Jump to content

Seiko 7006 post for reduction wheel with a groove?


Recommended Posts

I’ve inspected the movement (Seiko 7006) and found that the post for the reduction wheel, the one with teeth for the pawl leaver has a machined groove in it.
I don’t quite understand the reason behind it and therefore unsure what to lubricate it with. The reduction wheel itself has some grey inside it so I’m guessing it was lubricated with the S4 graphite grease.
Does anyone know the reason why Seiko machined a groove in the post?

 

Groove.jpg

ReductionWheel.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PeterS said:

I don’t quite understand the reason behind it and therefore unsure what to lubricate it with. 

The reduction wheel moves slowly and it is not under much pressure, so whatever thick oil (graphite or not) will work fine. 

Some minor design details like this are not very important. You can find that the same manufacturer changes them in between versions or generations and even give different oiling instruction in their various service sheets.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, jdm said:

The reduction wheel moves slowly and it is not under much pressure, so whatever thick oil (graphite or not) will work fine.

That’s what I thought, the S4, 9501, D5, anything like that should be fine.
It just puzzles me why they machined the groove there. It’s extra cost to the manufacturing so they must have had a good reason for it.
I was thinking whether it’s there as an ‘oil groove’, like an oil sink but that doesn’t make much sense. If not oiled properly and too much D5, or any other suitable oil ends up in the groove, that could potentially leak out and spread where it shouldn’t be. Putting grease in it, that wouldn’t go anywhere so it wouldn’t serve much purpose either.
Perhaps to reduce the friction? I really don’t know, I can’t think of anything rational.
I suppose it’s not that important, it will work just fine if I put some grease on it but if anyone knows the reason behind it, do let me know.

Edited by PeterS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello everybody, sorry for the late reply. Thank you all so much for your help and your tips. I got lucky and found a replacement wheel bridge for cheap which actually ended up being in decent condition. I decided not to do anything about the mainspring barrel pivot since I didn't have the right tools and the barrel didn't have much endshake anyhow. I am happy to report that the watch now runs great, I have regulated it to about +-10/s day which is fine by my standards. The timegrapher result looks decent as well, although beat error is around 0.6ms which could be better I suppose. Amplitude reaches over 230 quite consistently which I'm happy with also. My lighter fluid has also been replaced by balance spring cleaning solution and now the springs don't stick to themselves anymore - who would have thought. I'm super happy with this watch, it might not be worth a whole lot but it's awesome that I could restore it and it makes me wear it with pride. To me it's a genuinely good lucking watch, it'll be my daily driver for a while. Thanks again to everybody for their input! I couldn't have done the repair without your help.   Here are some images for those interested, the bracelet isn't original but I don't really mind:    
    • Balance-hairspring system is oscillator with big Q-factor. When all in the movement is OK, the rate (frequency) is verry close to the own resonant frequency of the balance-hairspring. But in some cases, the movement (with foult) will force the resonator to work on pritty different frequency, sometimes faster, and sometimes slower. When this happens, the amplitude is always weak. So, the first thing to ask is what is the amplitude. If it is more than 180 and the hairspring doesn't touch itself and anything else, then for sure it is 'short'. If the amplitude is weak, then the first thing to do is to understand why and rectify the problem. At this time no point to check timekeeping. But, if one doubts that the hairspring is not correct, then He needs to calcullate the rate of the movement, then to 'vibrate' the balance-hairspring out of the movement and to measure the free oscillations frequency (period) with timer in order to ensure that they comply with the rate. If we have pictures, then it will be easier to tell something about that wheel.
    • So much work has gone into this! Thanks again @Jon. I will go back and check my adjustments from last weekend. A few questions for you, if you don't mind. In the reset position, I can understand the problem if the gap between the hammer and the minute counter heart is too big (slide 77) but what is bad about both hammers being in contact with the cams (slide 76)? I read somewhere that Landeron recommended grease on the runner cam, but the minute counter heart should be dry. Is that so, and why? How many tads in a ligne?
    • Could you glue two pieces together for rigidity and separate after forming? 
×
×
  • Create New...