Jump to content

No long regulator arm?


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Charette said:

Hi all - just looking to confirm my thoughts here. It seems the version of the seagull st3621 I have purchased does not have a ‘long’ regulator arm, just short studs.

Can I please confirm that the regulator I have circled is, in fact, the time regulator?

C5CA4923-7934-476A-8D9C-AD0EDC1437EC.jpeg

As ifibrin has said this is the beat adjuster of the movement.  When they are shorter than the timing adjuster ie. The stud inside the diameter of the regulator pins then that would be an overcoil hs also know as Brequet developed by Abraham Brequet. Its a more accurate hs than the flat, less restricted in its movements. This is not the case here. Some studs are also fixed making beat adjustment much more difficult over an adjustable one. This fixed variation is common on older vintage watches. You have both  timing and beat adjustable arms here.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all. I saw another photo from a different movement that confused me. I cannot find this version of the ST3621 anywhere else than where I bought it (ebay) to save my life!

I thought I was buying the same one Mark used in one of his videos on making a watch from internet parts, but I see though it has similar finishing, there is a different bridge layout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Charette said:

Thanks all. I saw another photo from a different movement that confused me. I cannot find this version of the ST3621 anywhere else than where I bought it (ebay) to save my life!

I thought I was buying the same one Mark used in one of his videos on making a watch from internet parts, but I see though it has similar finishing, there is a different bridge layout.

You will still get use from it, as a beginner any movement you will learn from. Enjoy🙂

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Charette said:

ST3621

there is a problem and watch repair which is variations lots and lots of variations. For instance somebody was confused recently over a balance staff and there's 11 staffs for their particular watch. So your watch should be similar to what Mark has but it will probably be a variation because the Chinese like to have even more variations. The Swiss variations will happen because of an evolution the watch will upgrade over time. The Chinese just like to have lots of variations

one of the YouTube channels I watch in 3-D printers was getting upset over this because if he reviewed a printer and said it was good the printer we bought would probably be different. Even if the company itself tries really hard to make an identical product often times in the case of not watches components from other sources will be modified and changed

but you still have a watch the watch he can practice with it might not look like the one Marquez but it should be similar enough it should have all the same basic characteristics and you can have fun learning with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I missed this earlier. The dial isn't going into the holder, it should sit proud of it. This is what I am currently using which I print for each different movement.    
    • I didn't think pulling to set position would work harden the spring, in that position it is stressed where the arm starts. By work hardening i meant rapid polishing at that point, a bit like polishing a pivot work hardens as it compresses the steel. I doubt polishing by hand would achieve much in that respect though. Its finished, arm polished up mostly at the join to the bridge's main body. I'm ok with it, the screw holes aren't great as i had to open them up by redrilling and positioning it was difficult, I'm not much use with a loupe, opening up with a file might be a better option for me or i could just use the correct drill size 😅. And the detent is way too deep, i had to guess that with the stem release out of position and sat on top, but i only took one measure and went for it, no slowly slowly catch your monkey 😅. First go I'm happy , well sort of, it works and thats a big thing for me, next one will have a bit more finesse.  Anyone thats interested, after filing, i used a 2000 grade home made diamond  micro file and then 20 micron film, the film is much better than wet and dry, more stable to use and doesn't shed cheap grade grit everywhere , then auto polish on a sponge pad.
    • I'm assuming that every time you set the watch you are work hardening the detent spring, maximum hardening is  where it meets the plate due to maximum deflection.   That's why it snaps there.  The Young's modulus may be the same but after it's reached its maximum yeid strength it breaks.  My mechanic engineering is very rusty, correct me if I'm wrong. 
    • Ah ok yes that makes sense to polish it where the arm starts to form from the body of the bridge, i thought you meant the underneath of all the arm.
    • this is something I've never quite understood about the some of the Swiss companies. In 1957 Omega was using 9010 for the keyless parts with epilam. there's been a slow migration towards using heavier lubrication's but still typically oils and epilam to keep them in place. When it seems like 9504 works so much better.  
×
×
  • Create New...