Jump to content

Glue TV style acrylic crystal into case?


Recommended Posts

I'm in the late stages of fixing up this TV cased Timex. It has a conventionally circular acrylic crystal, but ground or molded to the TV shape in the center. Luckily it responded well enough to polishing that I don't need to replace it. But this watch came into my possession assembled with the crystal loosely placed into the case, with a thin gasket between its circular flange and the case interior. When the movement is installed, the dial's outer edge presses the crystal slightly into the gasket, but not enough to seal at all. The crystal does not snap into place or fit under any friction; it falls right out when the movement comes out. I assume it's the original, if only because its implausible someone would've ever replaced a weirdo crystal on this $25 watch.

Do you think I should just glue this crystal in with hypo cement? Or maybe try a thicker gasket to put more pressure against it? It only has a snap-on caseback. Sandwiching it in loosely with the gasket doesn't seem like the right solution. Any water resistance at all is a secondary goal to a watch that doesn't fall to pieces when the caseback comes off. And it's staying in my own collection.

PXL_20220723_215941674.thumb.jpg.0e25421a98b81808fbd2e23a455e7b64.jpgPXL_20220723_220002206.thumb.jpg.715ea2ce19cbe07dab7894efecb1a3cf.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Hi Under the circumstances and the fact its stopping in your collection so un likley to receive any hard knocks  use the Cement or a UV curing adheisive.

Thank you, I'll glue it in. Out of curiosity though, you mentioned hard knocks; would the gasket provide some shock resistance I'm not considering? Or do you mean "hard knocks" in the figurative sense, like it will be generally abused in ways I can't predict, submerged in water, etc?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, watchweasol said:

hard knocks

I would imagine you, knowing what it took to fix your watch, would be more protective of it.  You value the time and effort it took and most others would not (present community excepted).

I'd like to see it all together when it's done.

Shane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard knocks in the figurative sense, in as much as below. Its hopefully not going to live the life a lot of the Timex brand did in the early days, Being a mans working watch.

1 hour ago, Shane said:

I would imagine you, knowing what it took to fix your watch, would be more protective of it

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I came across another example of this Timex model and bought it for a bit more than the first one cost, but it was more complete. Though they're both 1978, the second one's crystal is different. It's much flatter, not domed, and is snapped tightly into the case with the O-ring. This suggests the first watch's crystal isn't the original after all.

I prefer the look & character of the domed one to the flatter one, but may yet switch it out on the one I keep if I can't get it solidly attached (Hypo cement isn't holding well)

Aside: The second specimen's hands were also original and undamaged, and they are not the same as in the catalog photo discussed in my other post. As pictured in the catalog, the hour hand can't clear the 12:00 index without either a taller cannon pinion or contorting all 3 hands way out of shape to make it work. The actual 1978 watch's hour hand is shorter, and doesn't have to pass over the 12 index.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
On 7/24/2022 at 7:40 AM, Shane said:

I'd like to see it all together when it's done

This piece has been floating in and out of my job queue since summer but it's finally all done. I had a second specimen and after chatting with someone I sold a different Timex to, it turns out he was in search of this exact model. I then found a third with an unsalvageable crystal but perfect dial to swap for my own bad dial. So between mine and the one for the other guy I've got 2 in great condition now.

I put mine on a blue faux crocodile strap.

 

PXL_20221111_230210152.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Yes, it does look good.

From time to time, I have seen other TV watches and have passed on them all.   They always reminded me of the 70s, specifically parts I didn't like.  Since your original posting (I can't say why) they now remind of several aspects which I did.

Thanks.

Nice job.

Shane 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Welcome my friend. 
    • Been there. Worn that Tshirt.  'ping'. Hands and knees. Nothing. Nada. 20 minutes? Ha! I found it 7 month later. How? Well, after advice from a member, I invested in a £4 UV light torch.  Hands and knees looking for a 'ping' from a Sekonda, found them both within 30 seconds. UV makes the jewel shine. easy peasy. Could have taken longer. Just lucky on the location of the search. Hope this helps.
    • Thanks Dell. I thought about silver soldering. Have never done it but would like to give it a go. Do you think to put flux on the butted joint then run the solder in or to maybe brace it with a piece of scrap spring steel?
    • Never and others. Yes, like you I do spend a fair amount of time reading the contents of this forum. I find it better that any other. Clear, lucid, no Prima Donas, and most of all an easy access without adverts. All thanks to Mark. God bless you mate. You give so much to many of us. What if? No Mark? Hypothetically. A forum. I did run a forum for a few years. Really enjoyed it, but became so engrossed that it did affect my health. I gave to to others to run. Not been back. It was very successful and rivalled a number of large paying sites. No adverts, no others but me. I did ask and listen to members comments and it worked well.    Costs Having a domain name, £10 annually.  Register the site with a forum company, free. Build the site using the forum company guide lines, free. It looked and ran almost the same a Mark's. All the same facilities. The cost was only £5 per month, but counted visits (views). If I recall, it was that price for 5,000 views. Each extra 5,000 views increased the price by £2 per month. Success was my own personal undoing. From £5 per month initially, it rose to £60 a month and looked like increasing. This was 10 years ago. I could not afford that, and asked it anyone would like to take over and someone did. I would assume that this is the price that Mark is funding for us all. His return is our continued comments on the internet about his course, and the fact that many of the big names on YouTube mention him as their Tutor. Those of us who have done, and are still using, his course, benefit. In comparison to other courses, I can't believe how cheap it is, and the value is exceptional. It is the structure that gives the value. Long may Mark reign. Ross  
    • Hi all, total newbie to watchmaking and I've had a bit of a mishap. Just completing level 2 and was doing ok, but I was just on the last part of the reassembly of my ST3620 when the balance end stone shot across the room, just as I was trying to see if I had put the correct amount of oil between it and the balance end, aarrrgh! Been on my hands and knees combing the carpet for 20mins looking for it but to no avail. Does anybody know where I can get a replacement from and what to look for please?? Thanks.
×
×
  • Create New...