Jump to content

three letter code on balance cock


Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, robdavidson said:

so would it follow then that movements without a 3 letter code were probably not imported into the US by a manufacturer...

yes if you look at watches that were not imported into the US you will not see the codes

2 hours ago, dadistic said:

Best info I found was that the codes were required from approx. the mid '30's to the mid 60's

the time span of years that you have reminded me of something the missing piece to the story.

the years you have correspond to when tariffs existed to protect the American watch industry. To understand this am attaching a couple of PDFs the older one breaks things down with all sorts of interesting statistical data. So basically you have a tax on imported watches and every single enhancement improvements or anything increases the price. This was basically very good for the watch companies because it limits competition and very bad for the consumer because it makes watches expensive. Then in the 60s it was decided that this was no longer needed to protect what was left to the American watch industry and they were dropped.

ICP-Watches-Clocks-2012-Final.pdf pub169 Tariff Watch 196.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I remember correctly the reason the tariffs were first introduced in 1930 was because some watch companies were selling watches that claimed to have adjustments that were not in fact present and claiming more jewels than were present, for a price less than watches that did in fact have those adjustments and jewels. So consumers were being duped and getting less than what they paid for, which put the entire watch industry in a bad light.  The import duty made it non-financially viable to claim adjustments that were not in fact present.   So, in theory, the move was to protect the consumers trust in the watch industry, while also lining Uncle Sam's pocket with some sweet import duties. 

 

Google Books has a fascinating transcript of a 1955 congressional committee that was investigating how some watch companies were gaming the system to avoid paying the import duties, which the government claimed had cost them around $250 million b/w 1930 and 1955. Various heads of the American watch companies testified with some really interesting background on their company operations. JFK was one of those present during the testimony. If anyone is interested you can download a PDF here.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just a note for those who come searching for information on this topic in the future.  I did eventually find the Mark's video on how to replace these springs, as someone observed, he does in fact make the replacement look easy.  (It actually is relatively easy once you have the knack of it.) If you're enrolled in one of Mark's online courses, the demonstration of how to replace this spring is in the Bonus Videos section of his course site, and is called "C2B1 – Sea-Gull Style Shock Springs".
    • If the metal was twice as thick, it wouldn't snap so easily.  The thickness is governed by the space available so you can't use thicker metal.  If you glued two pieces together, the likelihood of snapping would be reduced.  That's my theory anyway, could be wrong. 
    • there are various approaches to learning watch repair. A lot of people want to jump right in and every single watches something to be repaired restored. But other times like this it's disposable it's here for you to learn and when you're through learning you throw it away. yes you definitely should try this you have a learning movement you need to learn and the best way to learn is by doing something.
    • Sorry, the friction will be so great that the wheel will barely turn, if the movement will start at all, the amplitude will be verry lo.
    • If I can’t re-pivot the wheel, the logical thing to do is to descend the pivot hole.  Plan is to either stick a suitably sized hole jewel (from a barrel bridge or something) or fashion a blob of epoxy on the underside of the escape wheel cock so the wheel sits on its one pivot on the base plate and the staff with the broken off pivot (which I’ll polish as best as I can) becomes the upper pivot. As long as it doesn’t foul the 4th wheel it should work? I know it’s a bodge job, and if this were a rare movement, or belonged to someone else I would not do this. I’m just interested to see if I can get the thing to run. 
×
×
  • Create New...