Jump to content

What is Levin "Hard" mean on a Levin lathe?

LittleWatchShop
 Share

Recommended Posts

nickelsilver Distinguished Member

nickelsilver

Posted
Posted

Hard steel cone bearings in the head. They had a lower grade headstock for a while that used bronze bearings there. Honestly not a big difference, and many extremely good machines used bronze bearings. But the "Hard" was the cream of their crop (until they went with angular contact ball bearings).

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Neverenoughwatches Distinguished Member

Neverenoughwatches

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, markr said:

It's happy to see you.

Haha there is few words in nickelsilver's explaination that i could JUMP on, but I'm just not going there. I'm  assuming the hardened steel bearings are less likely to GRIND to a halt if not regularly SERVICED. Just a thought as I'm not experienced enough to understand this TOOL and would hate to spark a BONE of contention on the subject so i will quietly EJECT myself away from the discussion in HAND. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nickelsilver Distinguished Member

nickelsilver

Posted
Posted

I'll be curious if the head fits your other Levin bed, and if the tailstock lines up with both heads. In theory they should, but I have seen enough Levin stuff that wasn't interchangeable that it put me off them in spite of the high quality (except for their cross slides, being head and shoulders above all others I use Levin there).

 

Levin based their design on the WW or Webster Whitcomb 50mm center height lathe, made by the American Watch Tool Company (later Derbyshire). WW made all the heads and tails to a specific standard, to make sure they were all interchangeable. Other makers tried to do the same (I know Leinen succeeded). I have a hunch that certain eras of Levin lathe parts are interchangeable and then there might have been a shaky period and then who knows- though I would hope that the much later machines were better.

 

One of the most ball-breaking tasks I've done is hand scrape a set of Levin head/tail/bed that were all made at different times to match each other. It was a favor for a friend too, I think I got a bottle of something for it, haha.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LittleWatchShop Distinguished Member

LittleWatchShop

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, nickelsilver said:

I'll be curious if the head fits your other Levin bed, and if the tailstock lines up with both heads.

This will certainly be enlightening. On my other lathes, the headstock and tailstock are serialized, so they were made together to match--even the bed is serialized.  As you noted, it appears that Levin does not do this...so...yeah, I am anxious.  I bought the ebay pair only because that was my only way to get the bed.  I plan to use the head/tail that I have on the newly acquired bed.

I have tested the head/tail on the bed that I have and they line up to the degree that I have been able to measure so far, so I am optimistic on the new bed.

Will probably put the HARD headstock back on ebay and just take what I can get.

7 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

One of the most ball-breaking tasks I've done is hand scrape a set of Levin head/tail/bed that were all made at different times to match each other.

How did you do this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nickelsilver Distinguished Member

nickelsilver

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

How did you do this?

It's a basic process (hand scraping) that can generate very high precision; on its most basic level you can get a surface very, very flat, on average, and very well aligned, absolutely. It gets  really tricky when more than two surfaces need to make contact and be aligned at the same time, like a WW lathe bed, haha.

 

For this project one of the two (head/tail) was loose on the bed, the other tight. That's the angular sides' contact. I scraped the bed down to obtain good contact with the loose one (I don't remember which was which), then I scraped the tight one to have good contact with the bed. I made a reference flat that could contact the base of the head and tail (for blue spotting) and had another bed I modified so it could only contact one side of the angular ways to use as a tool as I was bringing the alignment in. It's hard to explain, but you can imagine that you get "one shot"- if you suddenly have full contact, but the (let's say tail here) is pointing away from the head, there's no easy way back.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dadistic Distinguished Member

dadistic

Posted
Posted
On 11/17/2022 at 9:39 AM, nickelsilver said:

One of the most ball-breaking tasks I've done is hand scrape a set of Levin head/tail/bed that were all made at different times to match each other. It was a favor for a friend too, I think I got a bottle of something for it, haha.

Whoa! I didn't think *anyone* new how to do that anymore.  One of my early jobs was working for Sheldon Machine Corp, an old manufacturer of engine lathes. I worked close to a pair of old Polish guys, who hand scraped every lathe bed and croslide saddle that went through the factory.  They were amazing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LittleWatchShop Distinguished Member

LittleWatchShop

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, dadistic said:

Whoa! I didn't think *anyone* new how to do that anymore.  One of my early jobs was working for Sheldon Machine Corp, an old manufacturer of engine lathes. I worked close to a pair of old Polish guys, who hand scraped every lathe bed and croslide saddle that went through the factory.  They were amazing.

