Jump to content

Too much end shake here?


Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I'm attempting to service an AS 1703 movement these days. It wasn't running when I got the watch, and I think the problem is excessive end-shake on the escape wheel. I'm attaching a picture of the train with the bridge to provide some context here.

IMG_3155.thumb.jpg.9df2ba956a3db8dabb3927eff11a0a0d.jpg

In these next two pictures I show the escape wheel pinion as seen from the escapement in its two extreme positions.

IMG_3158.thumb.jpg.596e5cfdec601e210d97ae6e85c63611.jpgIMG_3157.thumb.jpg.3e1742c6d21a6693fd659211c52af835.jpg

The issue seems to be that when the escape wheel sits as far into the main plate as it will go, the pinion meshes with both the third and the fourth wheel, causing a lockup. I've checked the escape wheel bearing jewels and they look spotless. The wheel itself also looks good in my opinion:

IMG_3175.thumb.jpg.8449e7fbee451947c152e8133e181dcc.jpg

My question is this: do you think my assessment is reasonable, and would the solution be to shift the bottom bearing jewel slightly up? I don't own a jeweling tool so I can't hope to fix this anytime soon, but I would like to know to (in theory) fix this 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Your theory sounds plausible. When the escape wheel is in its upwrd position it runs ok , yes    and in the lower position it catches the fourth wheel , Yes, then the only recourse is to move the lower jewel up  to limit the end shake . or try another escape wheel with a narrower pinion.  Is the escape wheel an original or a replacement. As you received it as a non there is always the possibillity that's the reason it did not work in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/10/2022 at 10:37 PM, watchweasol said:

Hi Your theory sounds plausible. When the escape wheel is in its upwrd position it runs ok , yes    and in the lower position it catches the fourth wheel , Yes, then the only recourse is to move the lower jewel up  to limit the end shake . or try another escape wheel with a narrower pinion.  Is the escape wheel an original or a replacement. As you received it as a non there is always the possibillity that's the reason it did not work in the first place.

Thanks watchweasol. I have no idea about the service history on this watch or if the escape wheel is original. Maybe I will be able to fix this one day, but that day is not today...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

Can you post a pic of the dial side? Your escape wheel has a conical pivot on the lower side, which means it should work with a cap jewel. If the cap jewel is missing, or if the wheel was replaced with one needing one, it would cause exactly the issue you are seeing.

Well spotted, the escape wheel did have a cap jewel which I had removed for cleaning and promptly forgot all about. I didn't know about conical pivots and that they are supposed to ride on the cap jewel! Of course, replacing the cap jewel solved the issue and the end shake is now much more reasonable. No more binding!

I feel like a fool now, but at least I learned something new 😄 I owe you a beer @nickelsilver!

IMG_3218.thumb.jpg.4c3b3bf93b400e91f85a7ff1f9f652d8.jpg

I'll update this thread if I manage to get this running again. Still not sure why it wasn't running before, though my bet now is simply because it was very dirty.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Update: It did run with eventually, but with very low amplitude. Then I noticed that the top escape wheel pivot was bent. I tried carefully bending it back and it snapped of course. Since I bought this for practice I'm not too bummed, though I'm not sure whether I bent the pivot or if it was bent from earlier. I'll inspect more carefully when disassembling in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Put the movement in a movement holder and it will be supported as you push down on the setting lever post to release the winding stem. Make sure the post is over the shoulder of the movement holder so what you are pressing down on is supported. As a general rule, hold the movement and not the movement holder. Replace the hands when the movement isn't in the case and support the centre jewel (if it has one) on a hard surface or staking block when replacing the hands to stop the jewel accidentally moving or even coming out. A dedicated movement holder with a central jewel support is even better, but pricey
    • It might help us if we knew which watch like model number.
    • Hi, guys I have a bit of a predicament and hopefully, somebody can advise. I'm working on a Roamer MST 521 where the movement is extracted from the crystal side. I'm now at the final hurdle where I need to replace the movement back into its case but I'm not sure of the correct procedure. I still need to fit the hands but that's where the problem lies. If I insert the winding stem to test the hands for correct alignment I will need to turn the movement over to release the stem again it's the spring-loaded type and needs a small bit of force to push down but with the hands fitted, I don't think I can do this on a cushion without causing some damage to the hands and that's the last thing I want to do, this watch has already been a love-hate relationship and I'm so close to boxing this one off which I'm counting as my first major project.  The other option is to case the movement then fit the hands and hope everything is okay. I've already broken the original winding stem but managed to find a replacement, the last one in stock, so I'm a bit reluctant to keep removing it. Any suggestions would be appreciated. 
    • I would go for the dearer spring. You won't need to remove the spring from the carrier ring and then use a mainspring winder to get it into the barrel, for a start. Also that spring is closer to the needed dimensions, especially the length. The length plays a part in the mainsprings strength. If you double the length you will half the force (strength) of the spring and vice-versa. A spring with 20 mm less length would be about 7% shorter, so technically would be 7% more strength, but I find halving this number is closer to real-world findings, so the spring would be about 3 to 4% more strength/force. On a mainspring that ideally kicks out 300 degrees of amplitude, a 3% increase in amplitude would be 309 degrees. Increasing or decreasing the length of the mainspring will affect the power reserve to a greater or lesser degree. It depends how much shorter or longer it is. I've attached a lesson regarding mainsprings, focussing on the size and strength of the spring within the barrel, you might find helpful. Unfortunately it is a PDF converted from a PowerPoint presentation, but only a slide was lost that was originally a video of fitting a mainspring   Lesson 5 The mainspring.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...