Jump to content

Recommended Posts

20220624_142657.thumb.jpg.c8f45b8bd239c9d5e62af841bbba819e.jpg

I just got this watch in the mail today. It's a Rado Emperor. I've never heard of a Rado Emperor before. The seller listed it as a 20 jewel, running watch which cannot wind or adjust time.

That intrigued me. The photo looked like a 2824/2836, but I've never seen a 20 jewel version. So I bidded for it and won at USD $51.

20220624_143239.thumb.jpg.3971e14f822fcb47f47e16ca83b82673.jpg

The movement inside turned out to be a 2836-1. My initial diagnosis was the infamous keyless works but it turn out to be something even simpler.... a broken winding stem.

20220624_221142.thumb.jpg.f8e71912cca7619a4c5cd317e551764a.jpg

The watch case is rather corroded. I was thinking of re-casing it in an after market China made case. Something like this...

SG$ 46.82  35%OFF | LARIMOKER 40mm Solid border Explorer 2 Look Watch Case sapphire glass fit NH35  ETA2824 2836 Miyota8205 8215 PT5000 DG2813 3804

Does anyone have experience with China made watch cases? Will the 2836 fit easily or will it require major rework?

TIA

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

Does anyone have experience with China made watch cases? Will the 2836 fit easily or will it require major rework?

I've used some Chinese cases and it varies. Some are brilliant, some are ok. But none of them that I tried were worse than what you've got now so it's certainly worth it to try. The ones I tried were for NH35 movements and fitment was ok, I haven't tried the 2836 types.

Edited by gbyleveldt
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have recent experience with this.  Get a case for the DG or Miyota movement.  The stem height between the 2824 and 2836 is different.  I don't have the chart with stem heights handy but they are different.  The Chinese sellers are not always correct with their descriptions.  I guess that happens when you sell everything from watch parts to woman's apparel in your store.   The DG/Miyota stem height and the 2836 stem height are the same. 

I tried to put a 2824 in a case that had a Miyota 8215.  It didn't work.  The dial was a mm or so off the case when I inserted the stem.  I got a 2836 clone and everything lined up correctly. 

The Seiko NH3x and 2824 stem heights are so close it usually works.  My inspiration to pursue this was the various Aliexpress watches that come with either movement.  I found a movement ring on Ali that had the NH outer diameter and the 2824 inner diameter.  I found that I needed a wavy spring to make up the height difference.  Also found on Ali.  A large o-ring kept the movement in place until the wavy spring arrived.  I mention this because some cases are listed as Miyota/2824.  In my experience this is not correct.  NH/2824 (with different casing parts) is more correct. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, bklake said:

I have recent experience with this.  Get a case for the DG or Miyota movement.  The stem height between the 2824 and 2836 is different.  I don't have the chart with stem heights handy but they are different.  The Chinese sellers are not always correct with their descriptions.  I guess that happens when you sell everything from watch parts to woman's apparel in your store.   The DG/Miyota stem height and the 2836 stem height are the same. 

I tried to put a 2824 in a case that had a Miyota 8215.  It didn't work.  The dial was a mm or so off the case when I inserted the stem.  I got a 2836 clone and everything lined up correctly. 

The Seiko NH3x and 2824 stem heights are so close it usually works.  My inspiration to pursue this was the various Aliexpress watches that come with either movement.  I found a movement ring on Ali that had the NH outer diameter and the 2824 inner diameter.  I found that I needed a wavy spring to make up the height difference.  Also found on Ali.  A large o-ring kept the movement in place until the wavy spring arrived.  I mention this because some cases are listed as Miyota/2824.  In my experience this is not correct.  NH/2824 (with different casing parts) is more correct. 

Thanks @bklake, I'll order the case for a Miyota 8215 and get some metal and plastic movement rings from Cousins. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Cousins has the movement ring.  I never saw it there.  The ring has the outer diameter of an NH35/36 including the plastic movement ring that is almost universally installed on them and the inner diameter of an ETA 28xx movement.  I got them in brass and plastic. 

I will look up my previous orders and link them  but I'm on vacation now.  Please give me some time.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used the case ring that was in the old watch for the switch from Miyota to 2836 clone.  You should have all the parts there to swap that movement into a case designed for the Miyota or DG movement.  Your Rado movement will not fit a case designed for the 2824.  Beware of cases that say they are for the Miyota/2824 movement.  Those two are not the same. 

The case rings and springs were for a 2824 I put in a case that was designed for the NH movement.  I also put a Ronda 515 movement in a case designed for an NH movement.  The Ronda shares sizes and stem height with the 2824. 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

20220711_111744.thumb.jpg.1b827439a657058db2d2cb3a5581b062.jpg

I just finished casing up the movement into the new case last night. The case came with a plastic movement ring, so I used that.

Much nicer than than Rado voyager and diastar style cases reminiscent of the old 70s Tressa. I think there is a company link between the two actually. This reminds me of my little quartz Tissot. 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, bklake said:

Looks nice and better protected.  Was I correct about which case?  Just want to know so I can revise my notes if I need to. 

SG$ 48.24  32%OFF | Miuksi 36mm/ 39mm stainless steel polished case sapphire glass fit NH35 NH36 ETA2824 2836 Miyota 8205 8215 DG2813 3804 movement
https://a.aliexpress.com/_mqLGclC

I got the 36mm case for the Miyota 8215.

The case is quite well finished. My only complain is that the spring in the screw down crown is really stiff. It hurts the fingers when pushing it back in and trying to screw it back in without cross threading the pendant tube.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

My only complain is that the spring in the screw down crown is really stiff.

Check the thread profile at the crest. It might benefit of careful smoothing with a fine file. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, bklake said:

You may need to shorten the stem a tiny bit more.  The distance from the crown threads and tube threads may be too long.  The spring may be almost completely compressed by the time you get to engagement.

There is only about 0.1mm freeplay when I unscrew the crown,, so shortening the stem is out of the question. The spring is just too stiff.

I will probably get a new crown from Cousins or just develop calluses on my fingers. 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
    • @JohnR725 now that you've mentioned it. This is actually the second aftermarket spring (same place and brand) I ordered as the first one broke. The eye on which the arbor pulls on, broke off on the first spring after the first wind, and also it was a bit to large for the arbor. Looked like on one the second picture in the 2nd group. The second one was exactly the same, I had to bend it a bit, to give it a more prominent curve to the end of the spring so that the arbor catches the eye.  Also I believe both were 5-10mm shorter. Not that I writing that, I feel a bit dumb, as the spring might actually been the problem all along, although its advertised as a substitute to the original...     
    • The CS70 is the only one they show as annealed.  A further search on ebay, I found CS75 and CS100 annealed carbon steel strips  e.g. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/314072784422
×
×
  • Create New...