cousins of all should have parts for these Smiths and of course they have many of them once I found where to look... Three days to the US, then assembly.  I shall update the results...
    • Not sure the following will help you @signcarverbut I made the following note in my book where I record my experiences and thoughts in watch repair. Replacing the arbor. Insert the arbor so that the arbor hook goes in where the innermost coil has its widest section (between the innermost and second innermost coil) to facilitate getting the arbor inside the innermost coil. Then, using brass tweezers, rotate the arbor so that the arbor hook goes into the eye of the innermost coil. I also made the following "ugly" illustration. With some movements, it's a very tight fit, for example, Vostok movements. Hope it helps!
    • Thanks for the replies guys, I think you are both right in what you say, I suppose the brand name on the front of the watch really doesn't have anything to do with what is going on inside. I did find quite a bit of information and background on the movement manufacturer which is actually quite fascinating so I will settle with that knowledge and move on to the next one I think. Thanks!
    • John's eyesight is usually better than mine.  You might not need to remove the balance & cock assembly, as its  the  outer coil that seems to be sticking, if so use a clean needle or oiler to seperate the two sticking coils, plenty of space there right after the bend of terminal curve for the needle.   Good luck        
×
×
  • Create New...