Jump to content

ETA 555.232 documentation


Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I am working on a tag cal 165 chronograph. And it has the module 555.232 attached to it.

My module is missing the cannon pinion and the gears that that interface with the chronograph. 

Do any of you have photos or the exploded view of the 555.232 so I can see what parts are missing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, gkmaia said:

module 555.232

the problem will be usually tag modifies the components which is why the number after the decimal point isn't showing up on the typical lists. Like for instance at the website below has a whole bunch of 555's just don't have 232.

although second link has the parts list. So we really need is a 555 manual and the parts list you should bill of figure out what in the obtaining that that will be the challenge

conveniently it and not go spend a lot of times and 70 found you some links I'm not seeing any 555 manuals out there? But you can use a similar manual and figure out what parts you need is are all really basically the same can't quite remember but I think sometimes you can change the first number and it becomes a higher a lower grade movement so you may believe is a 255 manual for instance just to get an idea what the part numbering is and then look on the parts list.

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&ETA-ESA_555_111.

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=ETA_555.232

turns out cousins has a 555 something manual is a said you're not good I probably find the exact manual but he should bill still figured out from the parts list the manual etc.

but you're still stuck with the watch companies like to make subtle little changes because they can because they were buying the movement and I'm surprised we were not a parts list of be surprised if you get some of those parts but maybe you can

 

3259_ETA 555.115,125,415,425.pdf

Edited by JohnR725
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is a type of tool that may be suitable to remove the bezel - though note that I'm pretty sure the watch should be face down - not face up, as in some of the photos of these tools on amazon & ebay! If you try one one of those, put the movement screws back in first to avoid accidents. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Removal-Professional-Remover-Watchmaker-Diameter/dp/B09XCH4QVN?source=ps-sl-shoppingads-lpcontext&ref_=fplfs&smid=A296NCMMFVXSDN&th=1  
    • Hi, I’m constantly asking my wife to help me with removing the stem in order to complete casing. To expand, this is not a challenge for me when the setting lever is secured by a screw (older calibers). However when the setting lever is attached to a spring loaded setting lever axel, like on more modern calibers, I simply don’t see how to apply enough pressure on the button to get the stem out short of putting the movement face down with the dial and hands attached, which I’m loath to do in order to avoid damaging the dial/hands? what technique should I be using? thanks  
    • Many thanks for your advice (being borne in mind at present) & offer Dell. When I was given the clock the plastic anchor was loose on the arbour (it had split at the 'hole') &, after repairing this, I have been trying to determine whether the spindle (pin) should be perpendicular when the pallet is sitting on a flat surface; or whether, when installed, its L-R extremes (or alternatively its tick & tock points) should lie at equal angles from the vertical when moved with spring absent. I can get the clock to run but in every such configuration the top block has to be turned anti-clockwise (from above) by quite a bit in order to be 'in beat' & it always runs fast (despite the pendulum being set to as slow as possible). This makes me wonder if there is any particular feature of/fault in a torsion spring clock which determines which turn direction (if any) is necessary to get it 'in beat'; & whether there would be a different set of settings that would get it running nearer to time at somewhere around the mid timing/inertia position which would then allow tweaking of the fast/slow setting.
    • Now this has happened I bet China or India just to name two will start to produce none genuine parts.  I did. But idiot Boris Johnson failed miserably in his negotiations. The E U stitched up the UK like a kipper. Nigel Farage  offered his help but big head Boris declined. So this is why we are in this mess all because Johnson wasn't clever enough.  
    • Hands up all those who voted to leave the EU 😂, oopsie.  UK has just signed the Hague convention, next year that will provide cross border clout to British courts.
×
×
  • Create New...