Jump to content

Movement holders?


BillM

Recommended Posts

I have several of these plastic movement holders and it seems like there’s never a good fit on any movement I use with them. 
This Seiko 6309 is barley held in place, when I install screws I find the movement popping out of place sometimes. 
what do you guys use? 

0EB499F7-721B-4CDB-8A46-3B79EF07A03E.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, spectre6000 said:

Bergeon 4040.

Agreed, a solid tool.  I bought a cheep no-name holder from eBay with free returns.  It was supposed to be a spare holder.  I returned it because it was so poorly machined that only three corners would support the movement from underneath, hold the movement about it's periphery or touch the table at any one time.  The adjustment screw wobbled wich meant the offending corner changed from time to time and ruled out my interest in making any improvements to it.

But a quality tool, you will be better off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The P (plastic) versions don’t do as good a job as the metal versions, as they’re softer and don’t grip the movements as well. I suspect the plastic versions exist for fear of making markings on movements when using the steel ones, but I’ve not seen any damage caused by them - even when clamping them pretty tight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you should own an 3D printer you can create perfect fitting holders custom made for each of the movements you work on.

AACEA999-7FF4-4B44-9E81-FD71911D8EA3.thumb.jpeg.a1745a35ec78aba5970559b4f415f36f.jpeg 

4 hours ago, BillM said:

… when I install screws I find the movement popping out of place sometimes….

With vice type holders thats my experience too.

Edited by Kalanag
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mostly use the 4040 or it's little brother 4039, but I also have some that are phenolic fiber in those sizes and really like them too. For "flippy" movements like chronographs  a round full contact holder is best. The round bergeon can be had in any size and adapted, but I often turn them up from Delrin (I make it for a light friction fit) or brass or aluminum which I split and use a screw to tighten. The movement can be fit dial up or down.

 

In the pic bottom left is a commercial chrono holder, the other bottom ones are shop made. Above is one of the phenolic holders and a couple more Delrin shop made and a few of the round metal Bergeons.

20220729_101207.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

 For "flippy" movements like chronographs  a round full contact holder is best. The round bergeon can be had in any size and adapted, but I often turn them up from Delrin (I make it for a light friction fit) or brass or aluminum which I split and use a screw to tighten. The movement can be fit dial up or down.

"Flippy" is a good description. I had a Valjoux chrono flip out several times whilst testing the buttons. It just wouldn't sit properly in the 4040. I've ordered some cheap plastic holders. I'm hoping a bit of cutting/filing and they will be better for such movements.

image.thumb.png.2d37d398d16c35a480754ac8492c2a41.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great info here, thanks everyone. 
looks like I’ll Be making some round holders soon. 

nickelsliver,  do you machine the metals ones just under size and then use a cam screw to expand the opening to fit the movement? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One can never have too many dedicated size/shape movement holders. I like the Marshall (I think HR made them as well.) 4-sided vise style a lot for small movements, but it sometimes doesn't grip them right. Heck, even the Bergeon holder made for 6 3/4 x 8 ligne movements isn't perfect when trying to hold the movement dial down. Dial up it's great. But it's always nice to have one specifically designed to accommodate a particular movement. I'm always on the lookout for an interesting movement holder that looks like it will work well. 

The Bergeon 4040 looks like a good one, and is truly ubiquitous, but is one I don't have. Good luck.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, here’s my first custom movement holder, pretty happy with it, in fact I wish I would have made this before I started on this movement, I’ll almost done with it. 
 

I ordered the 4040 anyway, but figured I try making one in the mean time.  
thanks for all the help guys!
 

9DF1E4E5-D2E5-42A6-AD9D-070093CE3492.jpeg

64B72DA8-7B75-4210-895D-B1577BF5DD25.jpeg

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Nice design. An inner and outer lip to accommodate both the bare movement and the movement+spacer ring.

Most of the available dedicated Seiko 7s26+ holders require the dial holder spacer to be in place.

One exception is the holder by Murphy Manufacturing. It has an inner ring that supports the bare plate and an outer sleeve that can be raised to hold the spacer ring. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/29/2022 at 2:59 AM, BillM said:

I have several of these plastic movement holders and it seems like there’s never a good fit on any movement I use with them. 
This Seiko 6309 is barley held in place, when I install screws I find the movement popping out of place sometimes. 
what do you guys use? 