Maybe I should learn, but it looks both laborious and precise

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dadistic Distinguished Member

dadistic

Posted
Posted (edited)

Time consuming.  Unless you are those guys I worked with, who had been doing it for years and years. 

The other thing I've thought about  trying is the three plate method to make a polishing plate. So far, I've resisted the urge 🙂

 

 

Edited by dadistic
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LittleWatchShop Distinguished Member

LittleWatchShop

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, dadistic said:

Time consuming.  Unless you are those guys I worked with, who had been doing it for years and years. 

The other thing I've thought about  trying is the three plate method to make a polishing plate. So far, I've resisted the urge 🙂

 

 

Well, I have stepped in it. Bought two lathe beds. Will pick the one I like and resell the other.

Edited by LittleWatchShop
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ifibrin Super WRT Addict

ifibrin

Posted
Posted
On 11/18/2022 at 12:04 AM, nickelsilver said:

It's a basic process (hand scraping) that can generate very high precision; on its most basic level you can get a surface very, very flat, on average, and very well aligned, absolutely.

Can you do hand scraping on curved surfaces, such as a rod, while preserving a consistent diameter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nickelsilver Distinguished Member

nickelsilver

Posted
Posted
On 11/20/2022 at 3:58 AM, ifibrin said:

Can you do hand scraping on curved surfaces, such as a rod, while preserving a consistent diameter?

Something like a lathe spindle would be precision ground (and probably lapped) between centers. Then, on machines with soft bearings, the spindle would be used as the marking master to blue the bearing, and it would indeed be hand scraped. Not in every case, but in many.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ManSkirtBrew
      1972 Bulova President "E" Sea King 11ACACB movement

      By ManSkirtBrew · Posted

      Oh nice. I have a similar wedge style stump for my staking tool, so I'll give that a shot. Thanks!
    • joelcarvajal
      Gamblin Gamsol for cleaning?

      By joelcarvajal · Posted

      Thank you all for the replies!  Very informative! True enough, the Gamsol took some time to evaporate and does leave a residue. So not all naphtha are created equal!  Need to find alternatives then. i was able to try Hexane recommended by Alex and it seems great.  I wonder what the cons are?
    • GuyMontag
      1972 Bulova President "E" Sea King 11ACACB movement

      By GuyMontag · Posted

      Yeah, I saw that in the tech sheet but I don't see how it can be adequately cleaned with the friction pinion still in place. I've accidentally pulled the arbor right out of the wheel once when I used a presto tool to try and remove it. Mark shows how he does it with the Platax tool. Those are a little too pricey for me so I got one of these from Aliexpress and I just push down on the arbor with the end of my brass tweezers. That usually gets it most of the way out and then I just grab the wheel with one hand the and the friction pinion with the other and gently rotate them until it pops off. Probably not the best way but it's seemed to work for me so far.    
    • Zedster
      Movement inserted from crytal side

      By Zedster · Posted

      Thanks, Jon Sounds like a plan. Obviously I'll have the face on so do you think gripping with the holder will create any problems, but I will check in the morning to see how feasible it is but I assume it only needs to be lightly held. As for holding the movement instead of the holder won't be possible in this scenario as one hand will be puling on the stem while the other pushes the spring down. That was my initial concern is how the hell can I do this with only one pair of hands. All the other times I've had to remove the stem hasn't been a problem, apart from the force required to release the stem from the setting lever, but now I need to fit the face and hands its sent me into panic mode. If it had the screw type release things would be a lot simpler but that's life 😀   Another thing I will need to consider is once the dial and hands are fitted and the movement is sitting in the case I will need to turn it over to put the case screws in. I saw a vid on Wristwatch revival where he lightly fitted the crystal and bezel so he could turn it over, is this the only option or is there another method?      
    • nevenbekriev
      Main spring

      By nevenbekriev · Posted

      Hi Jon, do You think that relation spring torque - amplitude is linear? I would rather guess that the amplitude should be proportional to the square of the torque. I had once idea to check it, but still haven't.
×
×
  • Create New...