Jump to content

Looking for help identifying approximate date and information of this 14k ladies Rolex


Recommended Posts

Hello! I tried posting this on Rolexforums.com but didn't get any responses.  I know that the Cameleon/chameleon was generally made circa 1950s-60s and some in the 70s. I haven't been able to find anything regarding this specific reference number (or is it a case number?) 85008. I've also seen similar watches referred to as a reference 5003 but I can't find that anywhere on this case. I've found some nearly identical ones listed but different sources say different dates. Some say it's from the 1970s and others say the 1950s. Box looks more 50s to me but I don't want to be wrong by two decades when I try and sell it. I was wondering if anyone had any additional information/ads/lit or year that this may have been made? 14k case with 14k band and additional bands/box photos attached.

Thank you for any help you can provide.

Attached Images

PXL_20221114_132610026.jpg

PXL_20221114_132553129.jpg

PXL_20221114_132003057.jpg

PXL_20221114_131450592.jpg

PXL_20221111_183741827.jpg

PXL_20221111_183448064.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, mikepilk said:

As you can see on the movement, the calibre is 1400 - which was made from the 60s.

Try Googling something like "Ladies Rolex cal 1400" - quite a few for sale are listed.

I've seen that too but none of the sources I found seemed to be that reputable or comprehensive. The few that mentioned its manufactured date simply say "from the 1960s" which is vague and leads me to believe that they don't actually have that much information on it. It seems like the chameleon was released in 1953 and appear to be fairly consistent in size. The 1400 was the smallest movement produced by Rolex so if it wasn't the 1400 in 1953 I'm not sure which alternative caliber it could be? I have yet to find another chameleon with a different caliber which makes me suspicious that the caliber wasn't made at least a little prior to the 60s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Never and others. Yes like you I do spend a fair amount of time reading the contents of this forum. I find it better that any other. clear, lucid, no Prima Donas, and most of all an easy access without adverts. All thanks to Mark. God bless you mate. You give so much to many of us. What if? No Mark? Hypothetically. A forum. I did run a forum for a few years. Really enjoyed it, but became so engrossed that it did affect my health. I gave to to others to run. Not been back. It was very successful and rivalled a number of large paying sites. No adverts, no others but me. I did ask and listen to members comments and it worked well.    Costs Having a domain name, £10 annually.  Register the site with a forum company, free. Build the site using the forum company guide lines, free. It looked and ran almost the same a Mark's. All the same facilities. The cost was only £5 per month, but counted visits (views). If I recall, it was that price for 5,000 views. Each extra 5,000 views increased the price by £2 per month. Success was my own personal undoing. From £5 per month initially, it rose to £60 a month and looked like increasing. This was 10 years ago. I could not afford that, and asked it anyone would like to take over and someone did. I would assume that this is the price that Mark is funding for us all. His return is our continued comments on the internet about his course, and the fact that many of the big names on YouTube mention him as their Tutor. Those of us who have done, and are still using, his course, benefit. In comparison to other courses, I can't believe how cheap it is, and the value is exceptional. It is the structure that gives the value. Long may Mark reign. Ross  
    • Get someone local to tig it ,very easy fix and should only take a few minutes so probably wouldn’t cost much ,or failing that get it very clean and silver solder it. Dell
    • Hi, The winding pin is not split, well that's how it was when I obtained the watch. The movement is front-loaded and here's a picture of where the case screws are fitted. The face picture is before I dismantled it. Quick update.  I've always had a nylon ring sitting in the parts try that I wasn't sure where it went and left it to the last thing as I know it must be part of the case assembly. Anyway, looking at the picture in my last post you can see, just under the winding stem, a white-looking object, this is the nylon ring 🤭 So, I had to remove the dial again and replace the ring. Once this was all back together I placed the movement in the case and realized my initial problem maybe is not a problem as it looks like I can screw the movement back in the case and then place the hands as the dial is nearly flush with the outside of the case anyway so I'll be able to check for alignment. if all is good then just fit the crystal and bezel 🤔 I can't think of any issues with this approach but please comment if you think I've not thought of something. Another lesson learned as well. Take more pictures not just of the movement parts and location 😅
    • I dont think mine is. Its an idea to have them all in one place if possible, then a quick screenshot will have them saved. Unless anyone has any other ideas of how to reconnect 
    • My email address is in my profile, feel free all to drop me a quick hello. 
×
×
  • Create New...