0EB499F7-721B-4CDB-8A46-3B79EF07A03E.jpeg

Similar to the cheap Chinese ones. A lot of it has to do with the shape of movement plate. Bevels on the mainplate can cause uneveness on the jaws of the cheap holders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that you need to watch while placing the movement into the holder is what the holder is going to clamp on. In your very first photo it looks like you'd need to rotate the movement so the points where it engages are located on portions of the circumference where there is a solid section (rather than at a point where there is a cut out.

The 4040 has several ways that a movement can be placed and you have to ensure that you have the movement flat and lined up on both sides. You can also flip the 4040 over and use the different configuration on the bottom (or top).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/6/2022 at 3:10 AM, grsnovi said:

One thing that you need to watch while placing the movement into the holder is what the holder is going to clamp on. In your very first photo it looks like you'd need to rotate the movement so the points where it engages are located on portions of the circumference where there is a solid section (rather than at a point where there is a cut out.

The 4040 has several ways that a movement can be placed and you have to ensure that you have the movement flat and lined up on both sides. You can also flip the 4040 over and use the different configuration on the bottom (or top).

Good point G, this is very common. Points of contact can low on cheap movement holders even on bergeon 4040 depending on the shape and layout of the movement. The cheap ones do not have enough depth on the jaws where the size increased are. I prefer the ones that have a wooden grip on each corner. Here are a couple of pocket watch and larger watch size holders and also a jewelers vice with a little hack to create the same idea. Also a circular full grip holder, here the curved jaws are undercut to help grip over a movement lip, also has a nice stable base that doesnt decrease when mounting smaller movements like the bergeon 4040 does.  I mostly use my adapted one as it gives me a nice table to put small parts on when working and the base is permanently sized and stable also. It has a good weight to it unlike other holders that knock about easily, you know its there so to speak. And then the fixed ones that seem far too light for me.

16625386288352696275268388711239.jpg

16625387042604815585657156050487.jpg

1662538757877282388275414005167.jpg

16625388364338617375805324268856.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you so much, Hector and CJ. I appreciate the tech sheet and the video. Gasp, I think I will make the attempt. What's the worst that can happen? I think there may be a new balance complete in my future, though.  I'll update the post and let you know the result. R, Frank  
    • So here is the new base (v 2.1), I made it so that the base will fit over and swallow the stump of the hand pusher tool (or at least my clone of the tool), I also reduced the OD of the bottom skirt a little as it looked/felt a little large, here are a few pictures and the fake .pdf file which you need to convert to .zip once downloaded.   The cut-out seen on the below image on the bottom of the base should swallow the OD (40 mm, +0.1 mm tolerance) of the stump and the height of the stump 9.5mm (measured to 9.1mm, but rounded to 9.5mm) - let me know if this works for your tool.   Note, I think you may need to print supports for the new internal shelf created? Here is the fake .pdf for just the FreeCAD base file and 3mf files Modular Movement Holder.pdf Here is the fake pdf for complete set of the new base and ring FreeCAD/3mf files: Modular Movement Holder base and ring v 2.1.pdf However, I'm wondering how often you could use this feature, adding the dial usually increases the OD of the movement, so you would need a new (larger) adapter ring tuned to the OD of the dial and I wouldn't like to grip the dial in any kind of movement holder if It could be avoided for fear of damaging it. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?
    • Hi Frank, you have dived headlong into the deep end. Hairspring work has to be the scariest thing a newbie has to tackle. Your hairspring appears to be bent and just putting it back into the regulator would not allow the balance to work properly. It might start oscillating but the performance would not be good. The proper thing to do is to unstud the hairspring, remove the hairspring from the balance, reinstall the hairspring on the stud carrier, reshape the endcurve and centre the collet to the balance jewel hole. This challenge would either make you or break you. Hope that you will be able to fix your watch. Welcome to the world of watchmaking.  Watch this video. It think it'll give you an idea of the task ahead. From your 1st photo, I think you have a etachron type stud. Let me see if I can find a video on how to remove it from the arm.
    • Have read of the Tech Sheet attached on the balance section page 12. It may be bent but until you reposition it back in the regulator pins you'll never know. Cheers CJ 4R35B_4R36A.pdf
    • Aloha All, My Seiko 4R35B movement stopped working today. Upon closer inspection, it looks like the balance spring came out of the regulator pin. This is my first time working on a balance. Any advice on how to get this spring repositioned (back to normal)? I'm pretty sure that while adjusting the beat error on this movement, I must have turned the stud (I didn't even know they turned), and the spring eventually fell out.  Will the spring go back to even spacing when it's back in the pin, or does it look bent? Thanks, Frank  
×
×
  • Create New...