Jump to content

Looking for help identifying approximate date and information of this 14k ladies Rolex


Recommended Posts

Hello! I tried posting this on Rolexforums.com but didn't get any responses.  I know that the Cameleon/chameleon was generally made circa 1950s-60s and some in the 70s. I haven't been able to find anything regarding this specific reference number (or is it a case number?) 85008. I've also seen similar watches referred to as a reference 5003 but I can't find that anywhere on this case. I've found some nearly identical ones listed but different sources say different dates. Some say it's from the 1970s and others say the 1950s. Box looks more 50s to me but I don't want to be wrong by two decades when I try and sell it. I was wondering if anyone had any additional information/ads/lit or year that this may have been made? 14k case with 14k band and additional bands/box photos attached.

Thank you for any help you can provide.

Attached Images

PXL_20221114_132610026.jpg

PXL_20221114_132553129.jpg

PXL_20221114_132003057.jpg

PXL_20221114_131450592.jpg

PXL_20221111_183741827.jpg

PXL_20221111_183448064.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, mikepilk said:

As you can see on the movement, the calibre is 1400 - which was made from the 60s.

Try Googling something like "Ladies Rolex cal 1400" - quite a few for sale are listed.

I've seen that too but none of the sources I found seemed to be that reputable or comprehensive. The few that mentioned its manufactured date simply say "from the 1960s" which is vague and leads me to believe that they don't actually have that much information on it. It seems like the chameleon was released in 1953 and appear to be fairly consistent in size. The 1400 was the smallest movement produced by Rolex so if it wasn't the 1400 in 1953 I'm not sure which alternative caliber it could be? I have yet to find another chameleon with a different caliber which makes me suspicious that the caliber wasn't made at least a little prior to the 60s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi. Yes I get it , the slot in the end I’d to allow you to screw the button on whilst holding the pusher shaft. To remove the pusher tube you will need a tool such as the one shown by Richard. I think Ali Express the Chinese Amazon has replicas of the Horotec system for a lot less money, how effective they are not having had to use one. But as you said the way to go is complete removal and replacement, bodging it up will  lead to a repeat failure
    • It does look like it seems to be working again I'm getting emails.
    • One of the things that I've been bothered with lately is timekeeping? For instance a 90-year-old pocket watch what so to timekeeping was it supposed to keep? They publish railroad timekeeping but I don't know how well normal non-railroad watches were supposed to keep time. The reason why the question comes up for me is I spend a lot of time at work adjusting watches to keep really really good time  because I have to please my boss where as when the watch was made I have to wonder what kind timekeeping would've been acceptable. After all they typically didn't have timing machines 100 years ago and they were timing and six positions certainly not for the non-railroad grade watch. On the other hand I do get paid by the hour so maybe I shouldn't be concerned of how much time I Spend trying to make everything keep chronometer timekeeping almost. Citing a Delta of 40 seconds for a 90-year-old watch is quite outstanding.
    • That's an interesting question which I don't think I've seen explained anywhere. But I think the problem will go away just about instantaneously. In other words the  coating is really thin and it should go away almost immediately. So the problem should resolve itself extremely fast.  
    • I experienced that different types of shellac and their ages are affected differently by IPA. Sometimes the shellac dissolves in a few seconds and sometimes several minutes are required. Nowadays I never let shellac come into contact with IPA. It's a hotly debated topic here on WRT if you search. Like John, I don't think you need to worry about the weight of the shellac, but instead that it might start rubbing against something. When I learned how to adjust pallet stones, I tried documenting my experiences in this thread. Hopefully, it can help you. I personally don't believe in the idea of abrading the epilame before oiling so I don't think you need to think or worry about it. The only time I've heard anyone mention this is Alex on the YouTube channel Watch Repair Tutorials but actually no one else. I'm not saying it's "wrong" just that I don't think it's necessary or adds anything.
×
×
  • Create New...