Jump to content

Replacement Ronda balance staff issues


Recommended Posts

Hi, I have replaced the balance staff on a Seiko 5606. Old staff had lots of end shake and both pivots were ground flat. The new Ronda staff is much better with just the right end shake but I see differing amplitude (20 Deg difference) and rate dial up/ down (11 SPD difference). I investigated the pivots and found one of them that is pretty much flat while the other is slightly rounded. Is this to be expected on a new staff? I would have thought they would be shaped and polished out of the packet. All help appreciated, Steve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not unusual especially with vintage movements. Generally, the watch repairer will want to draw the amplitude to be as close as possible to the side positions (PF, PU etc) and vice versa. So if amplitude is too great then it can be reduced by flattening the pivots and if it's low then it may benefit from being rounded off more.

Of course, this is not the only factor governing amplitude and rate but it is one to take into consideration as many vintage watches were timed by hand by a technician when first manufactured resulting in no two watch movements being identical - try swapping the balance assembly between two identical Smiths movements for example - I would be surprised if there wasn't a noticeable difference.

Therefore - more work can be involved when fitting balance staffs to vintage watch movements and timing it to a reasonable standard - sometimes lots of pushing, pulling and tweaking until you get a good result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mark said:

This is not unusual especially with vintage movements. Generally, the watch repairer will want to draw the amplitude to be as close as possible to the side positions (PF, PU etc) and vice versa. So if amplitude is too great then it can be reduced by flattening the pivots and if it's low then it may benefit from being rounded off more.

Of course, this is not the only factor governing amplitude and rate but it is one to take into consideration as many vintage watches were timed by hand by a technician when first manufactured resulting in no two watch movements being identical - try swapping the balance assembly between two identical Smiths movements for example - I would be surprised if there wasn't a noticeable difference.

Therefore - more work can be involved when fitting balance staffs to vintage watch movements and timing it to a reasonable standard - sometimes lots of pushing, pulling and tweaking until you get a good result.

Thanks Mark, I appreciate your input. I have ordered a Bergeon pivot rounding tool as I do not have any Jacot or lathe (or the skill to use either). I will report back with pictures of the rounded pivot and hopefully some amplitude gain. Steve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In repairing a generic Swiss cylinder quarter repeater pocket watch with no repeat mainspring I'm trying to work out how to determine the size of a suitable spring.  Barrel ID 7.6mm, Arbor 2.77mm height around 1.45mm. Clearly only one turn is used plus setup, but the only actual figure I can find in Saunier who says in the previous half century 3.5 turns was considered good (and Saunier is about 1880).  Calculating off that would suggest about a 0.15mm thick spring 128mm long. That feels intuitively a little thick, but I don't have another repeater conveniently to hand to check so any pointers welcome.  Photo shows the repeat train assembled without the bridge since that hides everything.   Alan  
    • To identify movements the standard practice is the actual diameter of the movement, and a front on image of both the movement side and the dial side- minus the dial. The setting mechanism (under the dial) is considered the "fingerprint" of the movement and 9/10 leads to full identification.
    • What of? The wheel itself (standard lever escapement) or the plate with no numbers on it? Does that help, from the ebay listing?
    • Thanks. I did make a self introduction— perhaps in the wrong place? 🤔😢In any I am an Australian 🇦🇺 American living in the beautiful Gold Coast, Queensland Australia. I love Grand Seiko and Seiko watches, and recently came back from the Grand Seiko Shizukuishi Studio in northern Japan where I was blown away by the design artistry and technical excellence. More later on that (including photos, if interested!)
    • Bbefixer. I had the same type of problem when I first joined the forum. A pocket watch movement with no markings. Photographs of the the movement, and the members came to the rescue. Within days I had a number of suggestions. Found the details and information of the movement on ranfft. Never managed to get a donor, but at least I know what I need.  The members are really knowledgeable.
×
×
  • Create New...