Jump to content

How do you instinctively know if a pivot has too much sideshake or endshake?


Recommended Posts

A lot of the advice around the forum when diagnosing low amplitude is to check the sideshake and endshake and re-bush or jewel as necessary.  I learned from the previous topic I made that sideshake should be around 0.02mm for the gear train.  And while I know this number, I do not know how that correlates to the real world.  I obviously can't stick a caliper or micrometer into the pivot hole, so that means I'll have to know what it is by feel and by appearance, but this I am not sure of.  Can someone give some insight on how to do this?

Another practical question is that if a pivot hole is worn to the point where its oblong and needs to be staked and broached, where in the hole do you do that? Even if you manage to close the hole up enough, you'd have to ream/broach exactly over the center of the original hole, not the center of the new smaller hole, since the center of the new hole is still not where the original center was.  Kind of hard to describe this without pictures, so let me know if you need clarification.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, GregG said:

Can someone give some insight on how to do this?

There is a rule of thumb for this which is that with everything dismantled, stand the wheel in question upright in it's pivot hole and observe how far it is able to lean from the vertical. Ideally you are looking for about 5 degrees of lean.

Now although you can't put a protractor into the system to measure this, you can draw two lines on a piece of paper that intersect at 5 degrees to give yourself a bench mark with which to compare. Believe it or not the human eye is usually pretty good at comparing angles.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its like you say a feel. This guy shows the end shake on an escape wheel. I call this amount excessive. The reason is;    you want pallets interface level with escape teeth/ wheel and the shown amount of end shake when combined/ added to end shake on fork arbour might not give you the level interface you desire. 

For side shake, I grab the arbour in tweezers and feel the side shake. You will get the " feel"  by experience, you can also observe the pivot's shake in the hole under high magnification. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Its like you say a feel. This guy shows the end shake on an escape wheel. I call this amount excessive. The reason is;    you want pallets interface level with escape teeth/ wheel and the shown amount of end shake when combined/ added to end shake on fork arbour might not give you the level interface you desire. 

For side shake, I grab the arbour in tweezers and feel the side shake. You will get the " feel"  by experience, you can also observe the pivot's shake in the hole under high magnification. 

 

Thanks joe, but how do I correlate a feel with too much or too little sideshake?  If I have one pivot that shakes x amount, and another pivot that shakes a tiny bit more, how do I know if the first is good and second is bad, or if both are good, or if both are bad?

With endshake, I can imagine it would be easier to determine.  If the teeth of one gear interact with the teeth of another gear, you would not want the endshakes to be so loose as to possible cause those two to loose their meshing, correct?  Or in the case of the video, ideally the escape teeth and the pallet jewels would be at the same level.  But if the endshakes are too loose, theoretically the jewels might just barely be catching on the escape teeth.

Edited by GregG
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • this is something I've never quite understood about the some of the Swiss companies. In 1957 Omega was using 9010 for the keyless parts with epilam. there's been a slow migration towards using heavier lubrication's but still typically oils and epilam to keep them in place. When it seems like 9504 works so much better.  
    • OK, welcome in the world of alarm clocks... I guess the 4th wheel is dished because it is from another movement. If it was not dishet, then it would not mesh with the pinion of the escape wheel, am I right? The marks of wear on the 4th wheel pinion doesn't corespond to the 3th wheel table position, at list this is what i see on the picts. Calculating the rate is easy - there is a formula - BR = T2 x T3 x T4 x T5 x 2 /(P3 x P4 x P5) where T2 - T5 are the counts of the teeth of the wheels tables, and P3 - P5 are the counts of the pinion leaves. Vibrating the balance is easy - grasp for the hairspring where it should stay in the regulator with tweasers, let the balance hang on the hairspring while the downside staff tip rests on glass surface. Then make the balance oscillate and use timer to measure the time for let say 50 oscillations, or count the oscillations for let say 30 seconds. You must do the free oscillations test to check the balance staff tips and the cone cup bearings for wear. This kind of staffs wear and need resharpening to restore the normal function of the balance.
    • Glue a nut to the barrel lid, insert a bolt, pull, disolve the glue.  Maybe someone will have a better answer. 
    • The stress is the force (on the spring) x distance. The maximum stress is at the bottom, and decreases up the arm. That's why they always break at the bottom. I used a round file, then something like 2000 grit to finish. I gave the rest of the arm a quick polish - no need for a perfect finish. Just make sure there are no 'notches' left from cutting/filing. The notches act like the perforations in your toilet paper 🤣
    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
×
×
  • Create New...