Jump to content

Moebius 9415 on Timex pallet pins... Bad idea?


Recommended Posts

Assembling a Timex today, I used Moebius 9415 pallet jewel grease on the brass pallet pins. Why did I do that? I was reading something earlier this week that described the speed with which 9101 can flow away from an open surface like the pins and escape wheel and thought I'd give 9415 a try.

The movement is running, but taking longer than usual to get up to a healthy looking amplitude. It has stopped occasionally, especially if I install the minute wheel and cannon pinion with the extra drag they add. I have checked the end shake adjustment screw, tightened until the balance seizes then backed off until it's free.

This was a full disassembly service, and my first on a Timex automatic so there could be another issue still, but it was running when I started.

So about the 9415 - is it too heavy for the thin brass pallet? Is it entirely unsuitable? I do not wish to take this thing back apart but would dunk the whole works in Ronsonol and relube it if you think that's warranted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9415 is definitely to viscous for a balance wheel. I too find 9010 too light, so I mix 9010 with hp1300.

You don't have to dunk the whole movement in lighter fluid. Just remove the balance and clean off the grease with a brush soaked in lighter fluid. Unless you used 9415 everywhere else. 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9415 is perfectly fine for a pin lever escapement of any size. I would say it's the best escapement lubricant period; I use it on everything from tiny ladies movements* to platform escapements, nothing works better.

 

*On something ultra-microscopic like a LeCoultre 101 I do use the smallest amount imaginable of 9010, with pallets and escape wheel epilamed. But 9415 does work here- just with a bit of an amplitude drop. As usually do those movements for companies, and they "must" see 270+ amplitude, I use the 9010. My feeling is that long term the 9415 is still better. On reasonably sized movements (5x7"' and up haha) definitely 9415 is the best for performance and longevity.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

9415 is perfectly fine for a pin lever escapement of any size. I would say it's the best escapement lubricant period; I use it on everything from tiny ladies movements* to platform escapements, nothing works better.

Thanks very much for the info. The movement has continued running overnight, crown-down while it first only really ran dial-up. It's still very weak in vertical positions but that can probably be solved with an adjustment to the v-conic endshake/sideshake screw.

I do feel like I probably used way too much 9415 so I may still yet clean it off and redo it. It's early to know though. All of the 5 or 6 unjeweled Timex movements I've serviced so far have taken about 2 full days before they settle into a strong beat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Update: I let it run 48 hours and it is doing really well, strong in all positions with the dial and hands installed. So I don't know why this one took twice as long as any other I've worked on to distribute its oils and stabilize. I did not clean off the escapement and redo the lubrication.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mbwatch said:

Update: I let it run 48 hours and it is doing really well, strong in all positions with the dial and hands installed. So I don't know why this one took twice as long as any other I've worked on to distribute its oils and stabilize. I did not clean off the escapement and redo the lubrication.

Good to know this mb. My missus is doing a disney character, v conic when she gets her arse into gear. I shall make her aware of this. 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Success, and failure. Balance is back together. I need to adjust the position though as the roller jewel is way of. More than that though, rookie mistake. I set the hair spring between the pins, forgetting that to rotating pin is oval. So when I close it up the hair spring is in contact with the outer regulator pin. I assume that's bad. At rest, without the outer pin rotated closed, it sits like this Oh, and the pivots look like this. It's not a banana, it's just because of multiple lenses and trying to get a high mag photo Slightly wonky jewel   But, the free oscillation test, 180 degrees, USSR makes that 53 seconds    
    • Welcome the the forum. Are you talking about the part of the stem that fits to the crown? Photos would help.    
    • Thank you for the warm welcome. Cleaning stakes is probably 80% of what I do daily 😳. I had issues with severe flash rust with other things and I haven’t tried my ultrasonic cleaner with stakes yet. I probably will now just to see how it works out. I probably have 3-4 thousand stakes at the moment and was looking for a way to clean/polish large amounts at one time. I started out using Evap O Rust soaks, which worked but still required hand polishing and severe flash rust usually happened fast.    I found a website that polishes jewelry in a vibratory type polisher so I picked up a large one to try out. (Eventually got a smaller one also).  I started out with a ceramic type media, It did a great job, but I still had to hand polish each and every one and it left them like a muddy mess and clogged the ends easily.    I then found out the big companies that specialize in polishing small pieces used a stainless steel media to clean and polish at the same time. Evidently using this method somehow burnished the stakes and prevented them from rusting easily. To get an even nicer finish they used a wet polish method and that has been the key to getting my best finish with large amounts of stakes. It just basically removes any rust and corrosion and leaves a very nice finish. I can’t measure any loss of material with a micrometer or a digital dial caliper. Some of these stakes are from the early 1900’s and are not as durable as the newer stakes, so it varies some. I have piles of damaged stakes that won’t make the cut but I’m saving in case I ever get a lathe 😂.     I did notice that sometimes the holes were clogged up and still needed to clean them manually. I wonder if the Ultrasonic process would fix that ?    Before I ship a set I still manually go through each and every stake but sometimes I slip up and miss one or two. My processes are getting better and I’m getting more organized as I go. Thanks for sharing your process. I have some Boley stuff also that I am hoping to finish up one day.
    • In the process of laser engraving the plate, it is crucial to set the correct engraving depth. If the depth is too deep, it may result in a murky pad printing effect, while if it is too shallow, the lines may become disconnected, leading to broken lines. On flat dials without texture, using a harder silicone pad for pad printing will yield better results. The hardness of the silicone pad directly affects the thickness of the lines, and adjusting the hardness appropriately is key to achieving precise printing. Additionally, the ink ratio is another critical factor in successful pad printing. Adding too much thinner will cause the lines to become unclear, while too little thinner may cause the ink to cure too quickly, resulting in broken lines during printing. In summary, laser engraving, silicone pad hardness, and ink ratio are all interrelated, and each step can affect the final result. These steps require extensive practice and experimentation to find the most suitable formula. I hope these insights can provide some useful reference and help!
    • Welcome to the forum, Rick! Cool story! Always appreciate if people take a little more time to introduce themselves. Coincidentally, I spent a few hours this weeks cleaning out the insides of all my staking set punches (a German Boley set) and cleaning everything in the ultrasonic. Not really a restoration, but loved the feeling of seeing the set in full shine again and knowing that I can use it without worrying about clogged punches. There's often threads where members look for buying advice for their first staking sets. Your inputs will certainly be appreciated.  
×
×
  • Create New...